Skip to main content

Questions raised over govt’s high-level committee on demographic change

By A Representative 
The All India Feminist Alliance (ALIFA), a constituent of the National Alliance of People's Movements (NAPM), has urged the Union government to undertake a comprehensive review of the Terms of Reference (ToR) of the recently constituted High-Level Committee on Demographic Change, alleging that its mandate risks promoting social polarization rather than advancing an evidence-based understanding of India's demographic challenges.
In a statement, ALIFA expressed concern over the committee notified by the Union Ministry of Home Affairs on May 26, 2026, following Prime Minister Narendra Modi's announcement of a "High-Powered Demography Mission" during his Independence Day address on August 15, 2025. The alliance argued that the committee's mandate appears to be disproportionately focused on issues of "illegal immigration" and demographic changes among religious and social communities, rather than addressing the broader spectrum of demographic transformations taking place across the country.
The committee is chaired by Prakash Prabhakar Navlekar and includes former bureaucrats Durga Shankar Mishra and Balaji Srivastava, economist Shamika Ravi, and the Census Commissioner as members.
According to ALIFA, seven of the committee's eight action points make reference to "illegal immigration" or "illegal migrants," while the remaining point calls for an analysis of structural population changes among religious and social communities. The alliance contends that such a framework effectively narrows the scope of demographic inquiry and predetermines the direction of the committee's findings.
The feminist collective argued that demography encompasses a much wider range of issues, including fertility and mortality trends, ageing populations, gender ratios, internal and external migration, urbanization, changing family structures, regional disparities, and the social consequences of economic development. It maintained that any serious demographic study should examine these factors comprehensively and assess their social, economic, cultural and political implications at national, state and local levels.
ALIFA stated that an independent demographic review should be based on rigorous evidence and constitutional principles rather than assumptions linking population changes primarily to immigration and demographic imbalance. The organization expressed concern that the committee's current mandate emphasizes border management, identification systems, detention and deportation mechanisms, potentially framing demographic change through a security lens.
The alliance further argued that demographic anxieties have historically been used to justify interventions in reproductive choices and heightened surveillance of marginalized communities. It warned that portraying demographic change as a threat associated with specific religious or social groups could deepen social divisions and reinforce discriminatory practices.
Referring to recent electoral verification exercises, ALIFA claimed that approaches centered on identifying alleged illegal immigrants have had disproportionate impacts on women and Muslim communities. The organization cautioned that similar assumptions embedded within demographic policymaking could contribute to exclusionary outcomes.
The alliance also questioned the timing of the committee's work, noting that India is currently undertaking the Census process. It called on the government to defer the committee's activities until the Census is completed, arguing that a comprehensive and transparent enumeration exercise would provide a more reliable demographic baseline for policymaking.
ALIFA maintained that policies addressing demographic challenges should emerge from robust Census data and objective analysis rather than from pre-existing assumptions. Proceeding without such a foundation, it said, risks producing predetermined conclusions and policy recommendations that may not accurately reflect demographic realities.
Concluding its statement, the alliance urged the government to ensure that any assessment of demographic change is methodologically transparent, federally coordinated, independent in character, and guided by constitutional values and human rights principles. India's demographic future, it said, should be approached through the lenses of justice, equality and human development rather than narratives rooted in suspicion and fear.

Comments

TRENDING

Manufacturing, services: India's low-skill, middle-skill labour remains underemployed

By Francis Kuriakose* The Indian economy was in a state of deceleration well before Covid-19 made its impact in early 2020. This can be inferred from the declining trends of four important macroeconomic variables that indicate the health of the economy in the last quarter of 2019.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”

Food security? Gujarat govt puts more than 5 lakh ration cards in the 'silent' category

By Pankti Jog* A new statistical report uploaded by the Gujarat government on the national food security portal shows that ensuring food security for the marginalized community is still not a priority of the state. The statistical report, uploaded on December 24, highlights many weaknesses in implementing the National Food Security Act (NFSA) in state.