Skip to main content

Private pressure: Health ministry says, patients must 'obligatorily' pay hospital fees

Counterview Desk
The civil rights network Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA) has demanded from the Union health ministry that it should ensure there is “no dilution” in patients’ rights, insisting, the ministry should adopt the charter on patients’ rights based on the recommendation to the ministry by the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) last year.
The demand comes close on the heels of Preeti Sudan, secretary, Union health ministry, sending a fresh instruction to all state chief secretaries, which JSA says is a diluted version of the NHRC charter. In a letter to Sudan, JSA has said, “Only around half of the original patients’ rights are contained in this letter”, and “ten important rights have been dropped, apparently due to resistance from the private medical lobby.”
Sent on July 26, the letter to Sudan says, earlier, in September 2018, the Union Health Ministry displayed a charter of patients’ rights containing 17 rights on its website, based on NHRC recommendations.
JSA says, “Since no progress was made for several months regarding this charter, on February 26, Jan Swasthya Abhiyan, Mahila Pragati Manch, People for Better Treatment, Delhi Network of Positive People, All India Patients’ Rights Group collectively organised a major protest at Jantar Mantar, New Delhi, and subsequently had discussion with concerned officials at Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW), asking for speedy implementation of the NHRC-based charter.”

Text of the letter:

We the undersigned are health professionals, health activists and social workers from across various states of India, who are associated with Jan Swasthya Abhiyan and various other networks working on health rights and patients’ rights.
We are writing with reference to the letter issued by your office to Chief Secretaries of all states regarding adoption of the Charter of Patients’ rights, dated 2 June 2019. We have compared the list of patients’ rights outlined in your letter, with the Charter of Patients’ Rights which had been originally proposed by NHRC and was displayed on Health Ministry’s website from September 2018 onwards. This issue was discussed in a national workshop on patients’ rights (July 23, 2019) and Jan Swasthya Abhiyan national coordination committee (July 24, 2019) held at Delhi.
Based on this analysis and deliberations, while we welcome the initiative by MoHFW in circulating a letter on Patients’ rights to states, we are also deeply concerned to note that although the NHRC charter contained a comprehensive set of 17 patients’ rights, your letter has significantly diluted and reduced this list, effectively dropping 10 important patients’ rights which were contained in the NHRC charter, these rights deleted by MoHFW are as follows:
  • Right to emergency medical care
  • Right to care according to prescribed rates wherever relevant 
  • Right to safety and quality care according to standards 
  • Right to choose source for obtaining medicines or tests 
  • Right to proper referral and transfer, which is free from perverse commercial influences 
  • Right to protection for patients involved in clinical trials 
  • Right to protection of participants involved in biomedical and health research 
  • Right to take discharge of patient and not be detained in hospital 
  • Right to patient education 
  • Right to be heard and seek redressal 
Each of these rights is not only non-negotiable and absolutely essential for the protection of patients, they are also backed by various legal provisions, judgements and official documents. Given this context, it is surprising that almost half of the rights contained in the original charter displayed on your Ministry’s website have been summarily dropped by your Ministry without any explanation.
Further there is addition of certain patient responsibilities, such as obligation to pay hospital agreed fees on time, which have been added in your letter, which we find problematic due to potential for misuse of this provision by private hospitals.

Given this situation we strongly propose the following:

MoHFW, Govt of India should issue a modified letter to Chief Secretaries of all states, which must include mention of all 17 patients’ rights which were outlined in the NHRC patients’ rights charter without dilution; this should be done as soon as possible.
Recently, a set of draft minimum standards for clinical establishments has been released for comments by MoHFW. We regard this as a positive though extremely delayed step. However, we note that these standards mention a charter for patients’ rights (containing nine rights) as annexures, this charter is an even further truncated version of the 12 patients’ rights mentioned in your own letter dated June 2, 2019.
This situation should be rectified, and besides mentioning all 12 rights of your letter,the entire set of rights contained in NHRC charter (mentioned above) should be included in the patients’ rights charter which would be part of the Central minimum standards for clinical establishments.
Union health ministry has sent fresh instruction to all state chief secretaries, which is a diluted version of the NHRC patients' rights charter
We are aware of the private medical lobby which tends to oppose or demand dilution of such regulations in public interest; your letter dated June 2, 2019 has appropriately mentioned about this lobby.
Further, in case any of the patients’ rights mentioned in the NHRC charter is being contested by certain sections of the private medical sector, then the Health Ministry should overrule such vested commercial interests, holding the interests of the general public as paramount. Nevertheless, if considered necessary MoHFW may organize a multi-stakeholder consultation at the earliest to discuss any such contentious issues so that an appropriate resolution may be found.
JSA and patients’ rights groups would be happy to participate and contribute to such a consultative process in the interests of patients and ordinary people, who are today suffering a wide range of rights violations in commercialized private hospitals, and look upon the Union Health Ministry as their ally and protector of public health in the country.
---
Click HERE for the list of signatories

