Skip to main content

When the Chief Minister scales a fence: What remains of democracy in Kashmir?

By Sandeep Pandey* 
In Lucknow, we saw Akhilesh Yadav scaling the fence of the Jayaprakash Narayan International Centre—ironically built by his own government—to pay respect to the iconic Socialist leader on his birthday in 2023. The Yogi Adityanath government had denied him permission, citing security concerns. What could be the security concern in visiting a memorial is inexplicable.
What is understandable, however, is that Akhilesh Yadav is an opposition leader. But Omar Abdullah is the Chief Minister of Jammu and Kashmir. He was denied permission by Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha on 13 July to visit the graveyard of 22 Kashmiris who died on this day in 1931 in police firing ordered by the Dogra ruler Hari Singh.
These people were part of a large crowd that had gathered outside the Central Jail in Srinagar for the court hearing of Abdul Qadeer, who had called for a revolt against the king’s tyrannical rule. For the people of J&K, this incident has been part of their freedom struggle.
That struggle culminated when the ruler fled the kingdom along with his Prime Minister in the face of an attack by Pakistan-sponsored irregulars, and Sheikh Abdullah took over the leadership of the state to fight alongside the Indian Army to save Kashmir.
13 July is observed every year as Martyr’s Day in J&K. However, since 2019, when Article 370 was diluted and Article 35A was abrogated, the practice of observing a holiday on 13 July was discontinued by the administration. This move has clearly not gone down well with the people.
13 July 2025 will go down as a dark day in Indian democracy. Both the National Conference and the People’s Democratic Party, the two major political parties in J&K, had requested permission from the Lieutenant Governor to observe Martyr’s Day.
The graveyard where the 22 martyrs are buried, Mazar-e-Shuhada, was kept out of bounds for the public. Once again, the LG office cited the same implausible reason: a security concern.
What was even more shameful was that CM Omar Abdullah, opposition leader Mehbooba Mufti, and other ministers and leaders were placed under house arrest. This reminded people of the draconian clampdown in 2019 when J&K’s special status was revoked.
Then, in an act of defiance, Omar Abdullah scaled the fence of Mazar-e-Shuhada the next day, 14 July, along with other ministers of his government. But not before being manhandled by his own police, who were trying to prevent him from reaching the graveyard.
It almost appears as if Omar Abdullah is fighting another freedom struggle—this time for the autonomy of his elected government, which remains under siege by the Union government-imposed administration in J&K. He has expressed his anguish, stating he has suffered silently for the past eight months.
Can we imagine, in any other Indian state, the Governor or LG placing the Chief Minister and elected Assembly members under house arrest? Or the police manhandling their own CM?
This is enough to show that the Union Government has different standards for dealing with J&K. It only held Assembly elections because of a Supreme Court order. Yet, the elected government remains subservient to the LG. There isn’t even the pretense of democracy in J&K.
It is outright rule by the Union government, with scant regard for the people’s mandate. How do we expect the people of J&K to have any faith in the Indian state?
If India wants J&K to be truly integrated, it must ensure that the people of the state enjoy the same rights as citizens in other parts of the country. Merely diluting Article 370 and revoking Article 35A has not achieved that.
The Army rule must be withdrawn, and power restored to the elected government. The first step toward this is the restoration of full statehood. What’s needed is sensitivity, but the Union government continues to rely on its usual high-handed tactics.
The key question remains: how do we end the alienation of the people of J&K—aptly described by Omar Abdullah?
Mehbooba Mufti has very poignantly asked: if Kashmiris have embraced Indian freedom fighters like Mahatma Gandhi and Bhagat Singh, why can’t the Government of India acknowledge Kashmiri freedom fighters in return?
This would honour the sentiments of the people—especially if the goal is to end the dil ki doori (distance of hearts), as Prime Minister Narendra Modi has put it.
The government’s approach is insensitive. Labeling the people Kashmiris hold in reverence as rioters only deepens mistrust. If the Union government sides with the Dogra ruler, it disrespects not only the people of J&K but also all those in princely states who fought their own rulers as part of India’s broader freedom struggle.
Mahatma Gandhi’s words are worth recalling: “The real sovereign of the state are the people. The ruler is a servant of the people. If he is not so, then he is not the ruler... In Kashmir too, the power belongs to the public.”
Is there any doubt who Gandhi would have supported between the Dogra ruler and the people his police fired upon?
It is important to note that Gandhi applied the same yardstick to Kashmiris as he did to the rest of India—something that successive Indian governments have failed to do since J&K’s accession.
The discriminatory treatment of the people of J&K—especially its elected government—by the Union government is unacceptable. J&K should be governed by the people’s mandate, not the Union’s dictates.
True democracy needs to be restored in J&K. It has been systematically undermined by successive Indian governments. Omar Abdullah’s act of defiance shows that the people of J&K remain committed to their democratic rights and will continue to fight until they are restored.
---
*General Secretary of Socialist Party (India).

