Skip to main content

Would India's 'toxic' TV channels start the hashtag #JusticeForRajivTyagi?

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*

The filth and garbage that is being produced in a section of TV newsrooms these days is worrying. There is nothing to suggest that this will go unchecked at least in the foreseeable future. What is happening is ironical, indeed: Those who should have been chastised and castigated by the highest courts are being defended in the name of freedom of expression. But those who are truly dedicated to freedom are being sent to jails under stringent anti-terror laws.
This is a highly disturbing phenomenon, indeed. Those shouting out on TV screens, violating all norms of decency and civilised debates, are also the ones who are getting protected and encouraged from the powers that be.
The death of Congress spokesperson Rajiv Tyagi immediately after a TV debate needs to be seen in this context. Time has come to protect democratic environment in the country. A toxic atmosphere on some of the TV channels, apparently on instructions from the saffron IT cells, is sought to be created against the opponents, who are sought to be intimidated.
Even goons wouldn’t speak the type of language that is being used on these TV channels. I heard the Republic TV anchor saying, “Udhav Thakarey mujhe jawab chahiye, tumko jawab denaa hee hogaa, tum chup nahee baith sakate.” How can any debate take place when anchors speak such a language? One wonders if time has come to boycott anchors of the TV channels which use such language.
In South India, of course, things are different. Most of the regional leaders have flourished because of the huge TV network of their respective political parties. Both DMK and AIDMK have their own channels which offer not just news but also entertainment. In North India, however, political parties need to send their representatives to TV channels to express their views. 
TV debates show how some anchors try to fill in the gaps and encourage the hateful atmosphere when the ruling party spokesperson speaks
TV debates show how some anchors try to fill in the gaps and encourage the hateful atmosphere when the ruling party spokesperson speaks. But the same anchors instigate and look at those who disagree with ruling politicians scornfully. Hatred and division are sought to be promoted. Those defending Harsh Mandar, Apoorvanand, Anand Teltumbde and Varavara Rao are sought be cowed down. What all one hears about them is, they had 'conspired' against India!
I never thought that Bihar police was so efficient, as being projected today by these TV channels, while pursuing the Sushant Singh Rajput case. Any untimely death is painful. And if there is a doubt about the death then there should be investigation. But the way the entire episode has been converted into a 'national' issue by some TV channels is just thuggish, to say the least.
One wonders, why the same channels never speak up about the institutional murder of Rohith Vemula, Dr Payal Tadvi and many other SC-ST-OBC students who have felt alienated in the face Brahmanical arrogance? Those following media trends know how pretty well how these TV channels are trying to vitiate political environment this way.
Rajiv Tyagi is no more. But will these TV channels start the hashtag #JusticeForRajivTyagi? One only needs to see the last debate in which he participated, and how he was hounded out by BJP’s Sambit Patra, who enjoyed complete 'freedom of expression', yet remained unaccountable for all that he said.
The death of Rajiv Tyagi is indeed a wakeup call for concerned activists and politicians, well also those who want to protect media freedom, to come with ways to rectify the situation.
---
*Human rights defender

Comments

TRENDING

Why do I lend my support to voices protesting world class renovation of Gandhi Ashram?

By Martin Macwan* One would not expect an activist working on Dalit rights to join such a protest. Dalits carry unhealed trauma that Gandhi caused to Dr BR Ambedkar and the Dalit cause of effective political representation by using violent means of his own definition in the event of the Poona Pact. This apart, Gandhi’s ideas in general, which changed often, on caste were orthodox. I have nothing to add to the subject after the sharpest critique offered by Dr Ambedkar.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Inaccurate gender-relevant data 'spoiling' government policy on Covid social impact

By Simi Mehta*  The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic has been different across vulnerable groups. They were hit by the pandemic at various stages, whether it was accessibility to medical treatment or financial support. The second wave witnessed human suffering at a level where one can never forget the traumatized faces of people due to the inaccessibility and unavailability of essential medical services such as hospitals beds and oxygen. The probability of the third wave has also been one of the major upcoming challenges.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Flamboyant 'demagogues' adjust politics, personality in shadow of democracy

Modi, Erdogan, Bolsonaro By Ajit Singh The terms dictators and demagogues are used interchangeably in various contexts, but there is a difference. The former rule over a totalitarian states where governments are able to exercise complete influence over every aspect of citizens’ life, whereas the latter are a "wannabe dictators" but due to the system of checks and balances they are are not fully capable to create police states.

2002 riots: Gujarat assembly 'misinformed' about dereliction of duty, says ex-DGP

By Rajiv Shah  Former Gujarat topcop RB Sreekumar, an IPS officer of the 1971 batch, has alleged that the Gujarat government gave “totally false information” on the floor of the State Assembly regarding the appeal he made to the Gujarat governor for the “initiation of departmental action against those responsible for culpable negligence in maintenance of public order and investigation of genocidal crimes” during the 2002 riots.

Celebrating birthday amidst image of 'coerced, submissive' India ruled by a strong leader

Pushkar Raj*  As the weeks long birthday festivity of the leadership was being rejoiced India wide, the Covid was still raging in several parts of India. The carnival was in line with the post-Covid decisions and actions of the leadership demonstrating a pursuit of personal power and glory instead of national interest in times of disease and death.

'Devastating impact': Rural workers suffer as Govt of India NREGA budget down by 34%

Counterview Desk  A civil rights group, the NREGA Sangharsh Morcha has sent a letter to the Prime Minister and the Minister of Rural Development and Panchayati Raj stating that 34 per cent decrease in the fiscal budget of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGA) for year 2021-22 has added to woes on India’s rural population, already suffering from “devastating impact” of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Catholic women warn: Kerala Bishop turning Church into puppet in political games

Counterview Desk A group of Catholic women under the banner Concerned Catholic Women of India has said that they are deeply concerned over "a bishop’s controversial statement" which may threaten communal harmony in India. As many as 89 Catholic women from across India have urged the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of India and its Kerala unit to take special steps to "foster peace and avoid strife."

Odisha bauxite mining project to 'devastate' life of 2,500 Adivasi, Dalit farmers: NAPM

Counterview Desk  While the public hearing on mining in Mali hills has been cancelled due to protests by Adivasi and Dalit farmers of the Mali Parbat Surakhya Samiti, Odisha, who have been protesting against the proposed bauxite mining project, India’s top civil rights network, National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM) has said it is “deeply concerned” at the decision of the Government of Odisha to push the project in a Schedule-V Adivasi-belt Koraput district against the interests of the people and environment.