Skip to main content

Prashant Bhushan behaviour 'irresponsible', judges should 'avoid' politicians, tycoons

Justice Bobde after being sworn in as CJI on Nov 19, 2019
By NS Venkataraman*
In all countries, including the countries with dictatorial regimes , judiciary is considered as one of the pillars for maintaining fair dealings in the society. It is possible that in some of the countries which do not have the highest form of democracy, the judges may be influenced by the ruling coterie. However, in democratic countries, generally the judiciary is viewed as an independent, impartial and fair body.
In India, the judiciary commands a high level of confidence amongst the people in various walks of life. People think that the judiciary provides the best guarantee for rendering justice to everyone.. Any efforts to weaken the judiciary by attributing motives to the judges or painting the judges as biased will certainly weaken the judiciary and consequently the pillar of democracy.
In such circumstances, the comments of the civil rights lawyer Prashant Bhushan about the judges have caused considerable surprise, since any individual, particularly a senior lawyer, is expected to be careful in making remarks and posting comments and is expected to exercise utmost caution in the observations.
Prashant Bhushan tweeted a photograph of Chief Justice of India Sharad A Bobde astride a bike, and another on the court’s role in the past six years. Obviously, by posting such tweets, Prashant Bhushan has not behaved like a senior lawyer who should know his responsibility.
The fact is that Prashant Bhushan has been appearing in several cases in Supreme Court and some judgements have gone in his favour and some against. Praising the judge if the judgement would go in one’s favour and criticizing the judge if the judgement would go against, reflects a prejudiced mindset, lacking in wisdom.
The court was absolutely right when it said that Bhushan’s tweet gave an impression that the Chief Justice of India is enjoying his ride on a motorbike, worth Rs 50 lakh, belonging to a BJP leader, at a time when he has kept the Supreme court in lockdown mode. The court said that the tweet was a wild allegation based on distorted facts and termed it as scandalous.
Confronted with such a campaign by Prashant Bhushant , the judges had two options: One was to ignore the comment with the contempt that it deserves. The other option was to take action against the concerned person .
Prashant Bhushan seems to think that liberty to pass comments about others is unlimited in democracy. Liberty has to be conditioned by responsible behaviour
If the judges had exercised the first option of ignoring the comment, apprehension was, it would embolden every lawyer or any other person to make similar comments about the pronouncements of the judges, who have the difficult job of passing judgements on complex matters, where there can be divergent views. Such comments would inevitably create a bad impression in the minds of the people about the judges. It would weaken the image of the judiciary resulting in loss of its credibility.
Therefore, the judiciary exercised the second option and Prashant Bhushan, so that a precedent would not be created where anyone can say anything about the judiciary and get away with it.
Prashant Bhushan's controversial tweet
In India, the judiciary has several self correcting procedures, with courts operating at various levels. If one would be dissatisfied with the judgement, a higher court can be approached. Even in the highest court (Supreme Court), it is often the practice to create a bench consisting of more than one judge to hear the case and give the judgement. Obviously, this means that the judiciary only wants to be absolutely correct by giving scope for dissenting judgement and with the majority judgement prevailing.
Some lawyers in India have certain views about the socio economic and political issues. They don’t think it is necessary to be neutral. In the pre-independent days, there were lawyers who involved themselves in political activities. However, when they took political stands, they ceased to be lawyers practicing in the court.
It is not in the national interest to pass adverse views about judges in the social media or from public platforms. The judiciary system permits that, if one has a grievance about a particular judge, case can be filed against the judge too.
Prashant Bhushan is an activist and has been a member of a political party. He seems to think that the liberty to pass comments about others is unlimited in democracy. Liberty has to be conditioned by responsible behaviour and disciplined comments. He deserves punishment for making unwarranted comments about the judges and not substantiating them.
This incident is also a reminder to the judges at various levels that they have to be extremely cautious in associating themselves with various activities or participating in public or private meetings. We have seen judges participating in the meetings, sharing platform with politicians, business men and ministers, some of whom have been facing criminal charges in the courts. This is absolutely bad practice.
In the pre-Independent days, the country has seen judges who have refrained from even attending family functions and kept themselves reclusive to maintain the image of themselves as impartial and neutral persons. Such high standards are rarely seen these days.
Judges should keep in mind Mahatma Gandhi’s saying that a man of truth should also be a man of care.
---
*Trustee, Nandini Voice for the Deprived, Chennai

Comments

Anonymous said…
What a lowbrow article!
Dr A K Biswas said…
Thanks for keeping me in the loop.
Spaces for citizens have been shrinking gradually. It's a cause of anxiety.
Anonymous said…
i find this to be rather naive writing. to ignore completely the context and nature of the tweets, is only expressing ones ignorance on the issue and doesn't add an iota of intelligence to the debate or bring any fresh perspective.
It is proclaimed by Supreme Court that Bench&Bar is two sides of the same coin.Mr.Bhushan being a senior member of Bar,he has the right to indicate the shortcomings in Judiciary to uphold Independence of Judiciary.He had rightly pin pointed the shortcomings and he cannot be hauled up for criminal contempt. It is like the fence eating gross.The present article fully ignores the role of Indian Bar,its right to uphold Independence of Judiciary.

TRENDING

AMR: A gathering storm that threatens a century of progress in medicine

By Bobby Ramakant*  A strategic roundtable on “Charting a new path forward for global action against Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR)” was organised at the 77th World Health Assembly or WHA (WHA is the apex decision-making body of the World Health Organization – WHO, which is attended by all countries that are part of the WHO – a United Nations health agency). AMR is among the top-10 global health threats “Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) is a growing and urgent crisis which is already a leading cause of untimely deaths globally. More than 2 people die of AMR every single minute,” said Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director General of the WHO. “AMR threatens to unwind centuries of progress in human health, animal health, and other sectors.”

New Odia CM's tribal heritage 'sets him apart' from Hindutva Brahminical norms

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*  Mohan Charan Majhi took the oath as the new Chief Minister of Odisha following the electoral defeat of the BJD led by Naveen Patnaik, who served as Chief Minister for twenty-four years. The new Chief Minister is the son of a security guard and a four-time MLA who hails from the remote village of Raikala in the Keonjhar district. He belongs to the Santali tribe and comes from a working-class family. Such achievements and political mobilities are possible only in a democratic society. Majhi’s leadership even in the form of symbolic representation in a democracy deserves celebration.

What stops Kavach? Why no time to focus on common trains meant for common people?

By Atanu Roy  A goods train rammed into Kanchenjunga Express on 17th June morning in North Bengal. This could have been averted if the time tested anti-collision system (Kavach) was in place. 

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Top Punjab Maoist who failed to analyse caste question, promoted economism

By Harsh Thakor*  On June 15th we commemorated the 15th death anniversary of Harbhajan Singh Sohi or HBS, a well known Communist leader in Punjab. He expired of a heart attack in Bathinda in 2009.

Ram Teri Ganga Maili: How to maintain ethics in a polluted environment?

By Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD*  Is the holy Ganges getting more polluted every day? In addition to daily rituals, bathing, and religious activities performed on its banks, since ancient times, the new age industrial and population pressures are increasingly polluting the holy river. Over the decades a number of government schemes, rules and regulations to purify the Ganges have met with limited success.