When the Chief Minister scales a fence: What remains of democracy in Kashmir?

By Sandeep Pandey*

In Lucknow, we saw Akhilesh Yadav scaling the fence of the Jayaprakash Narayan International Centre—ironically built by his own government—to pay respect to the iconic Socialist leader on his birthday in 2023. The Yogi Adityanath government had denied him permission, citing security concerns. What could be the security concern in visiting a memorial is inexplicable.

What is understandable, however, is that Akhilesh Yadav is an opposition leader. But Omar Abdullah is the Chief Minister of Jammu and Kashmir. He was denied permission by Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha on 13 July to visit the graveyard of 22 Kashmiris who died on this day in 1931 in police firing ordered by the Dogra ruler Hari Singh.

These people were part of a large crowd that had gathered outside the Central Jail in Srinagar for the court hearing of Abdul Qadeer, who had called for a revolt against the king’s tyrannical rule. For the people of J&K, this incident has been part of their freedom struggle.

That struggle culminated when the ruler fled the kingdom along with his Prime Minister in the face of an attack by Pakistan-sponsored irregulars, and Sheikh Abdullah took over the leadership of the state to fight alongside the Indian Army to save Kashmir.

13 July is observed every year as Martyr’s Day in J&K. However, since 2019, when Article 370 was diluted and Article 35A was abrogated, the practice of observing a holiday on 13 July was discontinued by the administration. This move has clearly not gone down well with the people.

13 July 2025 will go down as a dark day in Indian democracy. Both the National Conference and the People’s Democratic Party, the two major political parties in J&K, had requested permission from the Lieutenant Governor to observe Martyr’s Day.

The graveyard where the 22 martyrs are buried, Mazar-e-Shuhada, was kept out of bounds for the public. Once again, the LG office cited the same implausible reason: a security concern.

What was even more shameful was that CM Omar Abdullah, opposition leader Mehbooba Mufti, and other ministers and leaders were placed under house arrest. This reminded people of the draconian clampdown in 2019 when J&K’s special status was revoked.

Then, in an act of defiance, Omar Abdullah scaled the fence of Mazar-e-Shuhada the next day, 14 July, along with other ministers of his government. But not before being manhandled by his own police, who were trying to prevent him from reaching the graveyard.

It almost appears as if Omar Abdullah is fighting another freedom struggle—this time for the autonomy of his elected government, which remains under siege by the Union government-imposed administration in J&K. He has expressed his anguish, stating he has suffered silently for the past eight months.

Can we imagine, in any other Indian state, the Governor or LG placing the Chief Minister and elected Assembly members under house arrest? Or the police manhandling their own CM?

This is enough to show that the Union Government has different standards for dealing with J&K. It only held Assembly elections because of a Supreme Court order. Yet, the elected government remains subservient to the LG. There isn’t even the pretense of democracy in J&K.

It is outright rule by the Union government, with scant regard for the people’s mandate. How do we expect the people of J&K to have any faith in the Indian state?

If India wants J&K to be truly integrated, it must ensure that the people of the state enjoy the same rights as citizens in other parts of the country. Merely diluting Article 370 and revoking Article 35A has not achieved that.

The Army rule must be withdrawn, and power restored to the elected government. The first step toward this is the restoration of full statehood. What’s needed is sensitivity, but the Union government continues to rely on its usual high-handed tactics.

The key question remains: how do we end the alienation of the people of J&K—aptly described by Omar Abdullah?

Mehbooba Mufti has very poignantly asked: if Kashmiris have embraced Indian freedom fighters like Mahatma Gandhi and Bhagat Singh, why can’t the Government of India acknowledge Kashmiri freedom fighters in return?

This would honour the sentiments of the people—especially if the goal is to end the dil ki doori (distance of hearts), as Prime Minister Narendra Modi has put it.