Comments

TRENDING

India performs 'poorly' in Quality of Life Index, ranks 62nd out of 64 countries

Counterview Desk “Expat Insider”, which claims to be one of the world’s most extensive surveys about living and working abroad, in a survey of 20,259 participants from around the globe, has found that of the 64 destinations around the globe, has found that while Taiwan is the best destination for persons living outside their native country, closely by Vietnam and Portugal, India ranks 59th.

India's GDP down by 50%, not 23%, job loss 200 million not 122 million: Top economist

By Our Representative  One of India’s topmost economists has estimated that India’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) decline was around 50%, and not 23%, as claimed by the Government of India’s top data body, National Statistical Organization (NSO). Prof Arun Kumar, who is Malcolm S Adiseshiah chair professor, Institute of Social Sciences, New Delhi, said this was delivering a web policy speech, organised by the Impact and Policy Research Institute (IMPRI), New Delhi.

Youngest of 16 activists jailed for sedition, Mahesh Raut 'fought' mining on tribal land

By Surabhi Agarwal, Sandeep Pandey* A compassionate human being, always popular among his friends and colleagues because of his friendly nature and human sensitivity, 33-year-old Mahesh Raut, champion of the democratic rights of the marginalised Adivasi people of Gadchiroli, Maharashtra, has been in prison for over two years now.

Human development index: India performs worse than G-20 developing countries

By Rajiv Shah A new book, “Sustainable Development in India: A Comparison with the G-20”, authored by Dr Keshab Chandra Mandal, has regretted that though India’s GDP has doubled over the last one decade, its human development indicators are worse than not just developed countries of the Group of 20 countries but also developing countries who its members.

#StandWithStan: It's about Constitution, democracy and freedom of expression

By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ*  It is more than three weeks now: On the night of October 8, 2020, the 83-year-old Jesuit Fr Stan Swamy was taken into custody by the National Intelligence Agency (NIA) from his residence in Ranchi to an undisclosed destination. According to his colleagues, the NIA did not serve a warrant on Fr. Stan and that their behaviour was absolutely arrogant and rude.

Stan Swamy vs Arnab Goswami: Are activists fighting a losing battle? Whither justice?

By Fr Sunil Macwan SJ* It is time one raised pertinent questions over the courts denying bail to Fr Stan Swamy, who was arrested under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), and granting it to Arnab Goswami, editor-in-chief of the Republic TV, arrested under the charge of abetting suicide of Avay Naik, who ended his life in 2018. It is travesty of justice that a human rights activist is not only denied bail but is also made to wait for weeks to hear a response to his legitimate request for a straw to drink water, while Arnab Goswami walks free.

India among heavily impacted by Covid-19, China 'notoriously' evading transparency

By NS Venkataraman* With the year 2020 inevitably ending in the next few weeks, the thought amongst the people all over the world is whether the coming year 2021 will be free of Covid-19 (often dubbed as Wuhan virus, as it known to have spread from Wuhan in China).In the early 2020, many people thought that Covid-19 would be a localized affair in China but later on, it proved to be a global pandemic.

Namaz in Mathura temple: Haridwar, Ayodhya monks seek Faisal Khan's release

By Our Representative As many as 23 members of the Hindu Voices for Peace (HVP), including the founder president of the well-known Haridwar-based Matri Sadan Ashram, Swami Shivananda Saraswati, and a one of its top monks, Brahmachari Aatmabodhanand, have expressed their “dismay” over the arrest of Khudai Khidmatdar chief Faisal Khan and three others on charges of “promoting enmity between religions” and “defiling a place of worship” after they offered namaz in Mathura’s Nand Baba temple premises on October 29.

Buddhist shrines massively destroyed by Brahmanical rulers in "pre-Islamic" era: Historian DN Jha's survey

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Government of India 'refuses' to admit: 52% of bird species show declining trend

Finn's Weaver  By Our Representative The Government of India has been pushing out “misleading” data on the country’s drastic wildlife decline, says a well-researched report, pointing towards how top ministers are hiding data on biodiversity losses, even as obfuscating its own data. It quotes “State of India’s Birds Report 2020” to note that of the 261 out of 867 bird species for which long-term trends could be determined, 52% have declined since the year 2000, with 22% declining strongly.