Skip to main content

Why are secularism and socialism in the Constitution's Preamble an eyesore to Hindu nationalists

By Ram Puniyani* 
The RSS General Secretary, Dattatray Hosabale, who holds the second position in the RSS leadership hierarchy, recently stated  that the words "Secularism" and "Socialism" were inserted into the Preamble of the Indian Constitution during the Emergency. He further claimed that these words were not present in the original Preamble drafted by Dr. Ambedkar and, therefore, should be removed.
This is not the first time such a demand has been raised from Hindutva quarters. When the BJP government came to power in 2014, in the following Republic Day of January 2015, the government issued an advertisement featuring a picture of the Preamble in which these words were missing, under the same pretext that they were not in the version released in November 1949. A significant debate ensued, and a case was filed in the courts demanding the deletion of these words from the present Constitution.
Multiple petitions were filed on the eve of the 75th anniversary of the Constitution on November 25, 2024. The Supreme Court rejected and dismissed all petitions challenging the inclusion of the words "socialist" and "secular" in the Preamble. The justices held that the addition of these terms could not be objected to solely on the ground that the original Preamble did not contain them at the time the Constitution was adopted.
It's not just these two values that Hindu nationalists are against; they oppose the Constitution as a whole. During Constituent Assembly debates, many leaders had expressed apprehension that secularism would be undermined and emphasized the need to guard against this to the utmost. As a representative example, Sardar Patel's statement needs to be recalled: "I made it clear that this Constitution of India, of free India, of a secular State will not hereafter be disfigured by any provision on a communal basis."
As per the Constitution, Hosabale’s argument is on weak ground, as the very provisions of the Constitution spell out these words. According to the fundamental rights enshrined in Article 25, which deals with the freedom of conscience and free profession, practice, and propagation of religion, the word "secular" is explicitly mentioned under clause (2)(a).
Due to electoral compulsions, the BJP speaks in many tongues. It began with "Gandhian Socialism," which was abandoned in 1985 in favor of the caste-hierarchy-based "integral humanism." In the BJP's Constitution of 2012, it stated its objective as aiming for a party that "...shall bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of India as by law established and to the principles of socialism, secularism and democracy and would uphold the sovereignty, unity and integrity of India."
The core agenda of RSS-BJP is to strive for a Hindu Nation where the Manu Smriti will be the guiding principle. Right after the Indian Constitution was implemented on January 26, 1950, the RSS mouthpiece, Organiser, published an editorial heavily criticizing the Constitution. It stated on November 30, 1949, "The worst [thing] about the new Constitution of Bharat is that there is nothing Bhartiya about it… [T]here is no trace of ancient Bhartiya constitutional laws, institutions, nomenclature and phraseology in it." This implies that the Manu Smriti had been ignored by the makers of the Indian Constitution.
At the same time, the ideologue of Hindu Nationalism, V.D. Savarkar, stated that "Manu Smriti is that scripture which is most worship-able after Vedas for our Hindu Nation and which from ancient times has become the basis of our culture-customs, thought and practice. This book for centuries has codified the spiritual and divine march of our nation. Even today the rules which are followed by crores of Hindus in their lives and practice are based on Manu Smriti. Today Manu Smriti is Hindu Law. That is fundamental."
[V.D. Savarkar, ‘Women in Manu Smriti’ in Savarkar Samgra (collection of Savarkar’s writings in Hindi), Prabhat, Delhi, vol. 4, p. 415.]
In the decade of the 1990s, three major statements and actions again demonstrated its deeper and real affinity and goal of a Hindu Nation. In 1993, Rajju Bhiayya, the then Sarsanghchalak of RSS, stated that "Official documents refer to the composite culture, but ours is certainly not a composite culture… this country has a unique cultural oneness. No country, if it has to survive, can have compartments. All this shows that changes are needed in the Constitution. A Constitution more suited to the ethos and genius of this country should be adopted in the future."
In 1998, the BJP came to power as part of the NDA. One of the major things it did was to appoint the Venkatachaliah Commission to review the Constitution, asserting that it had become old and needed revision. The Commission did submit its report, but there was huge opposition to it, and so the implementation of its recommendations was put on hold.
Undeterred by all this, in the year 2000, when K. Sudarshan became the Sarsanghchalak of RSS, he stated that the Indian Constitution is based on Western values and should be scrapped and replaced by one based on Hindu Holy books (i.e., Manu Smriti).
Many BJP leaders have kept echoing this line on and off. Anant Kumar Hegde of Karnataka explicitly stated that they are in power precisely for changing the Constitution. In the light of the "400 par" (beyond 400 parliament seats) slogan of the BJP, many of their leaders reiterated that they need these many seats so that they can achieve their goal of changing the Constitution.
The BJP's tactical flexibility was on display when Mr. Modi said that even if Babasaheb Ambedkar were to return, he could not change the Constitution. In the backdrop of the 2024 elections, Rahul Gandhi made a major issue around the Constitution by carrying a copy of it in his hand. There was no overt opposition from the RSS-BJP camp, and Modi even bowed to the copy of the Constitution.
The RSS-BJP strategy is multipronged: to try to tamper with the Constitution through various steps and, at the same time, to adopt policies that bypass the ethos of the Constitution when in power. That’s what we have been witnessing for the last decade or so. Hosabale’s statement is a calculated move to test the waters, to march further in their agenda of doing away with democratic, secular values and equality.
---
*Youtube Facebook Instagram Whatsapp
Twitter Pinterest My Website

