Skip to main content

PM's April 2025 foreign visits cost Rs 10 crore; Embassy in Thailand withholds details under RTI

By Rosamma Thomas* 
Transparency activist Commodore Lokesh Batra wrote to Indian embassies in Saudi Arabia, Thailand, and Sri Lanka in June this year, seeking details of expenses incurred by Indian missions abroad during Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visits to these countries in April 2025. Modi visited Thailand on April 3 and 4, on the invitation of the Prime Minister of Thailand. He travelled to Sri Lanka from April 4 to 6, again on an invitation from the Sri Lankan Prime Minister. His visit to Saudi Arabia took place from April 22 to 23, on the invitation of the Crown Prince. Information received indicates that the total expenditure on these trips exceeded Rs 10 crore; however, the Indian embassy in Thailand refused to disclose any information under the RTI Act.
In Sri Lanka, hotel accommodation alone cost Rs 2,21,49,465. As a state guest, Prime Minister Modi could have availed of accommodation provided by the Sri Lankan government. Alternatively, he could have stayed at the Indian embassy premises, thereby saving Indian taxpayers this substantial expense. According to the embassy official in Sri Lanka, transport alone cost over Rs 1 crore. Including media and IT expenses, daily allowances, flag poles, and stationery, the total expenditure incurred by the Indian embassy in Sri Lanka for the Prime Minister’s visit amounted to Rs 4,46,21,690.
In Saudi Arabia, hotel charges were relatively modest—just over Rs 4 lakh. Nevertheless, even this amount could have been avoided had the Prime Minister opted to stay in the embassy’s guest rooms or accepted the hospitality offered by the host nation. The major expense head in Saudi Arabia was transport, on which the embassy spent over Rs 4 crore. These costs could have been significantly reduced had the Prime Minister agreed to use vehicles already available with the embassy.
In his RTI application, Commodore Batra attached a reply to a question raised in Parliament by Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge, seeking details of the expenses incurred on Prime Minister Modi’s foreign trips. A response in the Rajya Sabha dated March 20, 2025, revealed that Rs 10,74,27,363 was spent on Modi’s trip to the US in 2011. Over Rs 9 crore was spent on his 2013 trip to Russia, and over Rs 8 crore on his visit to France in 2011. His visit to Germany in 2013 cost India more than Rs 6 crore.
The Rajya Sabha reply also provided a breakdown of expenses under various heads. Among them were “venue charges,” including over Rs 2 crore spent under this head in Germany in 2022. Such charges could easily be avoided if the Prime Minister refrains from addressing large crowds in hired venues abroad.
No information was shared about the expenses incurred by the Indian embassy in Thailand for the Prime Minister’s April 2025 visit. In a response dated July 11, 2025, the Public Information Officer of the Indian Embassy in Bangkok wrote: “As the disclosure of information would prejudicially affect the security and strategic interests of India, it is informed that disclosing information regarding expenditure of foreign engagement of the Prime Minister may not be feasible under the provision of Section 8 (1) (a) and (j) of the RTI Act 2005.”
Section 8(1)(a) of the RTI Act pertains to information that could potentially affect the sovereignty and integrity of India, while Section 8(1)(j) bars the disclosure of information related to personal life. 
The embassy’s refusal to disclose even basic expenditure figures appears opaque. 
---
*Freelance journalist 

Comments

TRENDING

Delhi Jal Board under fire as CAG finds 55% groundwater unfit for consumption

By A Representative   A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India audit report tabled in the Delhi Legislative Assembly on 7 January 2026 has revealed alarming lapses in the quality and safety of drinking water supplied by the Delhi Jal Board (DJB), raising serious public health concerns for residents of the capital. 

Advocacy group decries 'hyper-centralization' as States’ share of health funds plummets

By A Representative   In a major pre-budget mobilization, the Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA), India’s leading public health advocacy network, has issued a sharp critique of the Union government’s health spending and demanded a doubling of the health budget for the upcoming 2026-27 fiscal year. 

Pairing not with law but with perpetrators: Pavlovian response to lynchings in India

By Vikash Narain Rai* Lynch-law owes its name to James Lynch, the legendary Warden of Galway, Ireland, who tried, condemned and executed his own son in 1493 for defrauding and killing strangers. But, today, what kind of a person will justify the lynching for any reason whatsoever? Will perhaps resemble the proverbial ‘wrong man to meet at wrong road at night!’

Stands 'exposed': Cavalier attitude towards rushed construction of Char Dham project

By Bharat Dogra*  The nation heaved a big sigh of relief when the 41 workers trapped in the under-construction Silkyara-Barkot tunnel (Uttarkashi district of Uttarakhand) were finally rescued on November 28 after a 17-day rescue effort. All those involved in the rescue effort deserve a big thanks of the entire country. The government deserves appreciation for providing all-round support.

Iswar Chandra Vidyasagar’s views on religion as Tagore’s saw them

By Harasankar Adhikari   Religion has become a visible subject in India’s public discourse, particularly where it intersects with political debate. Recent events, including a mass Gita chanting programme in Kolkata and other incidents involving public expressions of faith, have drawn attention to how religion features in everyday life. These developments have raised questions about the relationship between modern technological progress and traditional religious practice.

Jayanthi Natarajan "never stood by tribals' rights" in MNC Vedanta's move to mine Niyamigiri Hills in Odisha

By A Representative The Odisha Chapter of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity (CSD), which played a vital role in the struggle for the enactment of historic Forest Rights Act, 2006 has blamed former Union environment minister Jaynaynthi Natarjan for failing to play any vital role to defend the tribals' rights in the forest areas during her tenure under the former UPA government. Countering her recent statement that she rejected environmental clearance to Vendanta, the top UK-based NMC, despite tremendous pressure from her colleagues in Cabinet and huge criticism from industry, and the claim that her decision was “upheld by the Supreme Court”, the CSD said this is simply not true, and actually she "disrespected" FRA.

Zhou Enlai: The enigmatic premier who stabilized chaos—at what cost?

By Harsh Thakor*  Zhou Enlai (1898–1976) served as the first Premier of the People's Republic of China (PRC) from 1949 until his death and as Foreign Minister from 1949 to 1958. He played a central role in the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) for over five decades, contributing to its organization, military efforts, diplomacy, and governance. His tenure spanned key events including the Long March, World War II alliances, the founding of the PRC, the Korean War, and the Cultural Revolution. 

Uttarakhand tunnel disaster: 'Question mark' on rescue plan, appraisal, construction

By Bhim Singh Rawat*  As many as 40 workers were trapped inside Barkot-Silkyara tunnel in Uttarkashi after a portion of the 4.5 km long, supposedly completed portion of the tunnel, collapsed early morning on Sunday, Nov 12, 2023. The incident has once again raised several questions over negligence in planning, appraisal and construction, absence of emergency rescue plan, violations of labour laws and environmental norms resulting in this avoidable accident.

'Threat to farmers’ rights': New seeds Bill sparks fears of rising corporate control

By Bharat Dogra  As debate intensifies over a new seeds bill, groups working on farmers’ seed rights, seed sovereignty and rural self-reliance have raised serious concerns about the proposed legislation. To understand these anxieties, it is important to recognise a global trend: growing control of the seed sector by a handful of multinational companies. This trend risks extending corporate dominance across food and farming systems, jeopardising the livelihoods and rights of small farmers and raising serious ecological and health concerns. The pending bill must be assessed within this broader context.