Skip to main content

Trump’s tariff war: A self-inflicted wound to 'Make America Great Again'?

By N.S. Venkataraman* 
Ever since Donald Trump assumed office for his second term as President of the United States a few weeks ago, he has spoken about imposing tariffs on various countries more than any other single subject.
Trump appears to believe that imposing tariffs on imports from selected countries is a sure way to achieve his pet goal: “Make America Great Again.” He seems convinced that every country is gaining at the expense of the U.S. in one way or another in trade, justifying tariffs as a necessary measure. Furthermore, he assumes that other nations will simply yield to his "tariff commands" without resistance.
While Trump is entitled to prioritize “America First,” every other country also has the right to protect its economic and trade interests. As a result, they will undoubtedly explore ways to counter Trump’s “tariff onslaught.”
In today’s world, economic considerations largely shape international relations. When the U.S. imposes tariffs unilaterally, affected countries are bound to retaliate sooner or later—perhaps sooner rather than later.
It is true that the U.S. remains the world's strongest nation in terms of military power, economic influence, and overall prosperity. However, this does not mean it is immune to international pressure. Just as Trump is attempting to pressure other nations, those countries could unite to challenge his tariff policies in ways he may not anticipate.
The U.S. is a major consumer market, making it an attractive destination for global trade. However, if high tariffs make the U.S. market less appealing, affected countries will inevitably seek alternative markets.
The U.S. economy is projected to exceed $30.3 trillion by 2025, maintaining its position as the world’s largest economy. However, China’s economy is also expanding rapidly, with an estimated nominal GDP of $18.68 trillion in 2025, growing at around 4.5%.
With a population far larger than that of the U.S. and a rising economy, China’s overall consumption level could soon surpass that of the U.S. If this happens, the Chinese market may become a more attractive trading partner than the increasingly tariff-restricted U.S. market.
Trump has already imposed tariffs on China, Canada, and Mexico, while also threatening to do so on India and the European Union. Only Trump knows which other countries he might target next.
While Trump appears to be launching a global tariff war, he is also trying to position himself as a peacemaker—two conflicting roles. Given that economic relationships influence global diplomacy, it is difficult to be both a peacemaker and a trade war instigator at the same time.
In his peace efforts, Trump has taken strong positions that some do not view as genuine. His perceived bias in conflicts—favoring Israel in the Gaza crisis and Russia in the Ukraine war—has led many observers to conclude that his peace initiatives are neither neutral nor credible.
One of the biggest challenges Trump may face is the growing influence of BRICS, an economic bloc led largely by China. Many nations are showing interest in joining BRICS, which could weaken U.S. dominance.
By reducing support for Ukraine, Trump has antagonized European nations, potentially straining the U.S.-Europe alliance. If BRICS introduces a global currency to compete with the U.S. dollar, America could find itself in a vulnerable position—one that Trump’s tariff weapon may be unable to counter.
Ultimately, imposing tariffs could backfire on the U.S. itself. Higher import duties will make foreign goods more expensive for American consumers, particularly for products that the U.S. does not produce in sufficient quantities.
In the coming months, Trump’s tariff policies may serve as a cautionary tale—demonstrating that no single nation can impose its will on others in an increasingly interconnected global economy.
---
*Trustee, Nandini Voice For The Deprived, Chennai

Comments

TRENDING

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”

Manufacturing, services: India's low-skill, middle-skill labour remains underemployed

By Francis Kuriakose* The Indian economy was in a state of deceleration well before Covid-19 made its impact in early 2020. This can be inferred from the declining trends of four important macroeconomic variables that indicate the health of the economy in the last quarter of 2019.

Food security? Gujarat govt puts more than 5 lakh ration cards in the 'silent' category

By Pankti Jog* A new statistical report uploaded by the Gujarat government on the national food security portal shows that ensuring food security for the marginalized community is still not a priority of the state. The statistical report, uploaded on December 24, highlights many weaknesses in implementing the National Food Security Act (NFSA) in state.