Comments

Post a Comment

TRENDING

Academics urge Azim Premji University to drop FIR against Student Reading Circle

  By A Representative   A group of academics and civil society members has issued an open letter to the leadership of Azim Premji University expressing concern over the filing of a police complaint that led to an FIR against a student-run reading circle following a recent incident of violence on campus. The signatories state that they hold the university in high regard for its commitment to constitutional values, critical inquiry and ethical public engagement, and argue that it is precisely because of this reputation that the present development is troubling.
Post a Comment
»

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

  By Rajiv Shah   This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.
1 comment
»

UAPA action against Telangana activist: Criminalising legitimate democratic activity?

By A Representative   The National Investigation Agency's Hyderabad branch has issued notices to more than ten individuals in Telangana in connection with FIR No. RC-04/2025. Those served include activists, former student leaders, civil rights advocates, poets, writers, retired schoolteachers, and local leaders associated with the Communist Party of India (CPI) and the Indian National Congress. 
Post a Comment
»

The ultimate all-time ODI XI: A personal selection of icons across eras

By Harsh Thakor* This is my all-time best XI chosen for ODI (One Day International) cricket:  1. Adam Gilchrist (W) – The absolute master blaster who could create the impact of exploding gunpowder with his electrifying strokeplay. No batsman was more intimidating in his era. Often his knocks decided the fate of games as though the result were premeditated. He escalated batting strike rates to surreal realms.
Post a Comment
»

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.
59 comments
»

Aligning too closely with U.S., allies, India’s silence on IRIS Dena raises troubling questions

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The reported sinking of the Iranian ship IRIS Dena in the Indian Ocean near Sri Lanka raises troubling questions about international norms and the credibility of the so-called rule-based order. If indeed the vessel was attacked by the American Navy while returning from a joint exercise in Visakhapatnam, it would represent a serious breach of trust and a violation of the principles that govern such cooperative engagements. Warships participating in these exercises are generally not armed for combat; they are meant to symbolize solidarity and friendship. The incident, therefore, is not only shocking but also deeply ironic.
Post a Comment
»

Asbestos contamination in children’s products highlights global oversight gaps

By A Representative   A commentary published by the International Ban Asbestos Secretariat (IBAS) has drawn attention to the challenges governments face in responding effectively to global public-health risks. In an article written by Laurie Kazan-Allen and published on March 5, 2026, the author examines how the discovery of asbestos contamination in children’s play products has raised questions about regulatory oversight and international product safety. The article opens by reflecting on lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that governments in several countries were slow to respond to early warning signs of the crisis. Referring to the experience of the United Kingdom, the author writes that delays in implementing protective measures contributed to “232,112 recorded deaths and over a million people suffering from long Covid.” The commentary uses this example to illustrate what it describes as the dangers of underestimating emerging threats. Attention then turns...
Post a Comment
»

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".
51 comments
»

The kitchen as prison: A feminist elegy for domestic slavery

By Garima Srivastava* Kumar Ambuj stands as one of the most incisive voices in contemporary Hindi poetry. His work, stripped of ornamentation, speaks directly to the lived realities of India’s marginalized—women, the rural poor, and those crushed under invisible forms of violence. His celebrated poem “Women Who Cook” (Khānā Banātī Striyāṃ) is not merely about food preparation; it is a searing indictment of patriarchal domestic structures that reduce women’s existence to endless, unpaid labour.
Post a Comment
»