Covid-19 emergency a scientific measure? UHO releases public questionnaire ahead of fifth lockdown anniversary

By A Representative

As India approaches the five-year anniversary of its nationwide lockdown imposed on March 25, 2020, the United Health Organization (UHO) is inviting the public to engage in a thought-provoking exercise. The lockdown, introduced as a response to the COVID-19 emergency, was touted as a scientific measure to control the pandemic's spread. Five years on, the UHO seeks to evaluate how various aspects of the COVID-19 response align with data and scientific evidence.

Bhaskaran Raman, speaking about the initiative, stated, "This is with the motive of educating people about the science and to make them think." His words underscore the importance of reflecting on one of the most significant global events of our time.

To mark this milestone, UHO has released a five-question series aimed at encouraging critical thinking and scientific inquiry. The initiative is particularly directed at science enthusiasts, including the youth, urging them to reflect on key elements of pandemic response, such as lockdowns, testing, mask usage, and vaccine data. Participants' answers will be published on the UHO website on March 31, 2025.

The Five Questions:

1. What does scientific evidence say about the effectiveness of lockdowns in saving lives?

- Lockdown saved millions of lives worldwide, and it helped the economy.

- Lockdown saved a lot of lives but affected the economy.

- Lockdown reduced Covid deaths but not other causes of death.

- Lockdown increased Covid deaths as well as overall deaths.

2. What was the impact of Sweden's decision to keep schools open during the pandemic?

- Sweden's children and teachers paid a heavy price for keeping schools open.

- Neither children nor teachers were affected disproportionately, and Sweden had among the least overall excess deaths.

- Children were not affected but teachers suffered.

- Children were affected but not teachers.

3. What does the RT-PCR test detect?

- Presence of live and infectious virus.

- Presence of live virus but may not be infectious.

- Presence of viral fragments which could simply be dead virus.

- Presence of infectious virus but may not be live.

4. How effective are masks, based on the best available scientific evidence?

- Masks are about 80-100% effective in preventing Covid.

- Masks are about 50% effective.

- N95 masks are 95% effective but not cloth masks.

- Neither N95 masks nor cloth masks have a benefit in preventing Covid spread.

5. What is the status of long-term safety and efficacy data from COVID-19 vaccine trials?

- Covaxin.

- Covishield.

- Pfizer.

- Moderna.

- None of them.

Encouraging Participation

Readers can scan the provided QR code or visit this link to participate online. The first 20 correct responses in each age category will receive a book as a token of appreciation.

Through this initiative, UHO aims to foster a deeper understanding of the science behind the pandemic response and stimulate meaningful discussions. By questioning, reflecting, and learning from the past, the organization hopes to inspire informed perspectives for future challenges.

Comments

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman* In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

From Puri to the State: How Odisha turned the dream of drinkable tap water into policy

By Hans Harelimana Hirwa, Mansee Bal Bhargava Drinking water directly from the tap is generally associated with developed countries where it is considered safe and potable. Only about 50 countries around the world offer drinkable tap water, with the majority located in Europe and North America, and a few in Asia and Oceania. Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Singapore have the highest-quality tap water, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Japan, the USA, Australia, the UK, Costa Rica, and Chile.

Michael Parenti: Scholar known for critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy

By Harsh Thakor* Michael Parenti, an American political scientist, historian, and author known for his Marxist and anti-imperialist perspectives, died on January 24 at the age of 92. Over several decades, Parenti wrote and lectured extensively on issues of capitalism, imperialism, democracy, media, and U.S. foreign policy. His work consistently challenged dominant political and economic narratives, particularly those associated with Western liberal democracies and global capitalism.

Search This Blog