Skip to main content

Gender budgeting? Govt of India allocates just 2.1%, 0.73% for SC, ST women

By Rajiv Shah
The National Campaign on Dalit Human Rights (NCDHR), one of the most influential all-India Dalit rights networks, has taken strong exception to the manner in which the Government of India has undermined Gender Responsive Budgeting in the Union Budget 2019-20 for scheduled castes (SCs) and scheduled tribes (STs), pointing towards “wide gaps” between the goals and the situational reality of “the Dalit and Adivasi women on the ground.”
NCDHR, in its report titled "Dalit Adivasi Budget Analysis 2019-20", says that its analysis of the Gender Budget Statement (GBS) reveals that the allocation under GBS is Rs 1,36,934 crore, out of which appallingly for the SC and ST women only Rs 2,890 crore (2.1%) and Rs 1,006.74 crore (0.73%), respectively.
According to the report, “This is a clear paradox where on one side there is a huge discussion on inclusive development, while on the other there is very limited allocation addressing the needs of the SC and ST women.”
The report regrets, “Despite growing incidences of violence against SC and ST women there is an insignificant allocation of Rs 42 crore pertaining to their access to justice and adequate compensation”, adding, “There is only one scheme pertaining to the same, namely, Strengthening of Machinery for Enforcement of Protection of Civil Rights Act (PCR), 1955 and Prevention of Atrocities (PoA) Act,1989’ which is mainly towards sensitisation programmes.”
NCDHR comments, “There have been massive cases of violence against the Dalit and Adivasi women across the country demonstrating the systematic manner in which Dalit and Adivasi women are imperiled to extreme forms of violence and inhuman treatment for asserting their rights”, adding, “It is in this context that there is need to have more schemes pertaining to access to justice and adequate compensation for Dalit and Adivasi women.”
“Moreover”, NCDHR says, “Large number of schemes is non-targeted in nature, which means there is no direct bearing on the lives of Dalit and Adivasi women”, adding, “The budget also failed to make allocations for alternate sexual identities such as transgenders, bisexuals, and intersex. The budget has completely invisibilised them and has failed to address intersectionality.”
NCDHR notes that there is an overall increase in allocations for SCs and STs in the 2019-20 budget by 35.6% for SCs and 28% for STs, adding, for the first time, 329 schemes for SCs and 338 schemes for STs have been set aside for their welfare.
“However”, the report claims, “If we place these figures, against the background of large scale poverty among SC, ST communities as well as against the guidelines issued by the Ministry of Finance, these schemes will not go far in addressing the development gap between SC-ST and the rest of the population.”
The proportion of targeted schemes is 42.82% for SCs and 40.9 % for STs, the report states, adding, the rest are “de facto general schemes, with a mask of SC or ST budget schemes. They do not qualify as SC, ST schemes that benefit the communities which it is intended to do.”
According to NCDHR, a “striking feature” of the 2019-20 budget is “the systemic undermining of number of critical schemes by starving them of necessary funds.”
These are related to Post Matric Scholarship, University Grants Commission, Rehabilitation of Bonded Labour, National Fellowship for SC, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sanghathan, Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti, Indira Gandhi National Open University, Grants to Voluntary Organisations, land records modernization etc.
All of them have been denied “direct benefit” of necessary funds for SC-ST development, it adds.
Then, says the report, allocations for the nodal ministry for SCs, Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, has been “significantly reduced compared to last year”, adding, “Other critical ministries which have witnessed steep declines in SC development are Rural Development, Micro Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) and Drinking Water and Sanitation.”
“Similarly, from the ST perspective, the critical ministries are MSME and Drinking Water and Sanitation with substantial decrease. There is only a marginal increase in allocations for the Ministry of Tribal Affairs (MoTA)”, the report asserts.
Similarly, the report states, “Majority of the huge allocations which are allocated in sub-plans are general in nature with no direct impact on the development of SC and ST communities. For example, the Income Support Scheme, which is renamed as Pradhan Mantri Kisan Samman Nidhi, with an allocation of Rs 12,450 crore, the Samagra Shiksha, with an allocation of Rs 7,264 crore, the National Rural Health Mission with allocation of Rs 6,611.47 crore all are general in nature.”

