Skip to main content

BJP making RTI toothless, UPA 'failed miserably' to market the great achievement

By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ*
A massive people’s campaign is currently underway in the country to save the ‘Right to Information’ (RTI) Act. The campaign which can be visited at www.SaveRTI.in is also going viral on social media under the hashtag #SaveRTI – with several thousands of eminent and other concerned citizens already having signed it!
The initiators of this campaign make a fervent plea to all the citizens of India to write immediately to the President of India requesting him not to give his assent to the proposed amendments to the RTI Act, which have been passed by both Houses of Parliament.
The introductory letter addressed to the citizens states:
“Under the Constitution of India as an Indian Citizen YOU are sovereign and are guaranteed certain Fundamental Rights. One of these Rights is Freedom of Speech, however to be Free to Speak you need to be Free To Know. It is this right that the present Govt is trying to curtail. The Right To Information Act 2005 granted YOU powers to ask questions & demand accountability for the way YOUR taxes are being spent. It gave YOU the power to know details of the work done in YOUR localities, the decisions taken by YOUR govt.
“Unfortunately, the Right To Information Amendment 2019 just passed by YOUR MPs now threatens to take away YOUR power by making Information Commissioners dependent on THEIR whims. Taking away impartiality & independence so that everyone from the Central Information Commissioner to now dependent on THEM & therefore less answerable to YOU”.
The letter to the President of India begins with the words:
 “I am appealing to you not to sign the RTI amendment bill. I beseech you to send it back to the Parliament for reconsideration. This is a cherished right which has been codified by the RTI Act 2005. It has been rated amongst the best transparency laws in the world”.
Whether President Ram Nath Kovind pays heed to this appeal (by not giving his assent) is, at this moment, anyone’s guess! Strangely enough, as a former Member of Parliament of the Bharatiya Janata Party, President Kovind was a member of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, Law and Justice that had minutely and very comprehensively discussed each and every section of the RTI Bill in five sittings before it became an Act in 2005.
That Committee held the unanimous view that the Central Information Commission was a vital and core creation under the Act, which would be responsible for the execution of the RTI legislation. It therefore deemed it imperative to confer on the Central Information Commissioner (CIC) and the Information Commissioners the status equivalent to that of the Chief Election Commissioner and Election Commissioners, respectively. The campaign – whether it ultimately succeeds or not – is bound to have a long-term impact on the mobilisation of people’s opinions in the country.
July 25, 2019 was indeed a black day for Indian democracy when the RTI Amendment Bill, 2019 was introduced in the Rajya Sabha and passed by it. Most of the opposition wanted it to be referred to a Select Committee for further scrutiny- but this was rejected by the Government. 
In the voting that followed, the Biju Janata Dal (BJD), the Telangana Rashtra Samithi (TRS) and the Yuvajana Sramika Rythu (YSR) Congress, played truant; they sided with the Government and provided them with the ‘win’ they desperately needed. It was extremely tragic for the people of India, that opportunistic politics, lust for power and not wanting to be accountable, has in effect destroyed an important instrument which had greatly empowered the citizens of India!
Earlier, on July 19, the RTI Amendment Bill, 2019, was introduced in the Lok Sabha and it was subsequently passed. The new Bill seeks to amend the RTI Act in order to empower the Central Government to unilaterally decide the tenure, salary, allowances and other terms of service of Information Commissioners. This of course is a subtle way of telling the Information Commissioners “either you toe our line or out you go”!
Until now, those in the Information Commission were on par with the Election Commission and the Judiciary – with regard to their tenure, salaries etc. Making the members of this independent statutory body, another group of ‘babus’, will in effect undermine the autonomy of the Act. 
There will be just a few who will be willing to stand up to the brute power of the State if their careers and remuneration are at stake. Until now several of the Information Commissioners were able to deal with queries in an objective way; sought and provided information free of fear or favour and in more ways than one upheld the dignity and the rights of an empowered citizen.
Ironically, it is today the BJP and its ilk – who have left no stone unturned to make the RTI as toothless and redundant as possible. In spite of doing all they can to destroy several Constitutional and other independent statutory bodies in the past five years, some citizens have effectively used the RTI to expose their corrupt and other fraudulent acts of the current regime. So naturally, they are mortally afraid of the RTI.
In a hard-hitting Op-ed Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Manish Sisodia writes:
“An honest government would never be scared of information being made accessible. Even a corrupt UPA regime deserves credit for introducing RTI in the first place. But the Bharatiya Janata Party, a party that used RTI exposes against the Congress, and has now taken its place in the national political landscape, is ironically, terrified of it. This speaks volumes about the intent of this government. We are entering a disturbing phase, where the wheels of democracy are being forced to stop in their tracks.”
With the Right to Information (RTI) Act coming into force on October 12, 2005, participatory democracy had come of age in India! It was indeed a red-letter day for the country. The UPA government that taken over the reins of power a little over a year earlier, was making good its promise: of ensuring a more transparent and people-centred governance. The RTI was a significant step in the right direction. 
After all, democracy is a participatory process and a well-informed citizenry acts as its watchdog. Information dissemination and exchange is an inevitable part of a vibrant democracy. This helps maintain transparency at all levels. Till 2005, transparency was held hostage to red tape largely by an insensitive bureaucracy and an opaque political system!
Aruna Roy, Jairam Ramesh, Manish Sisodia 
