Cess for Gujarat construction workers: Spending less than 10%; no 'direct help' to beneficiaries

By A Representative
While the Gujarat government’s Building and Other Construction Workers Welfare Board, set up in 2004, as of March 31, 2019, has collected a total cess of Rs 2,097.62 crore from the the builders, it has spent less than 10% -- Rs 197.17 crore. And, as on May 31, 2019, the total cess collection has reached Rs 2,583.16 crore, said a statement issued by Bandhkam Majur Sagathan general secretary Vipul Pandya.
Pointing out that just about 6.5 lakh out of 20 lakh workers have been registered under the board, Pandya said, vis-à-vis other states, Gujarat ranks No 13th in the amount spent on the welfare of the construction workers, while 11th in the amount collected.
And while the builders are obliged to pay just about 1% of the total cost of their project, the calculation of the cess is flawed: It is Rs 3,000 per square yard; accordingly, Rs 30 per square yard is collected. “Had the cess been collected on the real construction cost, it would have been at least Rs 7,000 crore”, Pandya added.
Pandya complained, most of the amount spent on the cess has gone to areas not directly related with construction workers’ welfare. Thus, Rs 39.75 crore has been spent on the Shramik Annapurna Yojna, seeking to provide cheap cooked food to construction workers.
This is followed by Rs 27.48 crore is spent construction workers’ education, Rs 9.80 crore on their coaching classes, Rs 6.41 crore on Dhanvantari Rath provididing mobile health facilities at construction facilities, and Rs 5.43 crore on temporary shelter.
As against this, the board has spent just about Rs 2.10 crore on pregnant women during child birth, Rs 66 lakh as emergency help, Rs 39.53 lakh for the Nanaji Deshmukh housing, and so on. \
“There appears to be huge corruption in the disbursement of funds”, Pandya alleged. “Spending on education and coaching is all diverted to private agencies. Again, while private parties have been paid Rs 9.80 crore on educating workers about safety norms, they are not being paid the stipend, as required”, he said.
“Similarly, while the government is spending huge sums on providing cheap food under the Annapurna Yojna, most workers do not benefit from it”, he added.

Tibetan activist’s self-immolation sparks fresh concerns over cultural rights

By Kumar Krishnan* The question of Tibet has once again entered international discourse, raising difficult questions about human rights, religious freedom, cultural identity, language, and the relationship between political power and the rights of indigenous communities. On 20 August 2026, the Kashag and the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile jointly organised a solidarity prayer service and peace march to mark the 49th day since the death of Lobga Rangzen, a Tibetan activist who died after self-immolating on 2 July in front of the United Nations Headquarters in New York.

IMF's policies 'stabilise' external creditors' balance sheets, 'generate' crisis in Africa

By Grieve Chelwa, Vijay Prashad Across Africa, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) presents itself as the custodian of macroeconomic stability. Its latest Article IV staff reports on Ethiopia . Malawi , Nigeria , South Africa , and Zambia are written for economies with very different histories and institutions. Yet they converge on a familiar prescription: fiscal consolidation, tighter monetary policy, market-determined exchange rates, subsidy reform, deregulation and ‘private-sector-led growth’. No serious economist can dismiss macroeconomic stability.

The “Dr” debate masks a larger crisis in allied-health education

By Dr P K Gupta* India’s allied-health professions have long operated in a fragmented landscape of universities, hospitals, State authorities and private institutions, each with its own nomenclature, curriculum and standards. The National Commission for Allied and Healthcare Professions Act, 2021 was meant to correct this by creating a unified national framework for education, professional regulation and institutional recognition. Few dispute the need for such oversight. The real question is whether standardisation is quietly becoming synonymous with longer courses, additional internships and new professional titles—changes that risk masking deeper gaps in clinical training, institutional capacity and affordability.

Counterview

Search This Blog