Skip to main content

VB-GRAMG Act consultation process a 'farce': NREGA Sangharsh Morcha

By A Representative
 
The NREGA Sangharsh Morcha (NSM), a national platform of workers' organisations and activists associated with rural employment rights, has strongly opposed the introduction and proposed implementation of the VB-GRAMG Act, demanding an immediate halt to its rollout and a comprehensive consultation process involving workers and civil society groups.
In a press statement, the organisation criticized both the manner in which the legislation was enacted and the ongoing process of framing its rules. According to NSM, the VB-GRAMG Bill was "rushed through both Houses of Parliament in under a week," leaving no meaningful opportunity for NREGA workers, unions, or civil society organisations to participate in discussions on a law that would significantly impact rural workers across the country.
The group also questioned the credibility of the public consultation process for the draft rules of the Act. The draft rules were released on May 23, 2026, with comments invited until June 21. However, the Ministry of Rural Development (MoRD) has already announced that the new framework will come into force from July 1.
Calling the consultation exercise a "farce," NSM alleged that the Ministry has shown no intention of seriously considering public feedback before implementation.
"The consultation is plainly a farce; the Ministry has no intention of meaningfully engaging with public recommendations," the statement said.
The organisation urged the government to suspend implementation immediately and conduct proper consultations with worker representatives and civil society stakeholders. It cited recent examples of more extensive stakeholder engagement by government ministries, including consultations undertaken by the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology during the formulation of rules under the Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act.
NSM argued that the draft rules had been prepared through an opaque process and that stakeholders had been given insufficient time to study and respond to the proposals.
Describing NREGA as "a people's Act" born out of years of worker struggles and grassroots mobilisation, the organisation claimed that its replacement by the VB-GRAMG framework represented "a direct assault on worker rights."
The statement further alleged that the draft rules retained several controversial features that workers' organisations have opposed for years, particularly the compulsory use of technology-linked systems and what it termed "abysmally low wage rates."
According to NSM, the draft rules reinforce concerns that the government has failed to address long-standing demands raised by rural workers. "The draft rules make abundantly clear what worker unions have asserted for years: that the Modi Government has no concern for workers' interests," the organisation said.
The Morcha also expressed concern about the current state of employment under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), alleging that implementation has already suffered significant disruptions despite official assurances that the programme would continue smoothly until the transition to VB-GRAMG.
Citing Ministry data, NSM claimed that employment generated under NREGA in April 2026 was 57 per cent lower than in April 2025.
The organisation warned that proceeding with implementation without meaningful consultation would create confusion and hardship for millions of rural workers and their families.
Among its key demands, NSM called for the immediate and unconditional suspension of the VB-GRAMG rollout, the establishment of a fair and transparent consultation process with adequate participation from workers' representatives and civil society organisations, and a revision of the draft rules to address concerns related to technology-driven implementation mechanisms and wage rates.
"Proceeding without a legitimate consultation process will inevitably lead to chaos and cause further irreparable harm to workers and their families," the statement said, adding that the organisation would hold the government accountable for the consequences of any hurried implementation.

Comments

TRENDING

Sardar made up his mind on Pakistan in Dec 1946 "before" Mountbatten's Partition Plan

By Hari Desai* One has to be extra cautious while dealing with the history of towering personalities of the Indian freedom struggle, especially that of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel (October 31, 1875 - December 15, 1950). Present-day politicians prefer to "pronounce” on his life and quote him according to their convenience like a blind person describing an elephant.

To Sonam Wangchuk: 'Will undertake 70 hour solidarity fast in Gujarat'

By Martin Macwan *  Dear Colleague Sonam Wangchuk, I have never met you personally. I wrote a short article at the time of your arrest. Your work correctly introduces you. There is truth in your words. You have embarked on a fast, following the footsteps of Gandhiji. Your intention is to make people think. Your demand is reasonable; I believe that the resignation of a single education minister will not improve the state of education in India. However, the question you have raised is extremely important for the future generation of the marginalized. Education is the key to power, development, and progress, which empowers a citizen.

US civil society coalition slams Hudson Institute for hosting RSS leaders

By A Representative   The Hudson Institute ’s “New India Conference,” held on April 23, featured senior figures from India’s ruling political ecosystem, including RSS General Secretary Dattatreya Hosabale and BJP foreign affairs head Vijay Chauthaiwale . The event also included U.S. officials and former diplomats such as Kurt Campbell, Kenneth Juster, and Nisha Biswal, alongside India’s Ambassador to the U.S., Vinay Kwatra.