Comments

Post a Comment

TRENDING

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

  By Rajiv Shah   This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.
1 comment
»

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan*  “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.
Post a Comment
»

Asbestos contamination in children’s products highlights global oversight gaps

By A Representative   A commentary published by the International Ban Asbestos Secretariat (IBAS) has drawn attention to the challenges governments face in responding effectively to global public-health risks. In an article written by Laurie Kazan-Allen and published on March 5, 2026, the author examines how the discovery of asbestos contamination in children’s play products has raised questions about regulatory oversight and international product safety. The article opens by reflecting on lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that governments in several countries were slow to respond to early warning signs of the crisis. Referring to the experience of the United Kingdom, the author writes that delays in implementing protective measures contributed to “232,112 recorded deaths and over a million people suffering from long Covid.” The commentary uses this example to illustrate what it describes as the dangers of underestimating emerging threats. Attention then turns...
Post a Comment
»

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.
59 comments
»

India’s green energy push faces talent crunch amidst record growth at 16% CAGR

By Jag Jivan*  A new study by a top consulting firm has found that India’s cleantech sector is entering a decisive growth phase, with strong policy backing, record capacity additions and surging investor interest, but facing mounting pressure on talent supply and rising compensation costs .
Post a Comment
»

The kitchen as prison: A feminist elegy for domestic slavery

By Garima Srivastava* Kumar Ambuj stands as one of the most incisive voices in contemporary Hindi poetry. His work, stripped of ornamentation, speaks directly to the lived realities of India’s marginalized—women, the rural poor, and those crushed under invisible forms of violence. His celebrated poem “Women Who Cook” (Khānā Banātī Striyāṃ) is not merely about food preparation; it is a searing indictment of patriarchal domestic structures that reduce women’s existence to endless, unpaid labour.
Post a Comment
»

Beyond sattvik: Purity, caste and the politics of the Indian kitchen

By Rajiv Shah   A few week ago, I was forwarded an article that appeared in the British weekly The Economist . Titled “Caste and cuisine: From honeycomb curry to blood fry: India’s ‘untouchable’ cooking”, it took me back to what I had blogged about what was called a “ sattvik food festival”, an annual event organised by former Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad professor Anil Gupta.
2 comments
»

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".
51 comments
»

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey*  ​In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.
Post a Comment
»