Comments

Uma said…
Shocking but not surprising

TRENDING

Buddhist shrines massively destroyed by Brahmanical rulers in "pre-Islamic" era: Historian DN Jha's survey

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Labelling a Jesuit a Marxist? It's like saying if you use a plane, you become American

Jesuits: Cedric Prakash, Stan Swamy By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ* A thirteen- fourteen-year-old has many dreams! That's an impressionable age; at the cusp of finishing school. It is also a time when one tastes a different kind of freedom: to go for camps with boys of your own age (not with ones family). Such camps and outings were always enjoyed to the hilt. The ones, however, which still remain etched in my memory are the mission camps to the Jesuit missions in Maharashtra and Gujarat.

Did Modi promote Dholavira, a UNESCO site now, as Gujarat CM? Facts don't tally

By Rajiv Shah  As would generally happen, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s tweet – that not only was he “absolutely delighted” with the news of UNESCO tag to Dholavira, but he “ first visited ” the site during his “student days and was mesmerised by the place” – is being doubted by his detractors. None of the two tweets, strangely, even recalls once that it’s a Harappan site in Gujarat.

Giant conglomerates 'favoured': Whither tribal rights for jal-jungle-jameen?

Prafull Samantara By Mohammad Irshad Ansari*  The struggle for “Jal, Jungle and Jameen” has been a long-drawn battle for the tribal communities of India. This tussle was once again in the limelight with the proposed diamond mining in the Buxwaha forest of Chhatarpur (Madhya Pradesh). The only difference in this movement was the massive social media support it gained, which actually seems to tilt the scale for the tribal people in a long time.

If not Modi, then who? Why? I (an ordinary citizen) am there! Main hoon naa!

By Mansee Bal Bhargava*  The number of women ministers is doubled in early July from the first term after cabinet reshuffle by the present government led by Narendra Modi. While there were 06 women ministers in the previous term, this term there are 11. The previous two governments led by Dr Manmohan Singh had 10 women ministers in each tenure. Are these number of women ministers something to rejoice in the near 75 years of independence? Yes maybe, if we think that things are slowly improving in the patriarchal system. This change is less likely to achieve gender balance in the parliament otherwise we require more than 11 as per the 33% reservation . This change is also less likely because the men politicians’ inability to handle the country’s mess is becoming more and more evident and especially during the corona crisis. Seems, the addition of more women ministers may be a result of the recent assembly elections where women played a decisive role in the election results. For example

Tussle between Modi-led BJP govt, Young India 'key to political battle': NAPM

Counterview Desk  In its month-long campaign, civil rights network National Alliance for People’s Movements (NAPM) carried out what it called Young People's Political Persecution and Resistance in “solidarity with all comrades facing political persecution and remembering human rights defender Stan Swamy…”

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Gujarat govt gender insensitive? Cyclone package for fisherfolk 'ignores' poor women

By Our Representative A memorandum submitted to the Gujarat government by various fisherfolk associations of the Saurashtra region of Gujarat under the leadership of Ahmedabad NGO Centre for Social Justice's senior activist Arvind Khuman, who is based in Amreli, has suggested that the relief package offered to the fishermen affected by the Tauktae cyclone is not only inadequate, it is also gender insensitive.

Debt bondage, forced labour, sexual abuse in Gujarat's Bt cottonseed farms: Dutch study

By Rajiv Shah  A just-released study, sponsored by a Netherlands-based non-profit, Arisa , “Seeds of Oppression Wage sharecropping in Bt cottonseed production in Gujarat, India”, has said that a new form of bondage, or forced labour, exists in North India’s Bt cottonseed farms, in which bhagiyas, or wage sharecroppers, are employed against advances and are then often required to work for years together “without regular payment of wages.”

Covid: We failed to stop religious, political events, admits Modi-dharmacharya meet

Counterview Desk An email alert sent by one the 11 participants, Prof Salim Engineer, on behalf of the Dharmik Jan Morcha regarding their "religious leaders' online meet" with Prime Minister Narendra Modi, even as offering "support to meet challenges of Corona pandemic", blames religious congregations, though without naming the Maha Kumbh and other religious events, which apparently were instrumental in the spread of the second wave.