The government’s approach is insensitive. Labeling the people Kashmiris hold in reverence as rioters only deepens mistrust. If the Union government sides with the Dogra ruler, it disrespects not only the people of J&K but also all those in princely states who fought their own rulers as part of India’s broader freedom struggle.

Mahatma Gandhi’s words are worth recalling: “The real sovereign of the state are the people. The ruler is a servant of the people. If he is not so, then he is not the ruler... In Kashmir too, the power belongs to the public.”

Is there any doubt who Gandhi would have supported between the Dogra ruler and the people his police fired upon?

It is important to note that Gandhi applied the same yardstick to Kashmiris as he did to the rest of India—something that successive Indian governments have failed to do since J&K’s accession.

The discriminatory treatment of the people of J&K—especially its elected government—by the Union government is unacceptable. J&K should be governed by the people’s mandate, not the Union’s dictates.

True democracy needs to be restored in J&K. It has been systematically undermined by successive Indian governments. Omar Abdullah’s act of defiance shows that the people of J&K remain committed to their democratic rights and will continue to fight until they are restored.

---

*General Secretary of Socialist Party (India).

Comments

The curious case of multiple entries of a female voter of Maharashtra: What ECI's online voter records reveal

By Venkatesh Nayak* Cyberspace is agog with data, names and documents which question the reliability of the electoral rolls prepared by the electoral bureaucracy in Maharashtra prior to the General Elections conducted in 2024. One such example of deep dive probing has brought to the surface, the name of one female voter in the 132-Nalasopara (Gen) Vidhan Sabha Constituency in Maharashtra. Nalasopara is part of the Palghar (ST) Lok Sabha constituency. This media report claims that this individual's name figures multiple times in the voter list of the same constituency.

N-power plant at Mithi Virdi: CRZ nod is arbitrary, without jurisdiction

By Krishnakant* A case-appeal has been filed against the order of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) and others granting CRZ clearance for establishment of intake and outfall facility for proposed 6000 MWe Nuclear Power Plant at Mithi Virdi, District Bhavnagar, Gujarat by Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) vide order in F 11-23 /2014-IA- III dated March 3, 2015. The case-appeal in the National Green Tribunal at Western Bench at Pune is filed by Shaktisinh Gohil, Sarpanch of Jasapara; Hajabhai Dihora of Mithi Virdi; Jagrutiben Gohil of Jasapara; Krishnakant and Rohit Prajapati activist of the Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti. The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has issued a notice to the MoEF&CC, Gujarat Pollution Control Board, Gujarat Coastal Zone Management Authority, Atomic Energy Regulatory Board and Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) and case is kept for hearing on August 20, 2015. Appeal No. 23 of 2015 (WZ) is filed, a...

1857 War of Independence... when Hindu-Muslim separatism, hatred wasn't an issue

"The Sepoy Revolt at Meerut", Illustrated London News, 1857 By Shamsul Islam* Large sections of Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs unitedly challenged the greatest imperialist power, Britain, during India’s First War of Independence which began on May 10, 1857; the day being Sunday. This extraordinary unity, naturally, unnerved the firangees and made them realize that if their rule was to continue in India, it could happen only when Hindus and Muslims, the largest two religious communities were divided on communal lines.

Spirit of leadership vs bondage: Of empowered chairman of 100-acre social forestry coop

By Gagan Sethi* This is about Khoda Sava, a young Dalit belonging to the Vankar sub-caste, who worked as a bonded labourer in a village near Vadgam in Banskantha district of North Gujarat. The year was 1982. Khoda had taken a loan of Rs 7,000 from the village sarpanch, a powerful landlord doing money-lending as his side business. Khoda, who had taken the loan for marriage, was landless. Normally, villagers would mortgage their land if they took loan from the sarpanch. But Khoda had no land. He had no option but to enter into a bondage agreement with the sarpanch in order to repay the loan. Working in bondage on the sarpanch’s field meant that he would be paid Rs 1,200 per annum, from which his loan amount with interest would be deducted. He was also obliged not to leave the sarpanch’s field and work as daily wager somewhere else. At the same time, Khoda was offered meal once a day, and his wife job as agricultural worker on a “priority basis”. That year, I was working as secretary...

