Skip to main content

Pesticides endorsed? Business Standard ad on foreign funded NGOs malicious: Activists

By Our Representative
In a sharp rebuttal to a full-page advertorial published in the daily “Business Standard” (July 29), more than 160 academics, activists and NGOs, many of them working in the environmental field, have said that the content the advertorial by the all-India pesticides and chemical fertilizer industry body, Crop Care Federation of India (CCFI), is “malafide as it seeks to promote harmful agricultural practices detrimental to public interest.”
Written by Nirmala Pathrawal, executive director, CCFI, the advertorial seeks to attack “foreign funded environmental NGOs” for refusing to talk about “the sunny side of Indian agriculture”, adding, “Over the years, they have so aggressively articulated scary stories and negative narratives about Indian agriculture in the public domain that it has got focused firmly in the minds of the people.”
Calling the NGO allegation that Indian farmers use excessive agrochemicals “disinformation campaign”, the advertorial says, “Their agenda is to adversely affect the export competitiveness of Indian agricultural commodities by scare mongering.”
Among the scholars and activists, the advertorial sharply accuses well-known environmentalist Sunita Narain of the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE), based in New Delhi, for receiving Rs 265 crore foreign funds over the last five years in order to keep saying that “cancer in Punjab remain high on account of intensive agriculture and use of pesticides”, which is "utterly baseless and totally false."
It also attacks ex-Greenpeace activist Kavitha Kuruganti – currently associated with a volunteer-driven informal network committed to Indian farmers’ rights, Alliance for Sustainable & Holistic Agriculture (ASHA) -- for having “unrestricted access” to “confidential documents”, suggesting the type of access influence these NGOs have in the administration.
The advertorial criticizes “organic farming” which till about 50 years ago had led to “short supplies of foods” leading “starvation deaths” around the world, including India, insisting, “The Irish Potato Farming and the Great Chinese Famine were caused due to pest/disease outbreak and lack of agri inputs, mainly pesticides.”
The advertorial cites how in 1959 China attempted to introduce countrywide organic farming, but finding that it was a “disaster”, it abandoned it, claiming, “Today, China accounts for nearly 30% of world's agricultural production” and is also “the largest consumer of pesticides and fertilisers.”
It underlines, “Organic farming can at best be a small and niche market segment. The claim of the foreign funded environmental activist NGOs that our soil, environment and water have become degraded, polluted and unproductive due to excess use of chemical inputs are all wrong.”
The rebuttal to the advertorial by 160 plus activists, scholars and NGOs follows a strongly-worded critique the advertorial by Kavitha Kuruganti, who in a blog addressed to the "Business Standard" editor, says, “CCFI might as well have accused the Prime Minister of India of scare-mongering then, when from the ramparts of the Red Fort on India’s Independence Day in 2019, he gave a clarion call to farmers to reduce and phase out agro-chemicals and save Mother Earth.”
Kavitha Kuruganti, Sunita Narain
In their statement, activists, scholars and NGOs criticize “Business Standard”, stating the daily is liable for the advertorial’s “irresponsible content”, underlining, “The publication is not only violative of journalistic ethics and guidelines of the Press Council of India but also of its own code of conduct. It is not enough to offer as an excuse that the advertorial published was not its original content.”
“The modality of publication of this content is even more dangerous if it does not offer the opportunity to refute these allegations”, the statement insists.

Text:

We are writing to condemn and call out the full-page ‘advertorial’ commissioned by ‘Crop Care Federation of India’ (CCFI) and published in Business Standard newspaper dated 29 July 2020. The content of this advertorial is malafide as it seeks to promote harmful agricultural practices detrimental to public interest.
In fact, CCFI has dubious credentials as it is an industry body of chemical manufacturing companies. It seeks to serve their corporate agenda and profit making interests at the cost of health risks to the public. That it has chosen to subserve this agenda by maligning public image of several individuals and institutions in specific, and NGOs in general, is equally malicious.
The advertorial makes a targeted attack against reputed activists, scholars, scientists as well research institutions. It attempts to discount their years of public spirited work by presenting it in a scurrilous fashion. The wild accusations made against them are derogatory and liable for legal action under the defamation law.
The advertorial maliciously imputes ulterior motives to foreign funded institutions by suggesting that their work is detrimental to the interests of the nation. The NGO sector plays a very important role of supplementing government efforts towards the well-being of people.
NGO activities and their source of funding are also closely monitored by the Government through its various entities such as Charities Commissioners, Registrar of Societies, Income Tax Department and the Ministry of Home Affairs.
In this particular case, the organisations have been researching and raising awareness about harmful effects of agrochemicals based on solid scientific research. The organisations and individuals in question have been carrying on their research and other activities well within the framework of law and under full scrutiny of the system. To make such unwarranted allegations, as the advertorial does, is purely scandalous.
Lastly, the publisher, “Business Standard”, should share liability for this irresponsible content. The publication is not only violative of journalistic ethics and guidelines of the Press Council of India but also of its own code of conduct. It is not enough to offer as an excuse that the advertorial published was not its original content.
The publisher has presented itself as a national platform to amplify and propagate such content that has potential for huge public and personal damage. The modality of publication of this content is even more dangerous if it does not offer the opportunity to refute these allegations.
At a time when the government, civil society and media houses are taking initiative to counter fake news, it will only behove “Business Standard” to take responsibility for this editorial oversight.
We demand that the following action be taken for course correction for this publication:
  • Business Standard should retract the advertorial from all its online editions with immediate effect.
  • CCFI and "Business Standard" must publish an unconditional apology for this malicious advertorial. This apology should be published on prominently front page of the print edition and on all online editions of Business Standard. 
  • Press Council of India and other regulatory bodies should take strict action as per their norms and guidelines. 
---
Click here for the list of those who have endorsed the statement

