Government withholds blocking orders on 8,000 social media accounts, digital news sites, RTI replies show

The Government of India has refused to disclose any information under the Right to Information (RTI) Act related to its controversial decision to block over 8,000 social media accounts—mostly on X (formerly Twitter)—during Operation Sindoor, as well as to restrict access to several digital news platforms, including The Wire, in early May.

The denials come in response to an RTI application filed on May 12, 2025, by Venkatesh Nayak, Director of the Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (CHRI), who sought official documents justifying the blocking of social media accounts and news websites. The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MEITy) and the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (MoIB) both declined to provide the requested information, citing Section 8(1)(a) of the RTI Act, which pertains to national security exemptions.

“These responses are disappointing and go against the transparency obligations of the government,” said Nayak. “Both ministries have in the past issued press releases when they ordered blocking of content. Now, even that practice has come to an end. This is a serious setback to public accountability.”

Background: Blocking Spree Under Operation Sindoor

The issue first came to light through media reports in early May when X (formerly Twitter) confirmed that it had received executive orders from the Indian government to block around 8,000 accounts. Many of these accounts allegedly belonged to independent journalists, activists, and critics of the government’s handling of security operations in Jammu and Kashmir. Digital news portals, including The Wire, also confirmed that their platforms were temporarily inaccessible in India.

"Our site was rendered inaccessible without prior notice or explanation. It was later restored, again without any communication,” The Wire said in a public statement.

Despite the major public interest implications, MEITy refused to share the blocking orders, the list of affected accounts, or the legal basis for such mass censorship. In its reply, the ministry cited confidentiality provisions in the Information Technology Act and its associated rules, and claimed exemption under national security clauses of the RTI Act. The reply also included a copy of the IT Rules but not the orders or documents themselves. MEITy transferred the request to the MoIB, which can also issue takedown orders under its jurisdiction.

Ministry of I&B Denies Records Too

The MoIB, however, provided conflicting responses. On June 24, one Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) from the Media Unit Cell-I replied that no records were available related to the RTI request. Another CPIO, in a separate response, cited Section 8(1)(a) of the RTI Act again—without elaborating which specific grounds under that section were being invoked, a requirement under Indian transparency law.

“This kind of blanket exemption and lack of specificity violates the spirit and the letter of the RTI Act,” Nayak said. “The law is clear that exemptions must be applied narrowly and with reasoning. Simply saying ‘national security’ isn’t enough—especially when past governments have shared at least the fact of such orders.”

Experts Flag Pattern of Digital Opacity

Digital rights experts say this RTI rejection is part of a growing trend of opacity around online censorship in India, where content takedown orders have increased significantly in recent years but are rarely made public.

According to data from the Software Freedom Law Center, India has seen a 600% increase in content blocking orders since 2014, most of them passed without judicial oversight or public disclosure. The Internet Freedom Foundation has long advocated for pre-legislative consultation and publishing of takedown orders, especially when they affect freedom of expression, press freedom, and citizens’ access to information.

Next Steps

Venkatesh Nayak confirmed he will challenge the denials through RTI first appeals and, if necessary, the Central Information Commission (CIC), calling the ministries’ responses “an attempt to cloak executive overreach in secrecy.”

“It is unacceptable that democratic governments resort to secret censorship without explanation or recourse. If these orders are lawful, why are they afraid to make them public?” Nayak asked.

The blocking of journalists’ and media platforms’ accounts—particularly without public disclosure—raises serious constitutional questions under Articles 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(g) of the Indian Constitution, which protect freedom of speech and media independence.

As of now, the full scope of the government’s censorship actions during Operation Sindoor remains unknown. But Nayak’s intervention has put a renewed spotlight on the urgent need for transparency in digital governance, especially when state actions affect fundamental rights.

Comments

Dalit rights and political tensions: Why is Mevani at odds with Congress leadership?

