Skip to main content

How Modi 'unfolded' political theatre of regression, reppression, utter confusion

By Bhargavi S Rao*
On Sunday, March 22, 2020, Prime Minister Narendra Modi called upon people of India to observe a country-wide curfew towards tackling the COVID pandemic. People were asked to step out on their ‘balconies’ that evening and bang vessels (thali bajao) in gratitude for frontline workers straining day and night to keep us all safe.
A couple of days later, at 8 pm on Tuesday 24th March, he announced a 21-day lockdown, and from that very midnight. He argued it was critically essential to win the ‘war’ with COVID-19. Lockdown is a term very unfamiliar for people. Besides, there was no clarity on what would follow. Very few were aware of its devastating consequences and were caught unawares by the sudden shut down of the entire country.
Chaos reigned as people thronged grocery stores to hoard food, medicines and other consumables, or to simply get home. For those without moneyespecially informal workers and daily wagers, the consequences were brutal. They didn’t know where they would get their next meal, how to get back home, or access critical health care.
A climate of fear was employed to shut down an entire country, warning serious jail terms for those not complying with the lockdown conditions. As days under lockdown turned into weeks, several versions of the lockdown followed each with its own distinctive sets of conditions. Confused, scared, hungry and desperate to get home, crores who lived on the margins, mainly migrant workers, decided to walk home braving harsh summer conditions.
The Government of India announced a variety of economic measures to deal with lockdown, mostly on protecting business and promoting e-commerce! There was little, very little offered, to address the crisis of the poor and the marginalized. Resource rich middle classes benefitted from this, staying home and working from home. Crores slept hungry, tired and without shelter. With inter-state and public transport services brought to a grinding halt, the entire nation was stranded.
The promise was that this will rescue from being infected by the deadly corona virus. Given that cure was far and still unknown, people complied. But soon it became evident that the strategy was not succeeding. Crores across India who slipped through these widening cracks, stripped off their dignity –children, pregnant women, senior citizens, disabled included, continued walking hundreds of kilometres to be back with their families.
If one was destined to die of Covid, they preferred to die in their homes, with their loved ones. Many migrants were thrashed by police, sprayed with chemical disinfectants, humiliated, and forced to quarantine on trees even, and that after reaching their destinations -- tired to their bones. Dozens did not make it: some were killed in brutal accidents, many others simply collapsed in exhaustion and died.
A political theatre of regression, repression, oppression and utter confusion had unfolded, leaving most clueless; the collapse of governance across India was evident. To deal with this depressing situation, civil society networks and trade unions stepped out extending relief in cities and villages to those who were without food and shelter.
The Centre took advantage of the pandemic to relegate to the background massive resistances growing nation-wide against abrogation of Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir and to the Citizen Amendment Act/ National Register of Citizens. The attacks that followed on students who were part of this resistance at Jamia Millia Islamia, Jawaharlal Nehru University and other universities, were serious matters of enquiry, which were ignored. The disastrous consequences of the carnage in Delhi, associated with elections, was off focus. Many who suffered in these horrific situations were quite simply forgotten.
The Modi administration instead had been busying itself with Namaste Trump event and the organizing the collapse of an elected government in Madhya Pradesh. With the lockdown in place, even before many reached their homes the Modi government went on to make massive policy changes by amending crucial laws of the country such as the Electricity Act, the Environment Impact Assessment Notification and Labour laws.
The amendments were mostly in favour of the industry to facilitate the ease of business and attract greater foreign investment to restart the economic engine with little care towards the emerging public health crisis. During these precious weeks, World Health Organization’s serious warnings to India to take effective steps to tackle the pandemic, also fell by the wayside.
In such an abysmal state of affairs, rather than feel despondent, civil society networks, trade unions and people’s movements came together to organize a series of webinars entitled: “Solidarity Series: Conversations during Lockdown and Beyond”. This was a coming together of multiple solidarities, and in the best way possible during lockdown. In all 17 webinars were organized between March 31 and  April 17, 2020 drawing participation of hundreds from across India and abroad. Video recordings of these critical conversations are accessible here.
These conversations drew people from multiple sectors, with diverse perspectives on a range of themes, all of which independently and collectively interrogated implications of the lockdown and critically analyzed its repercussions. Speakers in this series were a rich and rigorous mix of scholarship, activism and experience from diverse backgrounds.
Gautam Mody discusses how the capitalist system takes advantage of such a global crisis, and increases existent disparities. Leo Saldanha emphasized how during the pandemic, efforts are underway to centralise power claiming this efficient delivery of public services.
The report is a compilation of diverse perspectives on a range of themes, independent and collective analysis of the implications of the lockdown and its repercussions
Kiruba Muniswamy explains how the lockdown has been brutal on the working classes and especially frontline workers. Soumya Dutta deepens our understanding of how climate crisis and COVID 19 pandemic are similar leaving one pondering on the nature of preparedness required. T. Sundararaman argues health systems needed 10-15 years back are not available even now, and thus makes a case for a robust role for the State in financing and building up such systems without relegating the role to profit-making private sector.
Shalmali Guttal debates that governments are employing the Covid crisis to consolidate state power. And she raises serious concerns over erosion of privacy. Chandan Kumar raises concerns that a large part of the country’s work force is informal, and yet there is no comprehensive effort to address their needs and demands.
Madhu Bhushan underlines the crisis is developing into a situation where the socio-political fabric of society is being disrupted. ‘Lakshman Rekha’ employed by Prime Minister Modi, she argues, is deeply patriarchal. Meera Sanghamitra focuses on how the Trans community has become more vulnerable due to lockdown policies, such as ‘stay home stay safe’ and ‘social distancing’; which she emphasizes are oxymorons.
Manjula Pradeep highlights the critical importance of developing intersectional perspectives and narrates how multiple forms of discriminations operate, and are exacerbated by the lockdown. Avinash Kumar stresses the COVID pandemic has made the state’s obligations to protecting Human Rights even more relevant, especially given expansion of structural inequalities and discrimination. He highlights UN Charter on Human Rights and various other international standards are all the more relevant today to secure vulnerable groups and populations.
Thomas Franco analyses that while the banking sector has been in crisis for a while now, the lockdown has made it worse, and calls for real remedial action. Punit Minj discusses how disruption of access to food and livelihoods has been forced millions to leave home, and calls for a revisit of ‘Jal Jungle Jameen’ natural resourced dependent communities.
Paul Divakar addresses issues of Adivasi and Dalit exclusion in Covid relief efforts and discusses their varying impacts, highlighting how it has worsened vulnerabilities. He dreams of an India with Social justice as its foundation, followed by economic and developmental justice. Prakash Kashwan discusses how the it is critical to look beyond conventional approaches in tackling environmental emergencies and the pandemic, and calls for inter-disciplinary responses.
These vignettes weave together an inter-sectoral solidarity, and a commitment to struggle together. Each webinar was followed by rich discussions. Such enthusiasm, especially the overwhelming response, inspired us to transcribe these webinars into a readable volume accessible to a wider audience. Several student volunteers have helped transcribe these conversations, followed by editing by speakers.
---
Click here to read the 169 page transcript. Source: Centre for Financial Accountability