Comments

Anonymous said…
It's true some of the NGOs are overground wokers for terrorists and separatists. Mostly those with foreign funding discredit india in every sector. They always think what they see and say are 'only truth'. Make mole out of an ant hill in nmae of service to poor. Their managements are closed door mafia syndicates and nepotism is very high. Exploitation in such organisations of lower level staff is heart breaking. It's basically home based enterprise for most of them.

TRENDING

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

BSF should take full responsibility for death of 4 kids in West Bengal: Rights defender

By Kirity Roy*  One is deeply disturbed and appalled by the callous trench-digging by BSF in Chetnagachh village under Daspara Gram Panchayat, Chopra, North Dinajpur District, West Bengal that has claimed the lives of four children. Along the entire stretch of Indo-Bangladesh border of West Bengal instead of guarding the actual border delineated by the international border pillars, BSF builds fences and digs trenches well inside the Indian territory, passing through villages and encroaching on private lands, often without due clearance or consent. 

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

How GMOs would destroy non-GMO crops: Aruna Rodrigues' key submissions in SC

Counterview Desk The introduction of Bt and HT crops will harm the health of 1 billion Indians and their animals, believes Aruna Rodrigues, who has made some 60 submissions to the Supreme Court (SC) during the last 20 years. As lead petitioner who filed Public Interest Litigation in 2005, during a spate of intense hearings, which ended on 18 January 2024, she fought in the Apex Court to prevent the commercialization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Indian agriculture. 

Social justice day amidst 'official neglect' of salt pan workers in Little Rann of Kutch

By Prerana Pamkar*  In India’s struggle for Independence, the Salt Satyagraha stands as a landmark movement and a powerful symbol of nonviolent resistance. Led by Mahatma Gandhi, countless determined citizens walked from Sabarmati Ashram to Dandi in Gujarat. However, the Gujarat which witnessed the power of the common Indian during the freedom struggle is now in the throes of another significant movement: this time it is seeking to free salt pan workers from untenable working conditions in the Little Rann of Kutch (LRK).

Jallianwala massacre: Why Indian govt hasn't ever officially sought apology from UK

By Manjari Chatterjee Miller*  The king of the Netherlands, Willem-Alexander, apologized in July 2023 for his ancestors’ role in the colonial slave trade. He is not alone in expressing remorse for past wrongs. In 2021, France returned 26 works of art seized by French colonial soldiers in Africa – the largest restitution France has ever made to a former colony. In the same year, Germany officially apologized for its 1904-08 genocide of the Herero and Nama people of Namibia and agreed to fund reconstruction and development projects in Namibia. .

Corporatizing Indian agriculture 'to enhance' farmer efficiency, market competitiveness

By Shashank Shukla*  Today, amidst the ongoing farmers' protest, one of the key demands raised is for India to withdraw from the World Trade Organization (WTO). Let us delve into the feasibility of such a move and explore its historical context within India's globalization trajectory.

Interpreting UAPA bail provisions: Is Supreme Court setting the clock back?

By Kavita Srivastava*, Dr V Suresh** The Supreme Court in its ruling on 7th February, 2024 in   `Gurvinder Singh v State of Punjab’ held that its own well-developed jurisprudence that "Bail is the rule and jail the exception" will not apply to those charged under the UAPA.

A 'distorted narrative' of Indian politics: Congress failing to look beyond LS polls

By Prem Singh*  About 15 days ago, I told a senior journalist friend that there are not even two   months left for the Lok Sabha elections, Rahul Gandhi is roaming around on a delectation (tafreeh). The friend probably found my comment exasperating and replied that he is not on a delectation trip. The conversation between us on this topic ended there. 

Livelihood issues return to national agenda ahead of LS polls: SKM on Bharat Bandh

Counterview Desk  Top farmers' network, the Samyukta Kisan Morcha (SKM) has claimed big success of Grameen Bharat Bandh and industrial /sectoral strikes, stating, the “struggle reflected anger of farmers, workers and rural people across India”, adding, the move on February 16 succeeded in bringing back peoples’ livelihood issues in the national agenda just ahead of the general election to the Lok Sabha.