The Right to Information (RTI) Act is in essence a codification of this important right of citizens. It is derived from our Fundamental Right to expression under Article 19. Any citizen therefore has the right to know from officialdom all opinions, advice, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contracts, reports, papers, samples, models, data material held in any electronic form and information relating to governance. 
Section 4 of the RTI Act makes it mandatory for a public authority to disseminate certain information proactively. The RTI Act 2005 has enabled citizens to effectively have access to information (including records, documents, memos, e-mails).
The UPA through its commitment to RTI gave a huge gift to the country! They failed miserably however in their ability to ‘market’ it and the two other rights namely the Right to Education (RTE) and the Right to Food (RTF) which they piloted and ushered in during their ten-year reign. Their inability to highlight their path-breaking achievements was a crucial factor for their massive defeat in the General Elections of 2014.
The BJP on the other hand seized RTI as an opportunity to expose corruption and other chinks of the UPA government. Thanks to RTI, some corruption in high places was exposed and it ultimately resulted in the undoing of the UPA and particularly the Congress party.
Aruna Roy, the leader of the National Campaign for People's Right to Information (NCPRI), who has been instrumental in the passage of the RTI Act, 2005, went hammer and tongs at the proposed amendments to the RTI and the surreptitious manner with which the Government introduced it in the Lok Sabha a few days ago. 
Roy categorically stated at a Press Conference in Jaipur:
“The bill proposing changes in the Right to Information Act (RTI) Act is regressive and aimed at undermining the independence of information commissions. It is a matter of grave concern that the amendments to the Right to Information Act (RTI) law were introduced in complete secrecy and in flagrant violation of the Pre-Legislative Consultation Policy of the Central government, which mandates public disclosure and consultation on draft legislation."
She further added, “owing to the undemocratic way of its introduction", the contents of the draft amendments were not known by MPs, citizens and the media till the bill was circulated to members of the Lok Sabha on the eve of its introduction”.
For the BJP, their allies in the NDA and for the Central government there were five significant orders passed by the Central Information Commission that would have propelled the Right to Information (Amendment) Bill 2019. Each of these orders clearly exposed the deep level of corruption that has become the DNA of the ruling party and its naked muscle to negate any challenge to their “authority”.
During the debate in the Rajya Sabha on the amendments it was Congress leader Jairam Ramesh who highlighted these five orders issued by the CIC. The five cases he mentioned to strengthen his arguments as to why these amendments were being brought in, were the CIC's order on disclosure of Prime Minister's educational qualification; the false claims made by the Prime Minister on bogus ration cards; the CIC's revelation on demonetisation that RBI disapproved it and the then RBI Raghuram Rajan giving the list of top NPA defaulters and value of black money brought back from abroad.
Jairam was emphatic in saying, “The timing of the amendment is not so innocuous and innocent. There are five cases that have propelled the government to bring these amendments”. He further alleged that the government was bringing in amendments in the Right to Information Act to take revenge on institutions as it exposes the "false claims" of the government.
Jairam also raised questions on the timing of bringing the amendments to the Bill which mandates timely response to citizen requests for government information. He said between 2003 and 2013, the then Chief Minister of Gujarat (Narendra Modi) would come to the Planning Commission and the body would ask him uncomfortable questions on the state of health and education in Gujarat. 
“In 2014 the CM of Gujarat who became PM of India had his revenge and abolished the Planning Commission. Today, Prime Minister of India is taking his revenge with for these five cases," he said.
He went on to add:
“These are the embarrassing cases for the government. The case about his educational qualification in Delhi Court. The Prime Minister has claimed four crore bogus ration cards were weeded out by his government whereas the RTI shows that the number of bogus rations cards was actually 2.3 crore. The CIC directed the Prime Minister office about the quantum of black money brought back from abroad. The PMO refused to share the details despite CIC order."
The former union minister said that the real reason for the amendments in the Bill was to make the CIC "toothless" and to convert the information body to "Prime Minister office directed body”. He also accused the government of giving misleading statements regarding its claim of strengthening the RTI Act and the CIC.
Further, Sisodia highlights what the RTI has done for democracy since it was made law in 2005 when he says poignantly:
“The wheels were turning in the direction of a deepening of democracy. The measure of progress of any democracy is the level of empowerment of ordinary citizens. When the state seeks to take away power from ordinary citizens, it is at the cost of democracy itself. The RTI movement was born out of the view that people are the masters and the government exist to serve them. For the five-year period after elections concluded, there was no mechanism to hold governments accountable. The RTI plugged this loophole. The RTI has now become the backbone of our democracy”.
Concerned citizens from all over the country and from all walks of life have been expressing their displeasure of how every facet of Indian democracy is not only being hijacked but being totally destroyed, by the BJP their allies and their ilk. 
Well-known RTI activist Anjali Bhardwaj tweeted, “Sad day for democracy. The ONE law which empowers people to hold the government to account stands diluted. RTI amendment Bill passed by Parliament. We will now petition the President to return the Bill”, and in a further tweet she writes, “Struggle to #SaveRTI not over. Use petition in link to email President of India demanding that he not sign #RTIAmendment Bill”.
It is a passionate appeal that no one who is concerned about the future of the country, should dare ignore. The ruling regime, which is just not concerned about the rights and freedom of the ordinary citizen, has just tolled another death-knell for democracy in India. We, the people of India, must wake up at least now, take a stand to #Save RTI and petition the President, before it is too late.
---
*Human rights and peace activist/writer. Contact: cedricprakash@gmail.com

