Skip to main content

PUCL, activists call rejection of Natarajan’s nomination ‘legally untenable’

By A Representative 
The People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), along with several civil society organizations, legal professionals, academics and activists, has submitted an urgent petition to the Election Commission of India (ECI) challenging the rejection of Congress leader Meenakshi Natarajan's nomination for the Rajya Sabha Biennial Election 2026 from Madhya Pradesh.
In the petition addressed to the Chief Election Commissioner, the signatories have sought immediate intervention under Article 324 of the Constitution to set aside the June 9 order of the Returning Officer, Arvind Sharma, who rejected Natarajan’s nomination on the ground that she had allegedly failed to disclose a criminal case in her election affidavit.
The petition argues that the case cited against Natarajan is a private complaint filed under Section 223 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, in which no court has taken cognizance of any offence. According to the petitioners, a summons issued to Natarajan was merely part of the mandatory pre-cognizance procedure and cannot be treated as evidence that cognizance had been taken by the Magistrate. They contend that several recent judicial pronouncements have clarified that disclosure obligations arise only after cognizance of an offence is taken or charges are framed.
The petition further states that under Section 33A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, candidates are required to disclose only those criminal cases in which a competent court has taken cognizance or framed charges. Since neither condition applies in Natarajan’s case, the petitioners maintain that no disclosure obligation existed.
The signatories have also asserted that Natarajan was not named as an accused in the complaint and that no specific criminal offence was alleged against her. They argue that she was merely listed as a respondent for the purpose of being heard under the BNSS procedure before any decision on cognizance.
Describing the Returning Officer’s decision as “manifestly erroneous” and contrary to settled legal principles, the petition claims that the rejection effectively disenfranchises 62 Congress MLAs in the Madhya Pradesh Assembly who, according to the petition, constitute a sufficient strength to elect her to the Upper House.
Invoking the Election Commission’s plenary powers under Article 324, the petition urges the Commission to restore Natarajan’s candidature, direct the Returning Officer to follow the established legal position regarding candidate disclosures, and take all necessary steps to safeguard the integrity of the electoral process.
The petition has been signed by PUCL President Kavita Srivastava and General Secretary V. Suresh, along with prominent activists and public figures including Aruna Roy, Nikhil Dey, Shankar Singh, Meera Sanghamitra and several others from civil society organizations across the country. 

Comments

Post a Comment

TRENDING

Can free‑living Indian street dogs teach us about how to care for pet dogs?

By Daniel Ramp, Kapil Vishwas Patwardhan, Rosalie Chapple  We give our pet dogs shelter, veterinary care, affection, training and play. We decide when they eat, where they sleep, when they go outside, who they meet, and how they move through the world.
Post a Comment
»

Grain vs. gasoline: How the global biofuel boom threatens India’s food and water security

By Rajiv Shah  A new report published by the international research and advocacy organization GRAIN has warned that the global resurgence of biofuels is triggering a dangerous dynamic of “more fuel, less food, more land grabs.” Driven by intersecting energy security concerns, geopolitical tensions, and aggressive decarbonization mandates, the expanding agrofuel industry is increasingly pitting corporate energy interests against global food security and indigenous land rights. 
Post a Comment
»

Sikkim governor row: ALIFA asks centre to explain hurried appointment in Ankita Bhandari case

By A Representative   The All-India Feminist Alliance (ALIFA) on Saturday expressed “immense pain and outrage” that even after four years and a national uproar, justice has not been fully delivered in the Ankita Bhandari murder case and that a ruling party politician facing allegations has been “gifted a high-ranking constitutional office.” In a statement, ALIFA extended “unflinching solidarity” to Ankita’s parents, who it said are “fighting for justice on the streets of Delhi,” and demanded that pending the CBI inquiry and judicial decision, the appointment of BJP leader Dushyant Kumar Gautam as Sikkim’s Governor be subject to “immediate presidential review.”
Post a Comment
»