Remembering Sumit: A gentle, radical journalist, who tried to continue his father's legacy

By Rajiv Shah

This is about Sumit Chakravartty, who passed away in Kolkata last Saturday. One of the most unassuming colleagues during my Patriot-Link days in Delhi, which lasted from 1979 to 1993, Sumit, as we would address him, was perhaps the most polite and soft-spoken among all others.

Upon his return from Moscow, where he served as Patriot-Link's foreign correspondent around the time I joined Link as a sub-editor on January 1, 1979—my first day as a journalist—Sumit took on the role of special correspondent, covering foreign affairs and the Left parties.

I remember Sumit as a deeply ideologically driven person, emotionally discussing workers' struggles on one hand and condemning "American imperialism" on the other, while unwaveringly defending the Soviet Union. So emotionally charged was he that, I recall, during a protest by Patriot-Link workers against the paper's transition to computers in the early 1980s—perhaps the first to do it in Delhi—Sumit was one of the few journalists who joined workers in shouting slogans against management. It's worth noting that a compromise was eventually reached, allowing linotype workers to be retrained for computers and move to a spacious, air-conditioned room.

After Sumit returned from Moscow, Vinod Taksal took his place, and after Vinod’s tenure ended, I was sent to Moscow. Before my departure in early 1986, Sumit (if I remember correctly, he had already left Patriot-Link to join The Daily by then) gave me valuable advice about Moscow. He invited me to his home and, as I was about to leave, handed me a sky-blue windcheater, saying it would be useful for the mild Moscow winter. "I don't have any use for it," he said, wishing me the best of luck with my new assignment.

A die-hard pro-Soviet and often quite vocal in criticizing the Left, too, Sumit knew most Communist leaders personally. Strongly critical of the BJP, his political reports were filled with emotionally charged terms like "imperialism," "fascism," "Left adventurism," and so on. However, in personal conversations, he was extremely polite and unusually eager to befriend everyone he met.

I had no interaction with him between 1986 and 1993, while I was working as a foreign correspondent in Moscow. On my return to India in April 1993, I was looking for opportunities, as Patriot-Link was financially struggling after veteran freedom fighter Aruna Asaf Ali, who controlled the papers, turned down an offer from the Ambanis to take over. As part of my search, I met Sumit.

By then, Sumit seemed to have taken over Mainstream weekly, a Left-of-center periodical that had been running for decades under the leadership of his father, Nikhil Chakravartty (1913–1998). After Nikhil's passing, the responsibility of running the weekly appeared to fall on Sumit.

In 1993, I met Sumit at the Mainstream office in Gole Market, Delhi. I asked if he could connect me with someone in Delhi’s media who could offer me a reasonable opportunity. He politely replied, "Sure! They need someone who understands foreign affairs, which you do, given your Moscow experience. I'll get back to you..."

Soon after, I met Dilip Padgaonkar, the editor-in-chief of The Times of India. Dilip had approached me in Moscow, but since I was already working full-time with Patriot-Link and the Times wanted a stringer, nothing worked out. "If not Moscow, why not Ahmedabad?" he asked me, and I agreed. I then moved to Ahmedabad, and, to my regret, I never reached out to Sumit again.

Searching for information about Sumit online was difficult. I found only two media obituaries—one by veteran journalist Anand Sahay in The Wire and another by VK Cherian in a Facebook post. Anand’s obituary offers a personal, impressionistic account of Sumit, while Cherian’s suggests that Sumit’s professional career was overshadowed by his father.

To quote Cherian, Sumit took over Mainstream after his father’s death in 1998 and transitioned it into a digital journal "as old funders, mostly his father's friends, dried up." Cherian went on to explain that under Nikhil’s leadership, Mainstream had been like the Seminar magazine of Romesh Thapar—intellectual, cerebral, and in-depth. Nikhil was a person who "used to have breakfast" with Indira Gandhi and PV Narasimha Rao when they were Prime Ministers.

