Skip to main content

Fossil fuel phase out essential to avert human rights catastrophe, warns UN expert

 
By Rajiv Shah 
In a new report presented at the 59th session of the UN Human Rights Council, Special Rapporteur Elisa Morgera has issued an urgent call for the complete defossilization of the global economy within this decade. The report, titled “The Imperative of Defossilizing Our Economies”, argues that continued fossil fuel dependence is not only accelerating climate catastrophe but constitutes a profound violation of international human rights obligations—especially to present and future generations.
The 94-page document underscores the stark reality of climate breakdown. With 2024 declared the warmest year on record and climate-induced disasters escalating in frequency and intensity, the Special Rapporteur frames the fossil fuel crisis as “intergenerational, severe and widespread” in its human rights impacts. Citing evidence that fossil fuel combustion is responsible for 81–91% of historical carbon emissions, the report says the planet’s remaining carbon budget for staying within 1.5°C of warming has already been exceeded by existing fossil infrastructure.
Despite mounting evidence, the report notes that fossil fuel production is projected to grow by 110% by 2030—completely at odds with climate goals and scientific warnings. Morgera calls this disconnect a result of “six decades of climate obstruction,” citing deliberate misinformation, political interference, and legal protections granted to fossil fuel companies that have delayed meaningful action.
The report is deeply critical of the fossil fuel industry’s “playbook” of climate obstruction, including suppression of science, judicial harassment of environmental defenders, and massive advertising campaigns downplaying harm. Morgera notes that many companies knew the damaging effects of their products as early as the 1960s but chose denial and manipulation instead of action.
Citing scientific consensus, the report calls for halting all new fossil fuel exploration and infrastructure development, decommissioning existing facilities before their end of life, and eliminating fossil fuel subsidies—estimated to be at least $1.4 trillion globally in 2023. The Special Rapporteur asserts that such subsidies violate international obligations to use maximum available resources for fulfilling human rights. She adds that the richest 20% of households in many developing countries receive six times the subsidy benefits compared to the poorest.
In addition to being the dominant source of climate change, the report paints fossil fuels as a driver of a range of systemic crises—biodiversity loss, toxic pollution, global inequality, and even armed conflict. Fossil fuels are blamed for over 8 million premature deaths annually, contamination of land and water, destruction of cultural heritage, and the creation of “sacrifice zones” where marginalized communities face disproportionate harm.
Morgera also highlights the growing threat of plastics and petrochemicals, noting that these products are embedding fossil fuel dependence across sectors beyond energy. Petrochemicals used in agriculture, especially synthetic nitrogen fertilizers, are said to drive fossil expansion and release nitrous oxide—a greenhouse gas 300 times more potent than CO₂. The report warns that plastic production could account for 50% of global oil demand by 2050.
The report criticizes the protection fossil fuel companies enjoy under investor–state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanisms, where they have been awarded over $82 billion for climate policies that allegedly hurt profits. Over 60% of such claims could arise in low- and middle-income countries, effectively penalizing those least responsible for climate change.
The report draws strong connections between fossil fuels and systemic racial, gender, and generational injustices. It notes disproportionate harm to Indigenous Peoples, people of African descent, peasants, and children. It asserts that the continued expansion of fossil fuel infrastructure violates the rights to life, health, food, water, and a healthy environment—especially for those living in vulnerable and marginalized conditions.
Calling defossilization the “single most impactful contribution to the protection of human health,” the report insists that a just transition to renewable energy must be human rights-based and equity-focused. This means prioritizing energy access for the poor, empowering affected communities, and ensuring fossil fuel workers are protected through job guarantees, social security, and meaningful participation in decision-making.
Morgera recommends that all States immediately develop defossilization plans through inclusive, participatory processes. These should include bans on new fossil exploration, fracking, offshore drilling, and fossil fuel projects in biodiversity hotspots. High-emitting nations are urged to complete the fossil fuel phaseout by 2030 and stop exporting fossil-based technologies. Developed nations are further called upon to provide financial and technological support to the Global South without locking them into fossil dependency.
The Special Rapporteur warns that failure to phase out fossil fuels violates peremptory norms of international law, including the rights to life, self-determination, and non-discrimination. Inaction, she concludes, "not only risks catastrophic and irreversible harm but fundamentally undermines the possibility of a just, equitable, and liveable future for all."

Comments

TRENDING

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

What's behind Donald Trump's 'narco-state' accusation against Venezuela

By Manolo De Los Santos  The US government has revived its campaign to label Venezuela a "narco-state", accusing its top leadership of drug trafficking and slapping hefty bounties on their heads for capture. This campaign, which only momentarily took a backseat, is a strategic fabrication, not a factual assessment. This accusation, particularly amplified under the Trump Administration, is a calculated smokescreen to justify a long-standing agenda: the overthrow of the Venezuelan government and the seizure of its vast oil and mineral resources. A closer examination of the facts reveals a country that has actively fought drug trafficking on its own terms and a US government with a clear and consistent history of destabilizing independent countries in Latin America.

