Skip to main content

Fossil fuel phase out essential to avert human rights catastrophe, warns UN expert

In a new report presented at the 59th session of the UN Human Rights Council, Special Rapporteur Elisa Morgera has issued an urgent call for the complete defossilization of the global economy within this decade. The report, titled “The Imperative of Defossilizing Our Economies”, argues that continued fossil fuel dependence is not only accelerating climate catastrophe but constitutes a profound violation of international human rights obligations—especially to present and future generations.
The 94-page document underscores the stark reality of climate breakdown. With 2024 declared the warmest year on record and climate-induced disasters escalating in frequency and intensity, the Special Rapporteur frames the fossil fuel crisis as “intergenerational, severe and widespread” in its human rights impacts. Citing evidence that fossil fuel combustion is responsible for 81–91% of historical carbon emissions, the report says the planet’s remaining carbon budget for staying within 1.5°C of warming has already been exceeded by existing fossil infrastructure.
Despite mounting evidence, the report notes that fossil fuel production is projected to grow by 110% by 2030—completely at odds with climate goals and scientific warnings. Morgera calls this disconnect a result of “six decades of climate obstruction,” citing deliberate misinformation, political interference, and legal protections granted to fossil fuel companies that have delayed meaningful action.
The report is deeply critical of the fossil fuel industry’s “playbook” of climate obstruction, including suppression of science, judicial harassment of environmental defenders, and massive advertising campaigns downplaying harm. Morgera notes that many companies knew the damaging effects of their products as early as the 1960s but chose denial and manipulation instead of action.
Citing scientific consensus, the report calls for halting all new fossil fuel exploration and infrastructure development, decommissioning existing facilities before their end of life, and eliminating fossil fuel subsidies—estimated to be at least $1.4 trillion globally in 2023. The Special Rapporteur asserts that such subsidies violate international obligations to use maximum available resources for fulfilling human rights. She adds that the richest 20% of households in many developing countries receive six times the subsidy benefits compared to the poorest.
In addition to being the dominant source of climate change, the report paints fossil fuels as a driver of a range of systemic crises—biodiversity loss, toxic pollution, global inequality, and even armed conflict. Fossil fuels are blamed for over 8 million premature deaths annually, contamination of land and water, destruction of cultural heritage, and the creation of “sacrifice zones” where marginalized communities face disproportionate harm.
Morgera also highlights the growing threat of plastics and petrochemicals, noting that these products are embedding fossil fuel dependence across sectors beyond energy. Petrochemicals used in agriculture, especially synthetic nitrogen fertilizers, are said to drive fossil expansion and release nitrous oxide—a greenhouse gas 300 times more potent than CO₂. The report warns that plastic production could account for 50% of global oil demand by 2050.
The report criticizes the protection fossil fuel companies enjoy under investor–state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanisms, where they have been awarded over $82 billion for climate policies that allegedly hurt profits. Over 60% of such claims could arise in low- and middle-income countries, effectively penalizing those least responsible for climate change.
The report draws strong connections between fossil fuels and systemic racial, gender, and generational injustices. It notes disproportionate harm to Indigenous Peoples, people of African descent, peasants, and children. It asserts that the continued expansion of fossil fuel infrastructure violates the rights to life, health, food, water, and a healthy environment—especially for those living in vulnerable and marginalized conditions.
Calling defossilization the “single most impactful contribution to the protection of human health,” the report insists that a just transition to renewable energy must be human rights-based and equity-focused. This means prioritizing energy access for the poor, empowering affected communities, and ensuring fossil fuel workers are protected through job guarantees, social security, and meaningful participation in decision-making.
Morgera recommends that all States immediately develop defossilization plans through inclusive, participatory processes. These should include bans on new fossil exploration, fracking, offshore drilling, and fossil fuel projects in biodiversity hotspots. High-emitting nations are urged to complete the fossil fuel phaseout by 2030 and stop exporting fossil-based technologies. Developed nations are further called upon to provide financial and technological support to the Global South without locking them into fossil dependency.
The Special Rapporteur warns that failure to phase out fossil fuels violates peremptory norms of international law, including the rights to life, self-determination, and non-discrimination. Inaction, she concludes, "not only risks catastrophic and irreversible harm but fundamentally undermines the possibility of a just, equitable, and liveable future for all."