While I have known Jignesh Mevani, one of the dozen-odd Congress MLAs from Gujarat, ever since my Gandhinagar days—when he was a young activist aligned with well-known human rights lawyer Mukul Sinha’s organisation, Jan Sangharsh Manch—he became famous following the July 2016 Una Dalit atrocity, in which seven members of a family were brutally assaulted by self-proclaimed cow vigilantes while skinning a dead cow, a traditional occupation among Dalits.

Boeing 787 under scrutiny again after Ahmedabad crash: Whistleblower warnings resurface

A heart-wrenching tragedy has taken place in Ahmedabad. As widely reported, a Boeing 787 Dreamliner plane crashed shortly after taking off from the city’s airport, currently operated by India’s top tycoon, Gautam Adani. The aircraft was carrying 230 passengers and 12 crew members. As expected, the crash has led to an outpouring of grief across the country. At the same time, there have been demands for the resignation of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Home Minister Amit Shah, and the Civil Aviation Minister.

Global NGO slams India for media clampdown during conflict, downplays Pakistan

A global civil rights group, Civicus has taken strong exception to how critical commentaries during the “recent conflict” with Pakistan were censored in India, with journalists getting “targeted”. I have no quarrel with the Civicus view, as the facts mentioned in it are all true.

Whither SCOPE? Twelve years on, Gujarat’s official English remains frozen in time

While writing my previous blog on how and why Narendra Modi went out of his way to promote English when he was Gujarat chief minister — despite opposition from people in the Sangh Parivar — I came across an interesting write-up by Aakar Patel, a well-known name among journalists and civil society circles.

Remembering Vijay Rupani: A quiet BJP leader who listened beyond party lines

Late evening on June 12, a senior sociologist of Indian origin, who lives in Vienna, asked me a pointed question: Of the 241 persons who died as a result of the devastating plane crash in Ahmedabad the other day, did I know anyone? I had no hesitation in telling her: former Gujarat chief minister Vijay Rupani, whom I described to her as "one of the more sensible persons in the BJP leadership."

Why India’s renewable energy sector struggles under 2,735 compliance hurdles

Recently, during a conversation with an industry representative, I was told how easy it is to set up a startup in Singapore compared to India. This gentleman, who had recently visited Singapore, explained that one of the key reasons Indians living in the Southeast Asian nation prefer establishing startups there is because the government is “extremely supportive” when it comes to obtaining clearances. “They don’t want to shift operations to India due to the large number of bureaucratic hurdles,” he remarked.

Guha plans book to counter Dalit, Marxist, and right-wing critics of Gandhi, recalls Modi’s 'pernicious lie' on Patel

Let me first confess: writing about an event three weeks after it has taken place is no good, especially for a newsperson. However, ever since I attended the public lecture by well-known historian Ramachandra Guha on May 18, organised by Sarthak Prakashan for the release of the Gujarati edition of his book monumental book "India After Gandhi", frankly, I kept wondering if he had said anything newsworthy apart from what had already appeared in the media ever since the book's first edition came out in 2007. Call it my inertia or whatever.

Unchecked urbanisation, waste dumping: Study warns of 'invited disaster' as khadi floods threaten half of Surat

An action research report, “Invited Disaster: Khadi Floods in Surat City”, published by two civil rights groups, Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti and the People's Union for Civil Liberties, Surat, states that nearly half of Gujarat's top urban conglomerate—known for its concentration of textile and diamond polishing industries—is affected by the dumping of debris and solid waste, along with the release of treated and untreated sewage into the khadis (rivulets), thereby increasing the risk of flood disaster.

Two decades on, hunger still haunts Gujarat: Survey exposes stark gap behind poverty claims

A Niti Aayog report , released about two years ago, estimated that in Gujarat — which our powers-that-be have long considered a model state — 11.66% of people are "multidimensionally poor," a term referring to an index that seeks to estimate "multiple and simultaneous deprivations" at the household level across three macro categories: health, education, and living standards.

Search This Blog