Skip to main content

Ramakrishna Paramhansa's inclusive vision has been overshadowed by sectarianism

By Harasankar Adhikari 
Ramakrishna Paramhansa, the 19th-century mystic of Bengal, remains one of the most remarkable spiritual figures of India—not only for his profound devotion and teachings but for the depth and breadth of his human friendships. He forged emotional and spiritual bonds that transcended caste, class, gender, education, and religious dogma. His life was a living message of unity, compassion, and inclusivity—qualities painfully absent in today’s fragmented society.
Despite being an unlettered temple priest from humble origins, Ramakrishna drew into his circle thinkers, scholars, elites, and reformers of all stripes. One of the most well-known friendships was with Keshab Chandra Sen, a Western-educated, affluent leader of the Brahmo Samaj. The bond between a God-intoxicated temple priest and a rational, modernist reformer was not only unique—it was transformative. Keshab, who initially emphasized a formless God, came to deeply revere the Kali-worshipping mystic. This convergence of ideologies—the formless and the form—signaled a profound spiritual synthesis, which Keshab helped bring to national and international attention.
Ramakrishna’s philosophy went beyond mere tolerance; he believed in the divinity of every path and every person. In the epics, Rama stood for truth and Krishna for dharma through action. But Ramakrishna, in the age of colonial crisis and social upheaval, embodied the inclusive spirit of spiritual unity—truth, love, equity, and non-violence—all distilled in a life of simple devotion. His famous proclamation, "Joto mot toto poth" (“As many faiths, so many paths”), was not just a slogan—it was a lived reality.
Far from being confined to rituals and philosophy, his teachings embraced the social dimensions of life. He broke caste norms to revere Dhani Karamani, a poor woman who fed him as a child, calling her his bhiksha maa. He dined with the so-called ‘untouchable’ Rasik and respected prostitutes, seeing in one of them the divine form of Anandamayi Maa. Through these acts, he rejected the deeply entrenched caste system and elevated the dignity of women and the marginalized. For Ramakrishna, divinity was not confined to temples—it was found in the service of humanity.
In his devotion to Mother Kali, Ramakrishna redefined the role and reverence of women. He didn’t merely worship the goddess in an image; he honored womanhood itself as a living embodiment of Shakti—power, dignity, and spiritual strength. In a society often dismissive of women, he proclaimed them to be sacred, divine, and central to social progress. He revered his wife, Sarada Devi, as the Holy Mother—not as an appendage to his spirituality but as its equal and partner.
Today, as religious bigotry, casteism, and misogyny surge in the garb of politics and piety, Ramakrishna’s example is more relevant than ever—and more neglected. The current atmosphere of religious polarization, identity politics, and power struggles makes his universalism seem distant, almost utopian. But that is not an excuse to forget his teachings; rather, it is a clarion call to return to them.
Ramakrishna was not just a spiritual guide. He was a friend—of the elite and the ordinary, the pure and the fallen, the known and the forgotten. In his selfless love, non-judgmental acceptance, and deep respect for all, he embodied the soul of India.
It is deeply unfortunate that in today’s political climate, his inclusive vision has been overshadowed by sectarianism. Religion has been weaponized for power, rather than practiced for peace. The soul of Ramakrishna’s teachings has been lost in the noise of modern-day rhetoric.
The time has come to reawaken his spirit—not merely in temples and ashrams, but in our public life, politics, and personal conduct. Only then can we claim to be true followers of a man who saw God in all and loved all as God.

Comments

TRENDING

Sardar made up his mind on Pakistan in Dec 1946 "before" Mountbatten's Partition Plan

By Hari Desai* One has to be extra cautious while dealing with the history of towering personalities of the Indian freedom struggle, especially that of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel (October 31, 1875 - December 15, 1950). Present-day politicians prefer to "pronounce” on his life and quote him according to their convenience like a blind person describing an elephant.

Insider plot to kill Deendayal Upadhyay? What RSS pracharak Balraj Madhok said

By Shamsul Islam*  Balraj Madhok's died on May 2, 2016 ending an era of old guards of Hindutva politics. A senior RSS pracharak till his death was paid handsome tributes by the RSS leaders including PM Modi, himself a senior pracharak, for being a "stalwart leader of Jan Sangh. Balraj Madhok ji's ideological commitment was strong and clarity of thought immense. He was selflessly devoted to the nation and society. I had the good fortune of interacting with Balraj Madhok ji on many occasions". The RSS also issued a formal condolence message signed by the Supremo Mohan Bhagwat on behalf of all swayamsevaks, referring to his contribution of commitment to nation and society. He was a leading RSS pracharak on whom his organization relied for initiating prominent Hindutva projects. But today nobody in the RSS-BJP top hierarchy remembers/talks about Madhok as he was an insider chronicler of the immense degeneration which was spreading as an epidemic in the high echelons of th...

If Maoist violence is illegitimate, how is Hindutva, state violence justified? Can right-wing wash off its sins?

By Swami Agnivesh* and Sandeep Pandey** There was major police action against Sudha Bhardwaj, Gautam Navlakha, Varvara Rao, Vernon Gonsalves and Arun Ferreira on 28 August, 2018. Before this police arrested Professor Shoma Sen, Adocate Sudhir Gadling, Sudhir Dhawle, Mahesh Raut and Rona Wilson on 6 June. Even before this Dr. Binayak Sen, Soni Sori, Ajay TG, Professor GN Saibaba and Prashant Rahi have been arrested and all these activists have been accused of having links with Maoists.