Skip to main content

Private pressure: Health ministry says, patients must 'obligatorily' pay hospital fees

Counterview Desk
The civil rights network Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA) has demanded from the Union health ministry that it should ensure there is “no dilution” in patients’ rights, insisting, the ministry should adopt the charter on patients’ rights based on the recommendation to the ministry by the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) last year.
The demand comes close on the heels of Preeti Sudan, secretary, Union health ministry, sending a fresh instruction to all state chief secretaries, which JSA says is a diluted version of the NHRC charter. In a letter to Sudan, JSA has said, “Only around half of the original patients’ rights are contained in this letter”, and “ten important rights have been dropped, apparently due to resistance from the private medical lobby.”
Sent on July 26, the letter to Sudan says, earlier, in September 2018, the Union Health Ministry displayed a charter of patients’ rights containing 17 rights on its website, based on NHRC recommendations.
JSA says, “Since no progress was made for several months regarding this charter, on February 26, Jan Swasthya Abhiyan, Mahila Pragati Manch, People for Better Treatment, Delhi Network of Positive People, All India Patients’ Rights Group collectively organised a major protest at Jantar Mantar, New Delhi, and subsequently had discussion with concerned officials at Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW), asking for speedy implementation of the NHRC-based charter.”

Text of the letter:

We the undersigned are health professionals, health activists and social workers from across various states of India, who are associated with Jan Swasthya Abhiyan and various other networks working on health rights and patients’ rights.
We are writing with reference to the letter issued by your office to Chief Secretaries of all states regarding adoption of the Charter of Patients’ rights, dated 2 June 2019. We have compared the list of patients’ rights outlined in your letter, with the Charter of Patients’ Rights which had been originally proposed by NHRC and was displayed on Health Ministry’s website from September 2018 onwards. This issue was discussed in a national workshop on patients’ rights (July 23, 2019) and Jan Swasthya Abhiyan national coordination committee (July 24, 2019) held at Delhi.
Based on this analysis and deliberations, while we welcome the initiative by MoHFW in circulating a letter on Patients’ rights to states, we are also deeply concerned to note that although the NHRC charter contained a comprehensive set of 17 patients’ rights, your letter has significantly diluted and reduced this list, effectively dropping 10 important patients’ rights which were contained in the NHRC charter, these rights deleted by MoHFW are as follows:
  • Right to emergency medical care
  • Right to care according to prescribed rates wherever relevant 
  • Right to safety and quality care according to standards 
  • Right to choose source for obtaining medicines or tests 
  • Right to proper referral and transfer, which is free from perverse commercial influences 
  • Right to protection for patients involved in clinical trials 
  • Right to protection of participants involved in biomedical and health research 
  • Right to take discharge of patient and not be detained in hospital 
  • Right to patient education 
  • Right to be heard and seek redressal 
Each of these rights is not only non-negotiable and absolutely essential for the protection of patients, they are also backed by various legal provisions, judgements and official documents. Given this context, it is surprising that almost half of the rights contained in the original charter displayed on your Ministry’s website have been summarily dropped by your Ministry without any explanation.
Further there is addition of certain patient responsibilities, such as obligation to pay hospital agreed fees on time, which have been added in your letter, which we find problematic due to potential for misuse of this provision by private hospitals.

Given this situation we strongly propose the following:

MoHFW, Govt of India should issue a modified letter to Chief Secretaries of all states, which must include mention of all 17 patients’ rights which were outlined in the NHRC patients’ rights charter without dilution; this should be done as soon as possible.
Recently, a set of draft minimum standards for clinical establishments has been released for comments by MoHFW. We regard this as a positive though extremely delayed step. However, we note that these standards mention a charter for patients’ rights (containing nine rights) as annexures, this charter is an even further truncated version of the 12 patients’ rights mentioned in your own letter dated June 2, 2019.
This situation should be rectified, and besides mentioning all 12 rights of your letter,the entire set of rights contained in NHRC charter (mentioned above) should be included in the patients’ rights charter which would be part of the Central minimum standards for clinical establishments.
Union health ministry has sent fresh instruction to all state chief secretaries, which is a diluted version of the NHRC patients' rights charter
We are aware of the private medical lobby which tends to oppose or demand dilution of such regulations in public interest; your letter dated June 2, 2019 has appropriately mentioned about this lobby.
Further, in case any of the patients’ rights mentioned in the NHRC charter is being contested by certain sections of the private medical sector, then the Health Ministry should overrule such vested commercial interests, holding the interests of the general public as paramount. Nevertheless, if considered necessary MoHFW may organize a multi-stakeholder consultation at the earliest to discuss any such contentious issues so that an appropriate resolution may be found.
JSA and patients’ rights groups would be happy to participate and contribute to such a consultative process in the interests of patients and ordinary people, who are today suffering a wide range of rights violations in commercialized private hospitals, and look upon the Union Health Ministry as their ally and protector of public health in the country.
---
Click HERE for the list of signatories

Comments

TRENDING

Impact of state repression? Kashmir's 65% people prefer independence: Cambridge study

By Rajiv Shah 
Even as the Government of India’s controversial move to abrogate Article 370 of the Constitution and bifurcate Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) into two union territories is not only refusing to down die but has acquired international dimensions, a recent study, published by the Cambridge University Press, has claimed “pro-independence attitudes” among that 65% of Kashmiris, warning, this sentiment worsens when the state machinery resorts “repressive violence”.

