Skip to main content

Farmers groups oppose private seed regimes, demand revamp of seed laws at Hyderabad meet

By A Representative
 
Participants at a national workshop on Farmers’ Rights and Collective Bio-Cultural Heritage, held in Hyderabad on July 1-2, have strongly opposed the growing influence of private corporations and international regimes over India’s seed systems. Organized by the Bharat Beej Swaraj Manch (BBSM), the workshop culminated in a joint statement that called for a complete overhaul of the country’s legal and policy framework governing seeds and farmers’ rights.
The statement declared seeds and plants as life forms and part of India’s national bio-cultural heritage, rejecting any form of individual or corporate ownership over them. “Seeds cannot be treated as private property,” the statement asserted, adding that farmers, not corporations, have historically nurtured, conserved, and improved seed varieties through generations.
BBSM sharply criticized international frameworks such as WTO-TRIPS, UPOV, and the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA), claiming these have weakened India’s sui generis stance of rejecting patents on life forms. It flagged concerns over India being pressured into adopting restrictive treaties and trade standards that undermine farmers’ rights in the name of innovation.
Participants also demanded a critical review of the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Act (PPV&FRA), pointing to several flaws in its implementation. They alleged that individual registrations of community-developed seed varieties and lawsuits against farmers under the Act violate the principle of collective bio-cultural heritage.
Of particular concern was the release of gene-edited rice varieties by the Government of India in May 2025. BBSM called for an immediate withdrawal of these varieties, terming gene editing “a form of genetic engineering” that threatens natural germplasm and community rights over seeds.
Among the key demands raised were:
- A review and revamp of the PPV&FR Act focusing on farmers’ rights.
- Creation of a national register of plant varieties conserved in Indian research institutions.
- Repatriation of seed collections to local communities for in-situ conservation.
- A ban on gene-edited and genetically modified seeds in India.
The group also resolved to intensify campaigns for traditional seed conservation, agroecological practices, and community-led agricultural innovation. It announced plans to continue organizing seed festivals as platforms for education, advocacy, and knowledge exchange.
Signatories to the statement included over 30 well-known seed savers, scientists, and activists such as Jacob Nellithanam, Dr. D. Narasimha Reddy, Anupam Paul, Shalini Bhutani, Dr. GV Ramanjaneyulu, and Bhairav Saini.

Comments

TRENDING

To Sonam Wangchuk: 'Will undertake 70 hour solidarity fast in Gujarat'

By Martin Macwan *  Dear Colleague Sonam Wangchuk, I have never met you personally. I wrote a short article at the time of your arrest. Your work correctly introduces you. There is truth in your words. You have embarked on a fast, following the footsteps of Gandhiji. Your intention is to make people think. Your demand is reasonable; I believe that the resignation of a single education minister will not improve the state of education in India. However, the question you have raised is extremely important for the future generation of the marginalized. Education is the key to power, development, and progress, which empowers a citizen.

US civil society coalition slams Hudson Institute for hosting RSS leaders

By A Representative   The Hudson Institute ’s “New India Conference,” held on April 23, featured senior figures from India’s ruling political ecosystem, including RSS General Secretary Dattatreya Hosabale and BJP foreign affairs head Vijay Chauthaiwale . The event also included U.S. officials and former diplomats such as Kurt Campbell, Kenneth Juster, and Nisha Biswal, alongside India’s Ambassador to the U.S., Vinay Kwatra.  

Remembering Rampur ka Tiraha: State violence and the birth of Uttarakhand’s struggle

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  In the turbulent political landscape of the early 1990s, India witnessed events that reshaped its social and regional equations. After the Babri Masjid demolition in 1992, Uttar Pradesh politics shifted dramatically, bringing the Samajwadi Party–Bahujan Samaj Party coalition to power in 1993 under Mulayam Singh Yadav. But the partnership was uneasy. Mulayam was never entirely comfortable playing the “Mandal card.” While Kanshi Ram and the BSP had consistently demanded the implementation of the Mandal Commission recommendations, Mulayam hesitated, wary of how the move might play out.