The massacre of 26 tourists in Pahalgam, Kashmir, on April 22 this year—claimed by ‘The Resistance Front’ (TRF), a group affiliated with the Pakistani militant outfit Lashkar-e-Taiba—marks a disturbing shift in cross-border militant strategies. While earlier attacks primarily targeted military personnel and installations, often with civilian casualties as collateral damage, this attack deliberately targeted unarmed tourists, violating all humanitarian norms and principles of warfare. This heinous act, aimed at soft targets, is not only morally reprehensible but also a serious assault on India's sovereignty and territorial integrity. It may have been prevented with more precise and timely intelligence operations, robust surveillance systems, and diligent efforts to secure the border through fencing and monitoring.
Even as the success of 'Operation Sindoor' is celebrated, media discourse must focus on ways to further fortify the country's security and intelligence apparatus. Modern tools such as Artificial Intelligence, Facial Recognition Technology, satellite imaging, surveillance sensors, specialized mobile applications, and the strategic use of social media platforms must be integrated for real-time intelligence gathering and analysis.
Only after the massacre and subsequent counter-terrorist operations did India's surveillance and intelligence agencies begin cracking down on individuals suspected of sharing sensitive security information with Pakistani handlers. While the precision and impact of 'Operation Sindoor' may set a new standard in counterterrorism, it should not overshadow the long-term imperative of prevention. The core strategy must shift toward preempting such attacks through actionable intelligence. For example, timely and detailed intelligence about the planned attack could have significantly reduced or even averted the incident. Reports suggest that the tourists entered Baisaran without proper police permission and that only two or three security personnel, armed with AK-47s, were present in the area. Although Baisaran meadow is open to tourists throughout the year, security deployment usually begins only in June with the start of the Amarnath Yatra. The government’s narrative of normalcy in Kashmir to promote tourism should have been accompanied by enhanced security measures on the ground.
Further, reports indicate that the Pahalgam attackers infiltrated from Kishtwar in Jammu and reached Baisaran via Kokernag in South Kashmir, exposing glaring lapses in border surveillance and fencing.
Terrorism has been a persistent and evolving threat to India. On February 14, 2019, a suicide car bombing by a Jaish-e-Mohammad operative killed at least 40 CRPF personnel in Pulwama, Jammu and Kashmir. This became the deadliest attack on Indian security forces in the region and only the second suicide car bombing since May 2000. The attacker rammed a car loaded with over 350 kg of explosives into a convoy on the Srinagar-Jammu highway. The militants clearly had precise information about the convoy’s movement, exposing serious intelligence and security failures, including how the RDX was transported undetected.
The region’s terrain—marked by hilly, forested, and inaccessible areas—facilitates infiltration from across the border, but this also demands sharper, more cautious, and technologically advanced intelligence operations. Effective surveillance of militant communication, especially through social media and digital platforms, can yield vital preemptive intelligence.
India has witnessed numerous terrorist attacks over the past two decades: the 2001 Parliament attack, the 2008 Mumbai attacks, the Gurdaspur attack in 2015, the Pathankot airbase attack in 2016, and the Uri military camp attack the same year. These, along with many lesser-known incidents, reveal the persistent threats posed by non-state actors to India’s territorial integrity and security infrastructure. These attacks frequently target military bases, transportation hubs, and public spaces, highlighting vulnerabilities and generating public fear. They underscore the urgent need for bolstering intelligence and surveillance capabilities using the most advanced technologies available.
When even defence bases, military convoys, and legislative buildings—supposedly among the most secure locations—can be attacked, it points to alarming lapses in security architecture. India’s policymakers and strategic community must urgently prioritize strengthening internal intelligence frameworks rather than focusing solely on modernizing defence through the procurement of conventional weapon systems. While India’s defence budget now stands at a staggering $75 billion—13.45% of the total government expenditure—more of this spending must be directed toward intelligence gathering, surveillance technologies, and early-warning systems, rather than only advanced weaponry.
Rather than relying solely on offensive operations, India must emphasize denial of threats through credible intelligence and swift countermeasures. Plugging security gaps and enhancing defence preparedness would prove far more effective in curbing terrorism than reactive military strategies, which often fail or even backfire. India has also made smart diplomatic moves in countering Pakistan’s disinformation campaigns by sending multi-party delegations abroad to present facts. In the current information age, countering fake narratives must be seen as an essential component of national security and diplomatic strategy.
---
*Senior Lecturer in the Department of Political Science at SVM Autonomous College, Jagatsinghpur, Odisha
Comments