Skip to main content

Modi, Trump, and the price of silence: Washington’s noise, New Delhi’s nod?

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* 
U.S. President Donald Trump has launched yet another barrage of statements that do little more than embarrass the U.S. administration and isolate the United States further on the global stage. His recent claim that he “stopped a war” between India and Pakistan may contain a grain of truth—especially given how both nations' leaders seem keen to remain in Washington’s good books—but it exposes deeper problems. For decades, I have maintained that Pakistan’s elite have been spinelessly obedient to U.S. interests. In fact, the country’s very creation was aimed at safeguarding colonial economic interests in South Asia.
Trump’s outbursts may hand political ammunition to India’s opposition parties, who are eager to corner Prime Minister Narendra Modi. However, obsessively focusing on events like the Balakot incident or the loss of fighter jets could be counterproductive. These are issues that are better exposed by independent voices—like the French journalists investigating alleged corruption in the Rafale deal—rather than being used as daily political footballs.
The Indian government’s response to U.S. interference has so far been timid. While leaders in countries such as Brazil, Colombia, Cuba, and Mexico—who are quite literally in America’s backyard—are standing up to U.S. hegemony, India remains remarkably polite. Even opposition parties seem unwilling to challenge Washington’s growing impositions.
Donald Trump epitomizes a new kind of American arrogance—governing by tweet and driven more by ego than understanding. His 2016 victory was born out of domestic frustration with America’s endless foreign interventions disguised as pro-democracy missions. Yet, even his successor Joe Biden, under the pretense of countering Russia, pursued policies that proved equally dangerous. The effort to demonize Vladimir Putin backfired spectacularly. Russia is not Syria or Iran—it is a nuclear-armed global player with long-standing geopolitical concerns.
Trump’s fantasy of ending the Russia-Ukraine war “in 24 hours” was not just delusional; it showed a staggering ignorance of history and power dynamics. Meanwhile, Russian advances in eastern Ukraine continue, much of it being territory rich in rare earth elements—resources Western corporations had heavily invested in. Perhaps this is the real reason behind Trump’s visible frustration: economic interests disguised as diplomacy.
What the world is witnessing is a shift in power. Countries like Russia, China, Iran, Brazil, and North Korea are asserting themselves. India must now decide where it stands. If the U.S. continues to undermine India’s autonomy, it may inevitably push us toward strategic alternatives.
The era of unipolar dominance is over. Washington and London can no longer behave like schoolmasters in a classroom of disobedient children. We are entering a truly multipolar world where nations are demanding respect and equality—not lectures.
India must assert its sovereignty and resist U.S. and EU bullying. Western sanctions against Russia have largely failed, and recent aggressive rhetoric from some U.S. lawmakers—including calls to bomb Russia—reflects a dangerous mindset. Such statements expose the intellectual and moral decay among many Western leaders, who now seem more loyal to arms manufacturers than to peace and diplomacy.
It is time for realism and statesmanship. Global peace cannot be achieved without recognizing the complex legacies of Western colonialism. Much of today's global instability stems from borders and divisions imposed by British imperial policy, and meaningful peace will require confronting and correcting those historic injustices.
Western hypocrisy stands fully exposed when they justify the genocide in Gaza by defending Israel’s “right to self-defense” but refuse to acknowledge Russia’s own security concerns regarding NATO expansion. This selective morality has become the hallmark of Western diplomacy.
We are now at a critical juncture—perhaps the most dangerous moment since World War II. Leaders must rise to the occasion, not with bluster or bravado, but with wisdom, courage, and a genuine commitment to global justice. Let us strive for peace—not by preaching, but by listening, understanding, and correcting the wrongs of history.
---
*Human rights defender 

Comments

TRENDING

Academics urge Azim Premji University to drop FIR against Student Reading Circle

  By A Representative   A group of academics and civil society members has issued an open letter to the leadership of Azim Premji University expressing concern over the filing of a police complaint that led to an FIR against a student-run reading circle following a recent incident of violence on campus. The signatories state that they hold the university in high regard for its commitment to constitutional values, critical inquiry and ethical public engagement, and argue that it is precisely because of this reputation that the present development is troubling.

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

  By Rajiv Shah   This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

UAPA action against Telangana activist: Criminalising legitimate democratic activity?

By A Representative   The National Investigation Agency's Hyderabad branch has issued notices to more than ten individuals in Telangana in connection with FIR No. RC-04/2025. Those served include activists, former student leaders, civil rights advocates, poets, writers, retired schoolteachers, and local leaders associated with the Communist Party of India (CPI) and the Indian National Congress. 

Asbestos contamination in children’s products highlights global oversight gaps

By A Representative   A commentary published by the International Ban Asbestos Secretariat (IBAS) has drawn attention to the challenges governments face in responding effectively to global public-health risks. In an article written by Laurie Kazan-Allen and published on March 5, 2026, the author examines how the discovery of asbestos contamination in children’s play products has raised questions about regulatory oversight and international product safety. The article opens by reflecting on lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that governments in several countries were slow to respond to early warning signs of the crisis. Referring to the experience of the United Kingdom, the author writes that delays in implementing protective measures contributed to “232,112 recorded deaths and over a million people suffering from long Covid.” The commentary uses this example to illustrate what it describes as the dangers of underestimating emerging threats. Attention then turns...

The kitchen as prison: A feminist elegy for domestic slavery

By Garima Srivastava* Kumar Ambuj stands as one of the most incisive voices in contemporary Hindi poetry. His work, stripped of ornamentation, speaks directly to the lived realities of India’s marginalized—women, the rural poor, and those crushed under invisible forms of violence. His celebrated poem “Women Who Cook” (Khānā Banātī Striyāṃ) is not merely about food preparation; it is a searing indictment of patriarchal domestic structures that reduce women’s existence to endless, unpaid labour.

Aligning too closely with U.S., allies, India’s silence on IRIS Dena raises troubling questions

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The reported sinking of the Iranian ship IRIS Dena in the Indian Ocean near Sri Lanka raises troubling questions about international norms and the credibility of the so-called rule-based order. If indeed the vessel was attacked by the American Navy while returning from a joint exercise in Visakhapatnam, it would represent a serious breach of trust and a violation of the principles that govern such cooperative engagements. Warships participating in these exercises are generally not armed for combat; they are meant to symbolize solidarity and friendship. The incident, therefore, is not only shocking but also deeply ironic.

India’s foreign policy at crossroads: Cost of silence in the face of aggression

By Venkatesh Narayanan, Sandeep Pandey  The widely anticipated yet unprovoked attack on Iran on March 1 by the United States and Israel has drawn sharp criticism from several quarters around the world. Reports indicate that the strikes have resulted in significant civilian casualties, including 165 elementary school girls, 20 female volleyball players, and many other civilians. 

India’s green energy push faces talent crunch amidst record growth at 16% CAGR

By Jag Jivan*  A new study by a top consulting firm has found that India’s cleantech sector is entering a decisive growth phase, with strong policy backing, record capacity additions and surging investor interest, but facing mounting pressure on talent supply and rising compensation costs .

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".