Skip to main content

Political use of social media, where 'likes' and 'reach' decide authenticity of an item

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*

Social media can surely act as a liberating factor for all those who haven’t been able to avail the opportunity by caste supremacists in India in the name of merit. But it is also a fact that the same brahmanical elite control social media India. A recent report, which highlights how Facebook has been politically compromised in India, explosive in its own way, however, says nothing new. It was known to many of us from the very beginning.
If Facebook is under attack for backing a particular kind of hate politics, as a frequent user of Twitter, I have found how it uses 'filers' everywhere. These filters are used very cleverly in such a way that that you elicit most likes, reaching the largest audience: All of it is decided allegedly using a particular of 'technology'.
Facebook gives you space and at the same time controls our access and reach, but I have found Twitter more notorious on this. It has allowed paid army of trolls to abuse, intimidate and resort to character assassination of those who differ with the powers-that-be. Twitter actually 'decides' what should be the 'prime time' TV discussions in the evening. Political parties and business groups use their 'troll armies' to 'trend' an issue so that it gets into 'news' channels. 
The problem in today's world is that the 'reach' and the 'likes' decide whether an item is 'authentic' or ‘worthwhile’. The fight today is not to about 'correctness' or 'authenticity' or ‘credibility’ of particular news but who is able to get away with bigger likes and shares. It is well now how it is possible to elicit more likes and shares without even reading posts.
With the advent of social media, many have got lucrative jobs meant to keep political masters happy. False narratives are sought to be built up and pushed especially through WhatsApp. Many youngsters and even veterans use these narratives as 'knowledge'. Reading habit has been on decline for quite some time now. But thanks to social media, things have gone worse. WhatsApp forwards decide whether a person is knowledgeable.
If this is true with regard to large sections of people, they are also sought be influenced by trolls, who just need is their political master’s tweet to go ahead with his or her propaganda. There is no discussion on the merit of a tweet. What is instead discussed is, how many have retweeted or endorsed or liked particular tweets. And it isn’t just trolls. TV channels and online portals use tweets for to create public opinion.
Often I have been advised to write smaller pieces or one-liners in order to get 'large' number of likes or comments. But I have wondered: Can you really express yourself in a one-liner, and will that ever raise a serious discussion? It’s fine with those playing games around these one line ‘jumlas’. But if you wish to engage in fruitful discussions, discourses, and not ‘jumlas’, are needed.
I have found meaningful and serious people become victims of social media ‘jumlas’. The aim of is not to hold constructive discussion, which one may want to trigger, but to bombard you with disinformation in order to use these platforms as an easier tool to spread political propaganda. A propagandist government wouldn’t want people to learn or gain knowledge through these platforms.
What is happening in India is not to repair the 'imperfect' democracy, but to empower the already powerful, authoritarian forces
No doubt, social media could have been a liberating force. But I realized, following the Arab Spring, that the solution that it provides is worse than the problem. A country’s fight against 'authoritarianism' is sought to be turned into anarchy and chaos. India has been a working democracy. None can say that we have been perfect, but what is happening in India is not to repair the 'imperfect' democracy, but to empower the already powerful, authoritarian forces. 
Indeed, social media has become a tool to control with political propaganda. Political dissent and diverse views are sought to be targeted and filtered. While one gets the feeling of being democratic and express voices, the fact is, it’s cleverly reduced to nothingness. 
Moreover, those abusing or threatening someone -- especially one opposing a ruling political viewpoint -- on social media are 'protected' as 'freedom of expression'. This is true not just about social media but also about the mainstream media, which have many a 'legend' that openly threaten and intimidate political opponents.
Freedom of expression is not meant for all but those who can abuse the opponent. Can you imagine any such freedom under international laws, which our 'media' claims to use to vilify the opposition and dissenting voices? In the United States, Twitter censored President Donald Trump. Social media in Europe and America is careful and wouldn’t dare allow hatred. There they can’t imagine failing to doing business with 'ease' if they target the ruling party.
Social media in our societies have important role to play and we can use them in a much better way, which can be constructive, but it would be too much to expecting from it to work for our 'welfare' while ignoring its own business interests. There is a need to build communities and alliances, share ideas and thoughts, and even when though the reach of such an exercise will be limited.
---
*Human rights defender

Comments

TRENDING

Buddhist shrines massively destroyed by Brahmanical rulers in "pre-Islamic" era: Historian DN Jha's survey

By Our Representative
Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book, "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

RSS' 25,000 Shishu Mandirs 'follow' factory school model of Christian missionaries

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*
The executive committee of the International Union of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences (IUAES) recently decided to drop the KISS University in Odisha as the co-host of the World Anthropology Congress-2023. The decision is driven by the argument that KISS University is a factory school.

India must recognise: 4,085 km Himalayan borders are with Tibet, not China

By Tenzin Tsundue, Sandeep Pandey*
There has as been a cancerous wound around India’s Himalayan neck ever since India's humiliating defeat during the Chinese invasion of India in 1962. The recent Galwan Valley massacre has only added salt to the wound. It has come to this because, when China invaded the neighbouring country Tibet in 1950, India was in high romance with the newly-established communist regime under Mao Zedong after a bloody revolution.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur*
Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Gujarat literati flutter: State Akademi autonomy curb a Sahitya Parishad poll issue?

By Dankesh Oza*
The 115-year-old Gujarati Sahitya Parishad is in election mode. More than 3,000 life members of the Parishad are set to elect its 52nd president and 40 plus central working committee (CWC) members, which in turn will elect its executive and two vice presidents, six secretaries and a treasurer for the coming three years (from 2021 to 2023).

Time to give Covid burial, not suspend, World Bank's 'flawed' Doing Business ranking

By Maju Varghese*
On August 27, the World Bank came out with a statement suspending the Doing Business Report. The statement said that a number of irregularities have been reported regarding changes to the data in the Doing Business 2018 and Doing Business 2020 reports, published in October 2017 and 2019. The changes in the data were inconsistent with the Doing Business methodology.

Delhi riots: Cops summoning, grilling, intimidating young to give 'false' evidence

Counterview Desk
More than 440 concerned citizens have supported the statement issued by well-known bureaucrat-turned-human rights activist Harsh Mander ‘We will not be silenced’ which said that the communal riots in Delhi in February 2020 have not been caused by any conspiracy, as alleged by the Delhi Police, but by “hate speech and provocative statements made by a number of political leaders of the ruling party.”

WHO chief ignores India, cites Pak as one of 7 top examples in fight against Covid-19

By Our Representative
In a move that would cause consternation in India’s top policy makers in the Modi government, Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, World Health Organization (WHO) director-general, has singled out Pakistan among seven countries that have set “examples” in investing in a healthier and safer future in order to fight the Covid-19 pandemic.

Agricultural reform? Small farmers will be more vulnerable, corporates to 'fix' price

By Dibyendu Chaudhuri*
Agriculture employs 42% of the total work force whereas it contributes only 16% to the country’s GDP. The average annual growth rate in agriculture has remained static to 2.9% since the last six years. This means that the post-green revolution conventional agriculture has reached its peak. Responsiveness of soil fertility to fertiliser application, an indicator of stagnancy in agriculture, shows declining trend since 1970. The worst sufferer has been the small and marginal farmers who constitute 86% of total farmers.