Comments

TRENDING

Women innovators on simple, revolutionary alternate solutions for water problems

By Proshakha Maitra, Mansee Bal Bhargava* The detrimental effects of uncontrolled population rise and accelerated change in the global climate have posed tremendous pressure on the water and sanitation. This calls all stakeholders, from both developed and developing nations, to improve their resilience and to instigate sustainability. It is more crucial than ever to optimise the use of the resources we have on hand since the world population is projected to reach 9.7 billion by 2050.

IMA vs Ramdev: Why what's good or bad for goose should be good or bad for gander

By Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD* Baba Ramdev and his associate Balkrishna faced the wrath of the Supreme Court for their propaganda about their Ayurvedic products and belittling mainstream medicine. Baba Ramdev had to apologize in court. His apology was not accepted and he may face the contempt of court with harsher punishment. The Supreme Court acted on a public interest litigation (PIL) moved by the Indian Medical Association (IMA).

Alleged killing of another Bangladesh youth inside Indian territory: NHRC inquiry sought

By Kirity Roy* There was yet another incident of the killing of a Bangladeshi youth by the Border Security Force personnel attached with ‘Barthar’ BOP of ‘G’ Company of 75 BSF Battalion. In last five years several incidents of killings happened under this police station’s jurisdiction and the cases will get the award as “Not Guilty” as usual.

Magnetic, stunning, Protima Bedi 'exposed' malice of sexual repression in society

By Harsh Thakor*  Protima Bedi was born to a baniya businessman and a Bengali mother as Protima Gupta in Delhi in 1949. Her father was a small-time trader, who was thrown out of his family for marrying a dark Bengali women. The theme of her early life was to rebel against traditional bondage. It was extraordinary how Protima underwent a metamorphosis from a conventional convent-educated girl into a freak. On October 12th was her 75th birthday; earlier this year, on August 18th it was her 25th death anniversary.

Modi model, Hindutva icon 'justified' alliance with Muslim League before Independence

By Shamsul Islam*  Our PM describes himself as ‘Hindu’ nationalist and member of RSS. He proudly shares the fact that he was groomed to be a political leader by one of the two fathers of the Hindutva politics, MS Golwalkar (the other being VD Savarkar) and given the task of establishing Hindutva polity in India after eradicating secularism.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Crusader for people’s causes, this Hollywood actor entered 'unexplored zones' in US

By Harsh Thakor*  Marlon Brando on April 3rd completes his birth centenary. He perished in 2004, on July 1, aged 80 years. Arguably in Hollywood Brando penetrated sensitivity and versatility at an unparalleled scale and discovered new horizons or explored path breaking zones in acting.

Nuclear power expansion: Is AEC's new, 'unrealistic' target fully backed by PMO?

By Shankar Sharma*  Another unrealistic and tall claim by Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) has been announced: India is eyeing 100 GW nuclear power by 2047, the AEC chairman  AK Mohanty   has said. A few years ago, the dream target for the Indian nuclear establishment was 275,000 MWe of nuclear power by 2050 (as per DAE document of 2008 "A Strategy for the Growth of Electricity in India”). Now this target of 100 GW nuclear power by 2047. And as at the end of February 2024, the actual nuclear power capacity was only 7,480 MWe, which formed only 1.7% of the total power capacity in the country. 

Indians witnessing 'regression to Hindutva politics' under Modi ahead of elections

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*  The forthcoming general election in India, scheduled from April 19, 2024, to June 1, 2024, to elect the 543 members of the 18th Lok Sabha and the new Government of India, carries immense significance for the preservation of India's identity as a liberal, secular, and constitutional democracy.

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.