Two more "aadhaar-linked" Jharkhand deaths: 17 die of starvation since Sept 2017

Kaleshwar's sons Santosh and Mantosh Counterview Desk A fact-finding team of the Right to Feed Campaign, pointing towards the death of two more persons due to starvation in Jharkhand, has said that this has happened because of the absence of aadhaar, leading to “persistent lack of food at home and unavailability of any means of earning.” It has disputed the state government claims that these deaths are due to reasons other than starvation, adding, the authorities have “done nothing” to reduce the alarming state of food insecurity in the state.

1857 War of Independence... when Hindu-Muslim separatism, hatred wasn't an issue

"The Sepoy Revolt at Meerut", Illustrated London News, 1857  By Shamsul Islam* Large sections of Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs unitedly challenged the greatest imperialist power, Britain, during India’s First War of Independence which began on May 10, 1857; the day being Sunday. This extraordinary unity, naturally, unnerved the firangees and made them realize that if their rule was to continue in India, it could happen only when Hindus and Muslims, the largest two religious communities were divided on communal lines.

New RTI draft rules inspired by citizen-unfriendly, overtly bureaucratic approach

By Venkatesh Nayak* The Department of Personnel and Training , Government of India has invited comments on a new set of Draft Rules (available in English only) to implement The Right to Information Act, 2005 . The RTI Rules were last amended in 2012 after a long period of consultation with various stakeholders. The Government’s move to put the draft RTI Rules out for people’s comments and suggestions for change is a welcome continuation of the tradition of public consultation. Positive aspects of the Draft RTI Rules While 60-65% of the Draft RTI Rules repeat the content of the 2012 RTI Rules, some new aspects deserve appreciation as they clarify the manner of implementation of key provisions of the RTI Act. These are: Provisions for dealing with non-compliance of the orders and directives of the Central Information Commission (CIC) by public authorities- this was missing in the 2012 RTI Rules. Non-compliance is increasingly becoming a major problem- two of my non-compliance cases are...

Epic war against caste system is constitutional responsibility of elected government

Edited by well-known Gujarat Dalit rights leader Martin Macwan, the book, “Bhed-Bharat: An Account of Injustice and Atrocities on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-18)” (available in English and Gujarati*) is a selection of news articles on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-2018) published by Dalit Shakti Prakashan, Ahmedabad. Preface to the book, in which Macwan seeks to answer key questions on why the book is needed today: *** The thought of compiling a book on atrocities on Dalits and thus present an overall Indian picture had occurred to me a long time ago. Absence of such a comprehensive picture is a major reason for a weak social and political consciousness among Dalits as well as non-Dalits. But gradually the idea took a different form. I found that lay readers don’t understand numbers and don’t like to read well-researched articles. The best way to reach out to them was storytelling. As I started writing in Gujarati and sharing the idea of the book with my friends, it occurred to me that while...

N-power plant at Mithi Virdi: CRZ nod is arbitrary, without jurisdiction

By Krishnakant* A case-appeal has been filed against the order of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) and others granting CRZ clearance for establishment of intake and outfall facility for proposed 6000 MWe Nuclear Power Plant at Mithi Virdi, District Bhavnagar, Gujarat by Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) vide order in F 11-23 /2014-IA- III dated March 3, 2015. The case-appeal in the National Green Tribunal at Western Bench at Pune is filed by Shaktisinh Gohil, Sarpanch of Jasapara; Hajabhai Dihora of Mithi Virdi; Jagrutiben Gohil of Jasapara; Krishnakant and Rohit Prajapati activist of the Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti. The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has issued a notice to the MoEF&CC, Gujarat Pollution Control Board, Gujarat Coastal Zone Management Authority, Atomic Energy Regulatory Board and Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) and case is kept for hearing on August 20, 2015. Appeal No. 23 of 2015 (WZ) is filed, a...

Ground reality: Israel would a remain Jewish state, attempt to overthrow it will be futile

By NS Venkataraman*  Now that truce has been arrived at between Israel and Hamas for a period of four days and with release of a few hostages from both sides, there is hope that truce would be further extended and the intensity of war would become significantly less. This likely “truce period” gives an opportunity for the sworn supporters and bitter opponents of Hamas as well as Israel and the observers around the world to introspect on the happenings and whether this war could have been avoided. There is prolonged debate for the last several decades as to whom the present region that has been provided to Jews after the World War II belong. View of some people is that Jews have been occupants earlier and therefore, the region should belong to Jews only. However, Christians and those belonging to Islam have also lived in this regions for long period. While Christians make no claim, the dispute is between Jews and those who claim themselves to be Palestinians. In any case...

Fate of Yamuna floodplain still hangs in "balance" despite National Green Tribunal rap on Sri Sri event

By Ashok Shrimali* While the National Green Tribunal (NGT) on Thursday reportedly pulled up the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) for granting permission to hold spiritual guru Sri Sri Ravi Shankar's World Culture Festival on the banks of Yamuna, the chief petitioners against the high-profile event Yamuna Jiye Abhiyan has declared, the “fate of the floodplain still hangs in balance.”