Skip to main content

Gujarat's Right to Educational rules not disability friendly: UNESCO

By A Representative
A UNESCO-sponsored report has sharply criticized Gujarat for failing to be disability-friendly towards children aged 5-19. The report says that all state rules for implementing the Right to Education Act, 2006, for instance, "provide for safe transportation to and from school for children with disabilities" with the exception of Gujarat and Uttarakhand.
Prepared by the Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai, "N for Nose: State of the Education Report for India 2019: Children with Disabilities", while commenting on other state RTE rules, the report continues, "Karnataka and Kerala are the only two states whose RTE rules provide for assistive devices and reasonable accommodation."
It says, "While most state rules entrust School Management Committees (SMCs) with the identification and enrolment of children with disabilities, and their participation in and completion of elementary education, they do not necessarily specify representation of their parents or guardians or that of the children themselves wherever student participation is provided for."
It adds, "Except Kerala, none of the state rules refer to special schools for children with disabilities in their RTE rules." Worse, it says, a study of gender gaps of children with disabilities across states reveals that Gujarat is one of the top states having "gender gaps at both secondary and higher secondary levels." Other States are Karnataka, Kerala and Maharashtra.
The report says, figures for enrolment at secondary and higher secondary levels by gender shows that in Gujarat's Grades IX-X 6,357 are boys and 3,913 girls, and in Grades XI-XII 2,233 are boys and 1,609 girls. Quoting an audit report, it adds, in Gujarat, braille books "were not provided to 9,189 children between 2010 and 2016." Reason? "Approved cost of Braille books was very low in comparison to actual cost, and there was no participation in online tender for Braille books."

Comments

TRENDING

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”

If Maoist violence is illegitimate, how is Hindutva, state violence justified? Can right-wing wash off its sins?

By Swami Agnivesh* and Sandeep Pandey** There was major police action against Sudha Bhardwaj, Gautam Navlakha, Varvara Rao, Vernon Gonsalves and Arun Ferreira on 28 August, 2018. Before this police arrested Professor Shoma Sen, Adocate Sudhir Gadling, Sudhir Dhawle, Mahesh Raut and Rona Wilson on 6 June. Even before this Dr. Binayak Sen, Soni Sori, Ajay TG, Professor GN Saibaba and Prashant Rahi have been arrested and all these activists have been accused of having links with Maoists.

Planning failures? Mysuru’s traditional water networks decline as city expands

By Prajna Kumaraswamy, Mansee Bal Bhargava   The tropical land–water-scape of India shapes every settlement through lakes, ponds, wetlands, and rivers. Mysuru (Mysore) is a city profoundly shaped by both natural and humanly constructed water systems. For generations, it has carried a collective identity tied to the seasonal rhythms of the monsoon, the life-giving presence of the Cauvery and Kabini rivers , and the intricate network of lakes and ponds that dot the cityscape. Water transcends being merely a resource; it is part of collective memory, embedded in place names, agricultural heritage, and the very land beneath our feet. In an era of rapid urbanization and climate-induced land–water transformations, understanding this profound relationship with the land–water-scape is strategic for sustainability, resilience, and even survival.