Skip to main content

Questions raised over govt’s high-level committee on demographic change

By A Representative 
The All India Feminist Alliance (ALIFA), a constituent of the National Alliance of People's Movements (NAPM), has urged the Union government to undertake a comprehensive review of the Terms of Reference (ToR) of the recently constituted High-Level Committee on Demographic Change, alleging that its mandate risks promoting social polarization rather than advancing an evidence-based understanding of India's demographic challenges.
In a statement, ALIFA expressed concern over the committee notified by the Union Ministry of Home Affairs on May 26, 2026, following Prime Minister Narendra Modi's announcement of a "High-Powered Demography Mission" during his Independence Day address on August 15, 2025. The alliance argued that the committee's mandate appears to be disproportionately focused on issues of "illegal immigration" and demographic changes among religious and social communities, rather than addressing the broader spectrum of demographic transformations taking place across the country.
The committee is chaired by Prakash Prabhakar Navlekar and includes former bureaucrats Durga Shankar Mishra and Balaji Srivastava, economist Shamika Ravi, and the Census Commissioner as members.
According to ALIFA, seven of the committee's eight action points make reference to "illegal immigration" or "illegal migrants," while the remaining point calls for an analysis of structural population changes among religious and social communities. The alliance contends that such a framework effectively narrows the scope of demographic inquiry and predetermines the direction of the committee's findings.
The feminist collective argued that demography encompasses a much wider range of issues, including fertility and mortality trends, ageing populations, gender ratios, internal and external migration, urbanization, changing family structures, regional disparities, and the social consequences of economic development. It maintained that any serious demographic study should examine these factors comprehensively and assess their social, economic, cultural and political implications at national, state and local levels.
ALIFA stated that an independent demographic review should be based on rigorous evidence and constitutional principles rather than assumptions linking population changes primarily to immigration and demographic imbalance. The organization expressed concern that the committee's current mandate emphasizes border management, identification systems, detention and deportation mechanisms, potentially framing demographic change through a security lens.
The alliance further argued that demographic anxieties have historically been used to justify interventions in reproductive choices and heightened surveillance of marginalized communities. It warned that portraying demographic change as a threat associated with specific religious or social groups could deepen social divisions and reinforce discriminatory practices.
Referring to recent electoral verification exercises, ALIFA claimed that approaches centered on identifying alleged illegal immigrants have had disproportionate impacts on women and Muslim communities. The organization cautioned that similar assumptions embedded within demographic policymaking could contribute to exclusionary outcomes.
The alliance also questioned the timing of the committee's work, noting that India is currently undertaking the Census process. It called on the government to defer the committee's activities until the Census is completed, arguing that a comprehensive and transparent enumeration exercise would provide a more reliable demographic baseline for policymaking.
ALIFA maintained that policies addressing demographic challenges should emerge from robust Census data and objective analysis rather than from pre-existing assumptions. Proceeding without such a foundation, it said, risks producing predetermined conclusions and policy recommendations that may not accurately reflect demographic realities.
Concluding its statement, the alliance urged the government to ensure that any assessment of demographic change is methodologically transparent, federally coordinated, independent in character, and guided by constitutional values and human rights principles. India's demographic future, it said, should be approached through the lenses of justice, equality and human development rather than narratives rooted in suspicion and fear.

Comments

TRENDING

A fearless spirit lost: Rebecca Thomson dies at 17-hour Catalina Swim Mark

By Harsh Thakor  On July 26, 2026, Rebecca “Becky” Thomson suffered cardiac arrest while attempting the Catalina Channel Swim — a marathon open water crossing from Catalina Island to the California mainland. After swimming for 17 hours, Thomson collapsed in the water. Despite the painstaking efforts of emergency responders and the medical staff at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, she succumbed to a devastating hypoxic brain injury and died Friday evening.

An open letter to PM: Before you forgive, ask for forgiveness

By Martin Macwan*  Respected Prime Minister,  The first step toward true forgiveness is asking for it, and it is out of respect for the Constitution that the title "Honourable" is used for the office of the Prime Minister. Every abuse is "dirty" because almost all abuse is uttered with the conscious intention of publicly humiliating a woman, much like the disrobing of Draupadi in the royal court. This includes remarks like "Jersey Cow," used at public meetings on the Gujarati land of Gandhi and Sardar; comparing a female MP's laughter in India's Parliament to "Surpanakha's laugh"; and using a vulgar address like "Didi O Didi" for a Chief Minister who holds a respected position in a democracy—along with every other such remark. In the 79-year history of independent India, you are better placed than anyone to say which Prime Minister has used such language against women.

Women's groups, feminists hail wrestlers' courage, vow to continue fight after Brij Bhushan acquittal

By A Representative   In a powerful show of solidarity, more than 250 prominent feminists and members of women's organisations across India have condemned the acquittal of former BJP MP and ex-Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) president Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh in the high-profile sexual harassment case filed by six women wrestlers. The signatories have expressed unwavering support for the wrestlers who have waged a courageous legal battle for justice against formidable odds.