Comments

TRENDING

India's GDP down by 50%, not 23%, job loss 200 million not 122 million: Top economist

By Our Representative  One of India’s topmost economists has estimated that India’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) decline was around 50%, and not 23%, as claimed by the Government of India’s top data body, National Statistical Organization (NSO). Prof Arun Kumar, who is Malcolm S Adiseshiah chair professor, Institute of Social Sciences, New Delhi, said this was delivering a web policy speech, organised by the Impact and Policy Research Institute (IMPRI), New Delhi.

India performs 'poorly' in Quality of Life Index, ranks 62nd out of 64 countries

Counterview Desk “Expat Insider”, which claims to be one of the world’s most extensive surveys about living and working abroad, in a survey of 20,259 participants from around the globe, has found that of the 64 destinations around the globe, has found that while Taiwan is the best destination for persons living outside their native country, closely by Vietnam and Portugal, India ranks 59th.

Youngest of 16 activists jailed for sedition, Mahesh Raut 'fought' mining on tribal land

By Surabhi Agarwal, Sandeep Pandey* A compassionate human being, always popular among his friends and colleagues because of his friendly nature and human sensitivity, 33-year-old Mahesh Raut, champion of the democratic rights of the marginalised Adivasi people of Gadchiroli, Maharashtra, has been in prison for over two years now.

#StandWithStan: It's about Constitution, democracy and freedom of expression

By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ*  It is more than three weeks now: On the night of October 8, 2020, the 83-year-old Jesuit Fr Stan Swamy was taken into custody by the National Intelligence Agency (NIA) from his residence in Ranchi to an undisclosed destination. According to his colleagues, the NIA did not serve a warrant on Fr. Stan and that their behaviour was absolutely arrogant and rude.

Human development index: India performs worse than G-20 developing countries

By Rajiv Shah A new book, “Sustainable Development in India: A Comparison with the G-20”, authored by Dr Keshab Chandra Mandal, has regretted that though India’s GDP has doubled over the last one decade, its human development indicators are worse than not just developed countries of the Group of 20 countries but also developing countries who its members.

Stan Swamy vs Arnab Goswami: Are activists fighting a losing battle? Whither justice?

By Fr Sunil Macwan SJ* It is time one raised pertinent questions over the courts denying bail to Fr Stan Swamy, who was arrested under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), and granting it to Arnab Goswami, editor-in-chief of the Republic TV, arrested under the charge of abetting suicide of Avay Naik, who ended his life in 2018. It is travesty of justice that a human rights activist is not only denied bail but is also made to wait for weeks to hear a response to his legitimate request for a straw to drink water, while Arnab Goswami walks free.

India among heavily impacted by Covid-19, China 'notoriously' evading transparency

By NS Venkataraman* With the year 2020 inevitably ending in the next few weeks, the thought amongst the people all over the world is whether the coming year 2021 will be free of Covid-19 (often dubbed as Wuhan virus, as it known to have spread from Wuhan in China).In the early 2020, many people thought that Covid-19 would be a localized affair in China but later on, it proved to be a global pandemic.

Namaz in Mathura temple: Haridwar, Ayodhya monks seek Faisal Khan's release

By Our Representative As many as 23 members of the Hindu Voices for Peace (HVP), including the founder president of the well-known Haridwar-based Matri Sadan Ashram, Swami Shivananda Saraswati, and a one of its top monks, Brahmachari Aatmabodhanand, have expressed their “dismay” over the arrest of Khudai Khidmatdar chief Faisal Khan and three others on charges of “promoting enmity between religions” and “defiling a place of worship” after they offered namaz in Mathura’s Nand Baba temple premises on October 29.

Buddhist shrines massively destroyed by Brahmanical rulers in "pre-Islamic" era: Historian DN Jha's survey

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Government of India 'refuses' to admit: 52% of bird species show declining trend

Finn's Weaver  By Our Representative The Government of India has been pushing out “misleading” data on the country’s drastic wildlife decline, says a well-researched report, pointing towards how top ministers are hiding data on biodiversity losses, even as obfuscating its own data. It quotes “State of India’s Birds Report 2020” to note that of the 261 out of 867 bird species for which long-term trends could be determined, 52% have declined since the year 2000, with 22% declining strongly.