Dholera 'inundated': Gujarat govt tries selling low lying area as top smart city site

Counterview Desk
Even as the Dholera Special Investment Region Regional Development Authority (DSIRDA) of the Gujarat government was busy organising a junket for Gujarat-based journalists for the area sought to be sold as an ideal special investment region (SIR) for industrialists, well-known farmers' activist Sagar Rabari has wondered why no investor has so far agreed to put in money in an area situated in Ahmedabad district along the Gulf of Khambhat.

Congress' anti-democratic laws led to Modi govt's 'Constitutional' changes: Scholars

Counterview Desk
A large number of academics* said to be belonging to several Indian and international institutions, even as taking strong exception to the Narendra Modi government's alleged move to amend the Constitution through "illegitimate" means, have taken strong exception to their colleagues in academia who we have become "all too accustomed to adopting a calculated silence in the face of such indignities."

Hindus to be 'sent' to Kashmir? Despite Israeli settlements, peace eludes the region

By Anand K Sahay*
Curfew, news and communications blackout, transportation shut-down... News reports from Kashmir are worrying. So are the views relayed through the media, especially television. Old-fashioned repression seems to be consorting comfortably with expressions of concern “for our Kashmiri brethren”. We are looking at Orwell’s 1984 in the making.

Kashmir normal? Schoolboys, teenagers being arbitrarily picked up, detained: Report

Counterview Desk
A four-person team, consisting of Jean Dr├Ęze, well-known development economist; Kavita Krishnan, who is with the Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist); Maimoona Mollah of the All India Democratic Women's Association (AIDWA); and Vimal Bhai of the National Alliance of People's Movements (NAPM), back from a five-day fact-finding mission (August 9-13) from Kashmir, has said that people they spoke to “expressed their pain, anger, and sense of betrayal against the Government of India.”
In a report, “Kashmir Caged”, released along with a short eight-minute film, they said, the abrogation of Articles 370 and 35A, dissolution of the state of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K), and bifurcating it into two Union Territories, is not being supported by anyone they met, except for BJP spokesperson on Kashmir affairs Ashwani Kumar Chrungoo, who claimed 46% vote share in J&K.
Excerpts from the report: When our flight landed, and the airlines staff announced that passeng…

Modi's Gujarati mind? Why govt move to 'sell-off' defence PSUs isn't in national interest

By Sandeep Pandey*
The Standing Committee on Defence, 2017-18, of the 16th Lok Sabha highlights the idea of Buy Indian-IDDM (Indigenously Designed Developed and Manufactured). The Committee expressed concern over the import content of equipments produced and developed by Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), Ordnance Factories (OFs) and defence Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) because of the dependence it creates for military hardware on foreign suppliers.

Central Gujarat effluent channel 'releasing' highly polluted industrial wastewater: PM told

Counterview Desk
Senior environmentalists of the Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti (PSS), Vadodara, Rohit Prajapati and Krishnakant, in an open letter to the Prime Minister, the Gujarat chief minister, the Gujarat chief secretary, and senior Government of India and Gujarat government officials dealing with environment, pollution and climate change have said that the authorities’ response their pleas to take action against the leakages and flow of polluted wastewater from the effluent channels of Central Gujarat industrial areas has met with complete inertia.

Can't go to court with RTI information, rule Ahmedabad authorities: Kankaria accident

By Pankti Jog*
In a shocking reply to an application filed by me, the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC) authorities have said that the information provided under the Right to Information (RT) Act should be used in court or in a judicial process. The Act is known to be a major tool that enables citizens to seek certified copies of documents, records from any public authority of state and Central government within 30 days, as per provisions of the Act.

Quit India Movement 'betrayal' and dubious role of Hindu Mahasabha, RSS leaders

By Shamsul Islam*
After the recent guillotine of Article 370, Hindutva ideologue Ram Madhav, while celebrating the occasion stated that it was honouring of the sacrifices of Dr Shyam Prasad Mukherjee and thousands others who laid down their lives for its removal. It is to be noted that Dr Mukherjee was a cadre of RSS and was groomed into a Hindutva leader by another Hindutva icon, VD Savarkar.

Strategy for united struggle against Hindutva 'fascism': Ideological silence is 'no option'

By Dr Bhabani Shankar Nayak*
Electoral alliance and opportunism of national and regional political parties, neoliberal economic marginalisation and soft secular Hindutva line pandering to Hindu majoritarianism laid the foundation of Hindutva fascism in post-colonial India.