Cherian also mentioned that Nikhil had close ties with the Soviet establishment and was instrumental in sending CPI leaders on a submarine to meet Stalin in the 1950s. Sumit, too, had witnessed that secret entry as a boy. Cherian noted that while Nikhil had no shortage of funding, Sumit had the significant burden of maintaining his father’s legacy and securing funding, which is why the weekly transitioned to a digital edition.

Sumit’s mother, Renu Chakravartty (1917–1994), was also a prominent figure in the Left movement. A women’s leader and a member of Parliament from the Communist Party of India in the 1950s and 1960s, she played a crucial role in the movement.

So who will edit Mainstream now? It was a one-person army under Sumit. I don't know about the future of a journal originally founded by Nikhil Chakravartty, a doyen of Indian journalism. I tried searching the site to find out if a detailed obituary of Sumit exists on it, but to no avail.

Comments

Academics urge Azim Premji University to drop FIR against Student Reading Circle

By A Representative A group of academics and civil society members has issued an open letter to the leadership of Azim Premji University expressing concern over the filing of a police complaint that led to an FIR against a student-run reading circle following a recent incident of violence on campus. The signatories state that they hold the university in high regard for its commitment to constitutional values, critical inquiry and ethical public engagement, and argue that it is precisely because of this reputation that the present development is troubling.

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

By Rajiv Shah This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

UAPA action against Telangana activist: Criminalising legitimate democratic activity?

By A Representative The National Investigation Agency's Hyderabad branch has issued notices to more than ten individuals in Telangana in connection with FIR No. RC-04/2025. Those served include activists, former student leaders, civil rights advocates, poets, writers, retired schoolteachers, and local leaders associated with the Communist Party of India (CPI) and the Indian National Congress.

The ultimate all-time ODI XI: A personal selection of icons across eras

By Harsh Thakor* This is my all-time best XI chosen for ODI (One Day International) cricket: 1. Adam Gilchrist (W) – The absolute master blaster who could create the impact of exploding gunpowder with his electrifying strokeplay. No batsman was more intimidating in his era. Often his knocks decided the fate of games as though the result were premeditated. He escalated batting strike rates to surreal realms.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Aligning too closely with U.S., allies, India’s silence on IRIS Dena raises troubling questions

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* The reported sinking of the Iranian ship IRIS Dena in the Indian Ocean near Sri Lanka raises troubling questions about international norms and the credibility of the so-called rule-based order. If indeed the vessel was attacked by the American Navy while returning from a joint exercise in Visakhapatnam, it would represent a serious breach of trust and a violation of the principles that govern such cooperative engagements. Warships participating in these exercises are generally not armed for combat; they are meant to symbolize solidarity and friendship. The incident, therefore, is not only shocking but also deeply ironic.

Asbestos contamination in children’s products highlights global oversight gaps

By A Representative A commentary published by the International Ban Asbestos Secretariat (IBAS) has drawn attention to the challenges governments face in responding effectively to global public-health risks. In an article written by Laurie Kazan-Allen and published on March 5, 2026, the author examines how the discovery of asbestos contamination in children’s play products has raised questions about regulatory oversight and international product safety. The article opens by reflecting on lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that governments in several countries were slow to respond to early warning signs of the crisis. Referring to the experience of the United Kingdom, the author writes that delays in implementing protective measures contributed to “232,112 recorded deaths and over a million people suffering from long Covid.” The commentary uses this example to illustrate what it describes as the dangers of underestimating emerging threats. Attention then turns...

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

The kitchen as prison: A feminist elegy for domestic slavery

By Garima Srivastava* Kumar Ambuj stands as one of the most incisive voices in contemporary Hindi poetry. His work, stripped of ornamentation, speaks directly to the lived realities of India’s marginalized—women, the rural poor, and those crushed under invisible forms of violence. His celebrated poem “Women Who Cook” (Khānā Banātī Striyāṃ) is not merely about food preparation; it is a searing indictment of patriarchal domestic structures that reduce women’s existence to endless, unpaid labour.

Search This Blog