Ground reality: Israel would a remain Jewish state, attempt to overthrow it will be futile

By NS Venkataraman* Now that truce has been arrived at between Israel and Hamas for a period of four days and with release of a few hostages from both sides, there is hope that truce would be further extended and the intensity of war would become significantly less. This likely “truce period” gives an opportunity for the sworn supporters and bitter opponents of Hamas as well as Israel and the observers around the world to introspect on the happenings and whether this war could have been avoided. There is prolonged debate for the last several decades as to whom the present region that has been provided to Jews after the World War II belong. View of some people is that Jews have been occupants earlier and therefore, the region should belong to Jews only. However, Christians and those belonging to Islam have also lived in this regions for long period. While Christians make no claim, the dispute is between Jews and those who claim themselves to be Palestinians. In any case...

Bangladesh alternative more vital for NE India than Kaladan project in Myanmar

By Mehjabin Bhanu* There has been a recent surge in the number of Chin refugees entering Mizoram from the adjacent nation as a result of airstrikes by the Myanmar Army on ethnic insurgents and intense fighting along the border between India and Myanmar. Uncertainty has surrounded India's Kaladan Multimodal Transit Transport project, which uses Sittwe port in Myanmar, due to the recent outbreak of hostilities along the Mizoram-Myanmar border. Construction on the road portion of the Kaladan project, which runs from Paletwa in Myanmar to Zorinpui in Mizoram, was resumed thanks to the time of relative calm during the intermittent period. However, recent unrest has increased concerns about missing the revised commissioning goal dates. The project's goal is to link northeastern states with the rest of India via an alternate route, using the Sittwe port in Myanmar. In addition to this route, India can also connect the region with the rest of India through Assam by using the Chittagon...

How AMU student politics prioritises Islamist ideologies rather than addressing campus-specific concerns

By Yanis Iqbal* In his recent piece titled "Unmasking the Power Struggles of Soqme Teachers Behind the AMU Students’ Agitation," Mohammad Sajjad, professor of modern and contemporary Indian history at the Aligarh Muslim University (AMU), has has approached the recent protests against fee increases at AMU with a skeptical eye. He portrays them not as a pure, student-led reaction to financial burdens, but as possibly intertwined with deeper institutional rivalries. While recognizing that the university administration faces ongoing demands from the government and the University Grants Commission (UGC) to boost self-generated revenue via fee adjustments, he highlights a key shortfall: neither the administration nor the protesters have shared clear, comparative data on fee structures or their rationale.

A wake-up call for Uttarakhand: The human cost of unchecked development, environmental destruction

By Dr. Gurinder Kaur* On August 5, 2025, a cloudburst in Uttarakhand’s Uttarkashi district caused significant destruction. A sudden surge in the Kheer Ganga river's flow triggered a flash flood that hit the town of Dharali, completely destroying 40–50 buildings and houses and claiming five lives. More than 100 people are still missing, including nine army personnel. Due to heavy rainfall and landslides, traffic has come to a complete halt on 163 roads and five national highways in the state. Rescue teams are continuously assisting people in the affected areas. A large number of pilgrims heading to Gangotri usually stay in Dharali, which is why there are many hotels, restaurants, and homestays in the town.

NREGA Sangharsh Morcha demands rollback of NMMS App, restoration of workers’ rights

By A Representative The NREGA Sangharsh Morcha (NSM) has strongly demanded the immediate revocation of the National Mobile Monitoring System (NMMS) App used for recording workers’ attendance under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA). Citing the Union Ministry of Rural Development’s (MoRD) July 8, 2025 directive acknowledging widespread misuse and discrepancies in the NMMS App, NSM accused the government of admitting to deep-rooted corruption while continuing to impose a failed digital system.

Search This Blog