Skip to main content

Protest in Delhi demands rollback of gene-edited rice and wildlife compensation law

By A Representative
 
Farmers’ organizations from across India have staged a demonstration at Jantar Mantar, demanding the immediate withdrawal of recently announced gene-edited rice varieties and the enactment of a national law to compensate people and crops affected by wildlife. The protest, organized by a coalition of farmers, tribal leaders, organic agriculture groups, and fisherfolk, sought to highlight what they called the Union Government’s disregard for ecological and social consequences in its agricultural policies.
Participants strongly opposed the central government’s approval of two gene-edited rice varieties—DRR Dhan 100 (Kamala) and Pusa DST Rice-1—arguing that these were approved without the environmental and safety assessments required under the Environment Protection Act. They emphasized that India has over 6,000 traditional rice varieties that are more resilient to drought and climate change and are compatible with biodiversity and organic farming. Protesters accused the government of bypassing proper testing procedures by labeling the varieties as “gene-edited” rather than genetically modified, which they warned could jeopardize the food security of 140 crore people.
The second key demand centered around the toll of wildlife attacks on rural communities. Between 2019 and 2023, 2,853 people reportedly died due to such incidents, with crop losses exceeding ₹10,000 crore annually. Protesters highlighted that victims—including small farmers, tribal populations, plantation workers, and fisherfolk—often receive no compensation, and those who survive attacks sometimes spend years incapacitated. They called for a national compensation law under Article 300 of the Constitution to address inconsistencies in state-level procedures and to treat the losses caused by wildlife—considered government property under Section 39 of the Wildlife Protection Act—as the government’s responsibility.
The demonstration was led by Advocate Eesan Murugasamy of the Tamil Nadu Farmers Protection Association and saw participation from several regional leaders including Kerala Farmers Association President P.T. John, BKU National Coordinator Yudhvir Singh, and representatives from farmers’ associations in Karnataka, Odisha, and Tamil Nadu. Activists also submitted petitions to the concerned central departments, urging prompt action on their demands.
The protest followed a related session held earlier at the Constitution Club of India, where many of the same participants voiced their concerns about the impact of the government’s agricultural and wildlife policies.

Comments

TRENDING

Manufacturing, services: India's low-skill, middle-skill labour remains underemployed

By Francis Kuriakose* The Indian economy was in a state of deceleration well before Covid-19 made its impact in early 2020. This can be inferred from the declining trends of four important macroeconomic variables that indicate the health of the economy in the last quarter of 2019.

The soundtrack of resistance: How 'Sada Sada Ya Nabi' is fueling the Iran war

​ By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  ​The Persian track “ Sada Sada Ya Nabi ye ” by Hossein Sotoodeh has taken the world by storm. This viral media has cut across linguistic barriers to achieve cult status, reaching over 10 million views. The electrifying music and passionate rendition by the Iranian singer have resonated across the globe, particularly as the high-intensity military conflict involving Iran entered its second month in March 2026.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”