Skip to main content

Would India's 'toxic' TV channels start the hashtag #JusticeForRajivTyagi?

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*

The filth and garbage that is being produced in a section of TV newsrooms these days is worrying. There is nothing to suggest that this will go unchecked at least in the foreseeable future. What is happening is ironical, indeed: Those who should have been chastised and castigated by the highest courts are being defended in the name of freedom of expression. But those who are truly dedicated to freedom are being sent to jails under stringent anti-terror laws.
This is a highly disturbing phenomenon, indeed. Those shouting out on TV screens, violating all norms of decency and civilised debates, are also the ones who are getting protected and encouraged from the powers that be.
The death of Congress spokesperson Rajiv Tyagi immediately after a TV debate needs to be seen in this context. Time has come to protect democratic environment in the country. A toxic atmosphere on some of the TV channels, apparently on instructions from the saffron IT cells, is sought to be created against the opponents, who are sought to be intimidated.
Even goons wouldn’t speak the type of language that is being used on these TV channels. I heard the Republic TV anchor saying, “Udhav Thakarey mujhe jawab chahiye, tumko jawab denaa hee hogaa, tum chup nahee baith sakate.” How can any debate take place when anchors speak such a language? One wonders if time has come to boycott anchors of the TV channels which use such language.
In South India, of course, things are different. Most of the regional leaders have flourished because of the huge TV network of their respective political parties. Both DMK and AIDMK have their own channels which offer not just news but also entertainment. In North India, however, political parties need to send their representatives to TV channels to express their views. 
TV debates show how some anchors try to fill in the gaps and encourage the hateful atmosphere when the ruling party spokesperson speaks
TV debates show how some anchors try to fill in the gaps and encourage the hateful atmosphere when the ruling party spokesperson speaks. But the same anchors instigate and look at those who disagree with ruling politicians scornfully. Hatred and division are sought to be promoted. Those defending Harsh Mandar, Apoorvanand, Anand Teltumbde and Varavara Rao are sought be cowed down. What all one hears about them is, they had 'conspired' against India!
I never thought that Bihar police was so efficient, as being projected today by these TV channels, while pursuing the Sushant Singh Rajput case. Any untimely death is painful. And if there is a doubt about the death then there should be investigation. But the way the entire episode has been converted into a 'national' issue by some TV channels is just thuggish, to say the least.
One wonders, why the same channels never speak up about the institutional murder of Rohith Vemula, Dr Payal Tadvi and many other SC-ST-OBC students who have felt alienated in the face Brahmanical arrogance? Those following media trends know how pretty well how these TV channels are trying to vitiate political environment this way.
Rajiv Tyagi is no more. But will these TV channels start the hashtag #JusticeForRajivTyagi? One only needs to see the last debate in which he participated, and how he was hounded out by BJP’s Sambit Patra, who enjoyed complete 'freedom of expression', yet remained unaccountable for all that he said.
The death of Rajiv Tyagi is indeed a wakeup call for concerned activists and politicians, well also those who want to protect media freedom, to come with ways to rectify the situation.
---
*Human rights defender

Comments

TRENDING

Buddhist shrines massively destroyed by Brahmanical rulers in "pre-Islamic" era: Historian DN Jha's survey

By Our Representative
Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book, "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

RSS' 25,000 Shishu Mandirs 'follow' factory school model of Christian missionaries

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*
The executive committee of the International Union of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences (IUAES) recently decided to drop the KISS University in Odisha as the co-host of the World Anthropology Congress-2023. The decision is driven by the argument that KISS University is a factory school.

India must recognise: 4,085 km Himalayan borders are with Tibet, not China

By Tenzin Tsundue, Sandeep Pandey*
There has as been a cancerous wound around India’s Himalayan neck ever since India's humiliating defeat during the Chinese invasion of India in 1962. The recent Galwan Valley massacre has only added salt to the wound. It has come to this because, when China invaded the neighbouring country Tibet in 1950, India was in high romance with the newly-established communist regime under Mao Zedong after a bloody revolution.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur*
Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Gujarat literati flutter: State Akademi autonomy curb a Sahitya Parishad poll issue?

By Dankesh Oza*
The 115-year-old Gujarati Sahitya Parishad is in election mode. More than 3,000 life members of the Parishad are set to elect its 52nd president and 40 plus central working committee (CWC) members, which in turn will elect its executive and two vice presidents, six secretaries and a treasurer for the coming three years (from 2021 to 2023).

Time to give Covid burial, not suspend, World Bank's 'flawed' Doing Business ranking

By Maju Varghese*
On August 27, the World Bank came out with a statement suspending the Doing Business Report. The statement said that a number of irregularities have been reported regarding changes to the data in the Doing Business 2018 and Doing Business 2020 reports, published in October 2017 and 2019. The changes in the data were inconsistent with the Doing Business methodology.

Delhi riots: Cops summoning, grilling, intimidating young to give 'false' evidence

Counterview Desk
More than 440 concerned citizens have supported the statement issued by well-known bureaucrat-turned-human rights activist Harsh Mander ‘We will not be silenced’ which said that the communal riots in Delhi in February 2020 have not been caused by any conspiracy, as alleged by the Delhi Police, but by “hate speech and provocative statements made by a number of political leaders of the ruling party.”

WHO chief ignores India, cites Pak as one of 7 top examples in fight against Covid-19

By Our Representative
In a move that would cause consternation in India’s top policy makers in the Modi government, Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, World Health Organization (WHO) director-general, has singled out Pakistan among seven countries that have set “examples” in investing in a healthier and safer future in order to fight the Covid-19 pandemic.

Agricultural reform? Small farmers will be more vulnerable, corporates to 'fix' price

By Dibyendu Chaudhuri*
Agriculture employs 42% of the total work force whereas it contributes only 16% to the country’s GDP. The average annual growth rate in agriculture has remained static to 2.9% since the last six years. This means that the post-green revolution conventional agriculture has reached its peak. Responsiveness of soil fertility to fertiliser application, an indicator of stagnancy in agriculture, shows declining trend since 1970. The worst sufferer has been the small and marginal farmers who constitute 86% of total farmers.