Skip to main content

Organic food stakeholders oppose FSSAI's proposed regulatory changes, warn against undermining small farmers

 
Over 130 signatories representing India’s organic farming community have submitted a strongly worded letter to the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), objecting to key proposals discussed at a hybrid meeting held by the authority on May 7, 2025. The meeting, convened to review the Food Safety and Standards (Organic Foods) Regulations 2017, reportedly considered drastic amendments that stakeholders claim will harm small producers and the broader movement for agroecological food systems.
The letter, coordinated by the Alliance for Sustainable & Holistic Agriculture (ASHA-Kisan Swaraj), expresses alarm over three critical proposals allegedly placed on the table: the removal of exemptions granted to small original organic producers and producer organisations with turnovers below ₹12 lakh per annum; the elimination of exemptions for aggregators and intermediaries selling directly to consumers with turnover below ₹50 lakh; and the deletion of Regulation 4(1)(iii), which currently allows for notification of additional standards and systems beyond NPOP and PGS-India.
Stakeholders accuse FSSAI of overstepping its mandate, asserting that the authority is attempting to regulate farming operations—something explicitly excluded under Section 18(3) of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. “Organic certification is a quality assurance mechanism for farming practices, not a food safety issue per se,” the letter states, emphasizing that fake organic products, while potentially misleading, are not inherently unsafe compared to conventional food grown with agrochemicals.
The signatories argue that the informal, uncertified organic sector remains a major part of India’s organic market and plays a critical role in advancing food safety and sustainability. They cite APEDA’s 2023 data that pegs India’s organic market at ₹16,800 crore, with nearly ₹6,340 crore worth of organic produce sold as conventional due to lack of certification infrastructure. “Instead of strengthening and expanding quality assurance systems, FSSAI’s proposals will further choke the organic movement,” the letter warns.
Data from certification regimes are also presented to underscore the crisis in access and effectiveness. The number of active Regional Councils under PGS-India has dropped dramatically from 371 in 2018 to just 77 today, with only 2.1 lakh farmers certified. Under NPOP, only 13.6 lakh farmers—mainly through group certification—are covered, out of an estimated 1.14 crore organic practitioners in India. The letter highlights serious gaps in both regimes and criticizes FSSAI for failing to recognize alternative certification systems like PGS-OC or CETARA.
The stakeholders insist that the proposed changes will disproportionately affect small food business operators, most of whom shifted to organic farming based on government support and public interest. They urge FSSAI to preserve current exemptions, issue a fresh advisory reiterating the enabling nature of the regulations, and notify multiple quality assurance systems to serve diverse farmer needs without confusing consumers.
The letter was signed by Sreedevi Lakshmikutty of ASHA-Kisan Swaraj and endorsed by over 130 organisations and individuals. A copy has also been sent to Union Agriculture Minister Shivraj Singh Chauhan. 
ASHA-Kisan Swaraj has been a leading voice in promoting sustainable agriculture and has played a key role in shaping India’s organic food policies. The group warns that the proposed FSSAI amendments, if adopted, could derail years of progress toward safer, more ecologically responsible farming.

Comments

TRENDING

Dalit rights and political tensions: Why is Mevani at odds with Congress leadership?

While I have known Jignesh Mevani, one of the dozen-odd Congress MLAs from Gujarat, ever since my Gandhinagar days—when he was a young activist aligned with well-known human rights lawyer Mukul Sinha’s organisation, Jan Sangharsh Manch—he became famous following the July 2016 Una Dalit atrocity, in which seven members of a family were brutally assaulted by self-proclaimed cow vigilantes while skinning a dead cow, a traditional occupation among Dalits.  

Boeing 787 under scrutiny again after Ahmedabad crash: Whistleblower warnings resurface

A heart-wrenching tragedy has taken place in Ahmedabad. As widely reported, a Boeing 787 Dreamliner plane crashed shortly after taking off from the city’s airport, currently operated by India’s top tycoon, Gautam Adani. The aircraft was carrying 230 passengers and 12 crew members.  As expected, the crash has led to an outpouring of grief across the country. At the same time, there have been demands for the resignation of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Home Minister Amit Shah, and the Civil Aviation Minister.

Global NGO slams India for media clampdown during conflict, downplays Pakistan

A global civil rights group, Civicus has taken strong exception to how critical commentaries during the “recent conflict” with Pakistan were censored in India, with journalists getting “targeted”. I have no quarrel with the Civicus view, as the facts mentioned in it are all true.

Whither SCOPE? Twelve years on, Gujarat’s official English remains frozen in time

While writing my previous blog on how and why Narendra Modi went out of his way to promote English when he was Gujarat chief minister — despite opposition from people in the Sangh Parivar — I came across an interesting write-up by Aakar Patel, a well-known name among journalists and civil society circles.

Remembering Vijay Rupani: A quiet BJP leader who listened beyond party lines

Late evening on June 12, a senior sociologist of Indian origin, who lives in Vienna, asked me a pointed question: Of the 241 persons who died as a result of the devastating plane crash in Ahmedabad the other day, did I know anyone? I had no hesitation in telling her: former Gujarat chief minister Vijay Rupani, whom I described to her as "one of the more sensible persons in the BJP leadership."

Why India’s renewable energy sector struggles under 2,735 compliance hurdles

Recently, during a conversation with an industry representative, I was told how easy it is to set up a startup in Singapore compared to India. This gentleman, who had recently visited Singapore, explained that one of the key reasons Indians living in the Southeast Asian nation prefer establishing startups there is because the government is “extremely supportive” when it comes to obtaining clearances. “They don’t want to shift operations to India due to the large number of bureaucratic hurdles,” he remarked.

Guha plans book to counter Dalit, Marxist, and right-wing critics of Gandhi, recalls Modi’s 'pernicious lie' on Patel

Let me first confess: writing about an event three weeks after it has taken place is no good, especially for a newsperson. However, ever since I attended the public lecture by well-known historian Ramachandra Guha on May 18, organised by Sarthak Prakashan for the release of the Gujarati edition of his book monumental book "India After Gandhi", frankly, I kept wondering if he had said anything newsworthy apart from what had already appeared in the media ever since the book's first edition came out in 2007. Call it my inertia or whatever.

Unchecked urbanisation, waste dumping: Study warns of 'invited disaster' as khadi floods threaten half of Surat

An action research report, “Invited Disaster: Khadi Floods in Surat City”, published by two civil rights groups, Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti and the People's Union for Civil Liberties, Surat, states that nearly half of Gujarat's top urban conglomerate—known for its concentration of textile and diamond polishing industries—is affected by the dumping of debris and solid waste, along with the release of treated and untreated sewage into the khadis (rivulets), thereby increasing the risk of flood disaster.

Two decades on, hunger still haunts Gujarat: Survey exposes stark gap behind poverty claims

A Niti Aayog report , released about two years ago, estimated that in Gujarat — which our powers-that-be have long considered a model state — 11.66% of people are "multidimensionally poor," a term referring to an index that seeks to estimate "multiple and simultaneous deprivations" at the household level across three macro categories: health, education, and living standards.