Comments

TRENDING

Dalit rights and political tensions: Why is Mevani at odds with Congress leadership?

While I have known Jignesh Mevani, one of the dozen-odd Congress MLAs from Gujarat, ever since my Gandhinagar days—when he was a young activist aligned with well-known human rights lawyer Mukul Sinha’s organisation, Jan Sangharsh Manch—he became famous following the July 2016 Una Dalit atrocity, in which seven members of a family were brutally assaulted by self-proclaimed cow vigilantes while skinning a dead cow, a traditional occupation among Dalits.  

Global NGO slams India for media clampdown during conflict, downplays Pakistan

A global civil rights group, Civicus has taken strong exception to how critical commentaries during the “recent conflict” with Pakistan were censored in India, with journalists getting “targeted”. I have no quarrel with the Civicus view, as the facts mentioned in it are all true.

Whither SCOPE? Twelve years on, Gujarat’s official English remains frozen in time

While writing my previous blog on how and why Narendra Modi went out of his way to promote English when he was Gujarat chief minister — despite opposition from people in the Sangh Parivar — I came across an interesting write-up by Aakar Patel, a well-known name among journalists and civil society circles.

Remembering Vijay Rupani: A quiet BJP leader who listened beyond party lines

Late evening on June 12, a senior sociologist of Indian origin, who lives in Vienna, asked me a pointed question: Of the 241 persons who died as a result of the devastating plane crash in Ahmedabad the other day, did I know anyone? I had no hesitation in telling her: former Gujarat chief minister Vijay Rupani, whom I described to her as "one of the more sensible persons in the BJP leadership."

Unchecked urbanisation, waste dumping: Study warns of 'invited disaster' as khadi floods threaten half of Surat

An action research report, “Invited Disaster: Khadi Floods in Surat City”, published by two civil rights groups, Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti and the People's Union for Civil Liberties, Surat, states that nearly half of Gujarat's top urban conglomerate—known for its concentration of textile and diamond polishing industries—is affected by the dumping of debris and solid waste, along with the release of treated and untreated sewage into the khadis (rivulets), thereby increasing the risk of flood disaster.

Polymath academy or echo chamber? A personal take on knowledge, control, and WhatsApp moderation

A few months back, I was made a member of a WhatsApp group called Polymath Academy. Frankly, I didn’t know what the word polymath meant until its administrator, veteran Gujarat-based sociologist Vidyut Joshi — with whom I have been interacting since the mid-1990s when he was with the Gandhi Labour Institute — told me it refers to a person with an exceptional academic record.

Two decades on, hunger still haunts Gujarat: Survey exposes stark gap behind poverty claims

A Niti Aayog report , released about two years ago, estimated that in Gujarat — which our powers-that-be have long considered a model state — 11.66% of people are "multidimensionally poor," a term referring to an index that seeks to estimate "multiple and simultaneous deprivations" at the household level across three macro categories: health, education, and living standards.

English proficiency for empowerment: Modi’s SCOPE vision contrasts Amit Shah’s remark

While Union Home Minister Amit Shah may have asserted that soon a time would come when those speaking English in the country would “feel ashamed”, it is ironic that Narendra Modi, when he was Gujarat chief minister, had launched what was called the SCOPE programme, actively involving the University of Cambridge to provide opportunities to the youth of Gujarat to "become not just job seekers but job creators (entrepreneurs)."

Whither whistleblower concerns? Air India crash: Govt of India report suggests human error

Is the Ministry of Civil Aviation, Government of India, seeking to bail out Boeing in its preliminary report released recently despite the top MNC's whistleblower concerns ? It would seem so, if the Ministry's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau's (AAIB's) preliminary findings into the catastrophic crash of Air India’s Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner, registration VT-ANB, which went down shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad on 12 June 2025, killing all 241 on board and 19 on the ground, is any indication.