Skip to main content

External Affairs Minister 'soft-pedaling' China issue to please Beijing rulers

By NS Venkataraman*

Speaking in a meeting on August 28, 2020, India’s External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar said that “realism should shape India’s China policy”. He further said that India’s China policy will be “critical to India’s prospects” and will require “going beyond traditional assumptions.”
One really would not understand what the External Affairs Minister means by this statement, which obviously lacks clarity. When every Indian is wondering how India would tackle China’s aggressive postures, the utterances of the India’s External Affairs Minister gives an impression of his indulging in academic exercise in a debating forum.
Probably, one can understand if a professor or a retired diplomat would make such a statement, which would be read as a statement of no consequence and would simply be noted as the viewpoint of a thinker and an intellectual. Should the External Affairs Minister sound like an academic?
What is conspicuous about the speech of the External Affairs Minister is that he has not condemned China clearly for it’s aggression against India. Obviously, he wants to make a soft speech that would not hurt China. Would such an approach of the External Affairs Minister help India’s cause in dealing with aggressive China?
In the past, China has not concealed it’s intentions to belittle India at every opportunity. It claims India’s province Arunachal Pradesh as it’s own . It is holding thousands of kilometres of Indian territory that it occupied after 1962 war.
China gleefully accepted the disputed land in Kashmir from Pakistan (which increasingly appears to be a subordinate nation to China) and is constructing it’s projects in the Kashmir region that Pakistan gifted away.
Repeatedly, China blocked India’s attempts to condemn the dreaded terrorist in the United Nations. Above all, China recently entered into a war with India in the month of May, 2020, when 20 Indian soldiers were killed by Chinese army.
In such circumstances, when the External Affairs Minister has said that “realism should shape India’s China policy”, one cannot but think that it was the similar policy adopted by Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru , when he refrained from protesting when China occupied Tibet and massacred large number of Tibetan protesters.
One gets the impression that for the last several decades, China has been taking India for granted and has never considered India as an honourable neighbouring country whose sentiment should be respected.
After the recent attack by China in the month of May, there has been expectation in India that the present Indian government would do everything possible to ensure that China would give up its anti-India posture. Certainly, appeasing China or adopting soft policy towards China will not make China behave better.
Of course, India has taken some steps recently to restrict China’s investment and trade in India but this appears to be more of a cosmetic strategy , since it will not have any significant adverse impact on China’s large economy.
The Indian government has also taken measures to strengthen the military, expecting that India may have to face war at two fronts against Pakistan and China at the same time, as both these countries share common enmity and hatred towards India.
What is particularly noteworthy is the fact that India has not condemned China’s actions in Hong Kong, where it is severely suppressing the freedom movement. China is threatening Taiwan all the time and India has not expressed it’s concern about this. China’s aggression in the South China Sea is watched by India silently.
It is shocking that Prime Minister Narendra Modi has not cared to greet His Holiness the Dalai Lama on his birthday this year
China’s occupation of Tibet for several decades now has not been directly or indirectly challenged by India so far. On the other hand, India seems to be taking excessive care not to displease China, by not openly recognizing His Holiness the Dalai Lama’s role as an apostle of peace.
It is shocking that Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who is known to be very communicative, has not cared to greet His Holiness the Dalai Lama on his birthday this year.
One wonders whether India’ External Affairs Minister wants to buy peace with China at any cost. His cautious statement that “realism should shape India’s China policy” makes one suspect that he believes that peace should be bought with China by appeasement.
Until China mend it’s ways and give up it’s aggressive postures, India has to necessarily oppose China in every forum. This is the only language that China can understand.
Several countries in the world are now realizing the need to contain China and defeat it’s expansionist ambitions. As a country sharing a border with China , India is a victim of China’s aggression. Perhaps, one country which has suffered more than India due to China’s ruthless policies and conduct is Tibet.
One cannot but wonder as to why India hesitates to reverse it’s earlier counterproductive policy of approving China’s occupation of Tibet and voice it’s concern about the present plight of Tibet and stress the need for Tibet liberation. The voice of India will be heard in the world and China cannot but take note of it.
What has got India to fear about China, when China has already done the worst damage to India’s cause in several ways? There is no need for India to be afraid about China’s military strength and in the unfortunate event of such war taking place, it certainly would not be a one sided affair and the world cannot afford to see China overwhelming India in the military confrontation.
India’s China policy as indicated by India’s External Affairs Minister is causing confusion and uncertainty about India’s determination to stand up to aggressive China. The speech of the India’s External Affairs Minister reinforces this confusion.
Soft-pedaling China issue by India will only please China and none else. It is not in India’s interest. It is not in the interest of world peace also, as it is now clearly evident that China’s expansionist ambitions is a clear threat to world peace.
---
*Trustee, Nandini Voice for the Deprived, Chennai

