Skip to main content

Gujarat NGO asks Javdekar to make public all comments on draft EIA notification

By 
A Representative
Gujarat-based environmentalist Mahesh Pandya has asked Union minister for environment forest and climate change Prakash Javdekar to ensure that all the comments made on the draft Environment Impact Assessment (EIA), 2020 notification are uploaded on the Union ministry’s website for perusal of the general public.
The draft EIA was issued on March 12, days ahead of the nationwide lockdown announced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, one major contention of environmentalists why there was “little time” to consult general people, especially the affected sections, about its pros and cons.
In a letter to Javdekar, Pandya, who is director of Ahmedabad-based NGO Paryavaran Mitra, which holds observer status in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), said, in view of the fact that August 11 was the last day to submit comments/suggestions regarding draft EIA notification, the Ministry should be transparent about who all said what about it.
Pandya, who holds special consultative status with United Nations Economic and Social Council (UN ECOSOC), said, “I request you to follow transparent process regarding developments with this issue. We hope that you will surely disclose submission details in public domain.”
He added, “As your government believes in transparency and respects public participation, we are hopeful that all the procedures will be available in public domain. Your government always put people's participation at priority, so kindly follow that rule for upcoming developments for draft EIA 2020 notification.”
The senior civil society activist’s plea comes close on the heel of more than 100 environmentalists, civil society activists and citizen’s groups writing to all the 785 Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha MPs seeking the draft EIA notification’s “immediate withdrawal.”
The letter to the MPs, emailed on August 11, says, at a time like this when dealing with the pandemic and welfare of the people should be of utmost priority to the state and when people are unable to effectively engage with the process, the government instead is unleashing “draconian and destructive” policies and actions in order to “overhaul the environmental governance of the country and remove even the existing safeguards and protections.”
Citing “multiple disasters faced by the citizens of the country, either in the form of industrial disasters, accidents, building fires and collapses, floods, draught, forest fires, landslides, human-animal conflict, food and water crisis”, the letter, listing major objections, said that there is an “urgent need for strengthening our environment policy to address the crisis of climate change and put to a halt the environment destruction that is rapidly taking place.”

Comments

TRENDING

To Sonam Wangchuk: 'Will undertake 70 hour solidarity fast in Gujarat'

By Martin Macwan *  Dear Colleague Sonam Wangchuk, I have never met you personally. I wrote a short article at the time of your arrest. Your work correctly introduces you. There is truth in your words. You have embarked on a fast, following the footsteps of Gandhiji. Your intention is to make people think. Your demand is reasonable; I believe that the resignation of a single education minister will not improve the state of education in India. However, the question you have raised is extremely important for the future generation of the marginalized. Education is the key to power, development, and progress, which empowers a citizen.

US civil society coalition slams Hudson Institute for hosting RSS leaders

By A Representative   The Hudson Institute ’s “New India Conference,” held on April 23, featured senior figures from India’s ruling political ecosystem, including RSS General Secretary Dattatreya Hosabale and BJP foreign affairs head Vijay Chauthaiwale . The event also included U.S. officials and former diplomats such as Kurt Campbell, Kenneth Juster, and Nisha Biswal, alongside India’s Ambassador to the U.S., Vinay Kwatra.  

Remembering Rampur ka Tiraha: State violence and the birth of Uttarakhand’s struggle

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  In the turbulent political landscape of the early 1990s, India witnessed events that reshaped its social and regional equations. After the Babri Masjid demolition in 1992, Uttar Pradesh politics shifted dramatically, bringing the Samajwadi Party–Bahujan Samaj Party coalition to power in 1993 under Mulayam Singh Yadav. But the partnership was uneasy. Mulayam was never entirely comfortable playing the “Mandal card.” While Kanshi Ram and the BSP had consistently demanded the implementation of the Mandal Commission recommendations, Mulayam hesitated, wary of how the move might play out.