Comments

TRENDING

Buddhist shrines massively destroyed by Brahmanical rulers in "pre-Islamic" era: Historian DN Jha's survey

By Our Representative
Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book, "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

RSS' 25,000 Shishu Mandirs 'follow' factory school model of Christian missionaries

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*
The executive committee of the International Union of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences (IUAES) recently decided to drop the KISS University in Odisha as the co-host of the World Anthropology Congress-2023. The decision is driven by the argument that KISS University is a factory school.

India must recognise: 4,085 km Himalayan borders are with Tibet, not China

By Tenzin Tsundue, Sandeep Pandey*
There has as been a cancerous wound around India’s Himalayan neck ever since India's humiliating defeat during the Chinese invasion of India in 1962. The recent Galwan Valley massacre has only added salt to the wound. It has come to this because, when China invaded the neighbouring country Tibet in 1950, India was in high romance with the newly-established communist regime under Mao Zedong after a bloody revolution.

August 22 to be observed as Apostasy Day: International coalition of ex-Muslim groups

By Our Representative
In a unique move, an international coalition of ex-Muslim organisations has decided to observe August 22, 2020 as the Apostasy Day. To be observed for “the abandonment or renunciation of religion”, the coalition, calling upon people to join the call, said, the decision to observe the Apostasy Day has been taken because of apostasy is “punishable by death in Afghanistan, Iran, Malaysia, Maldives, Mauritania, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, UAE, and Yemen.”

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur*
Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Time to give Covid burial, not suspend, World Bank's 'flawed' Doing Business ranking

By Maju Varghese*
On August 27, the World Bank came out with a statement suspending the Doing Business Report. The statement said that a number of irregularities have been reported regarding changes to the data in the Doing Business 2018 and Doing Business 2020 reports, published in October 2017 and 2019. The changes in the data were inconsistent with the Doing Business methodology.

Delhi riots: Cops summoning, grilling, intimidating young to give 'false' evidence

Counterview Desk
More than 440 concerned citizens have supported the statement issued by well-known bureaucrat-turned-human rights activist Harsh Mander ‘We will not be silenced’ which said that the communal riots in Delhi in February 2020 have not been caused by any conspiracy, as alleged by the Delhi Police, but by “hate speech and provocative statements made by a number of political leaders of the ruling party.”

WHO chief ignores India, cites Pak as one of 7 top examples in fight against Covid-19

By Our Representative
In a move that would cause consternation in India’s top policy makers in the Modi government, Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, World Health Organization (WHO) director-general, has singled out Pakistan among seven countries that have set “examples” in investing in a healthier and safer future in order to fight the Covid-19 pandemic.

Tata Mundra: NGOs worry as US court rules World Bank can't be sued for 'damages'

By Kate Fried, Mir Jalal*
On August 24 evening, a federal court ruled that the World Bank Group cannot be sued for any damage caused by its lending, despite last year’s Supreme Court ruling in the same case that these institutions can be sued for their “commercial activity” in the United States.