Why is there slowdown in productivity growth despite rise of IT-driven digital environment?

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak

From the World Wide Web to generative artificial intelligence, the ever-changing landscape of digitalization defines this century. From the 16-megabyte floppy disk, CDs and DVDs to multi-terabyte digital storage devices and online storage drives, the rapid evolution of innovative products and processes in digitalization is evident. These advancements are constantly accelerating due to ongoing research and developments in science and technology.

The pace of change is so rapid that one must be a continuous learner to keep up with daily digital advancements. Digitalization has enhanced human welfare and social progress with the rise of information technology and communication. It has increased the speed of information, accessibility of goods and services to people with purchasing power and digital links. Digitalization has also increased the productive power of labour.

However, digitalization is not necessarily leading to increased productivity growth. Such a slowdown is called digital productivity paradox. It refers to the slowdown in productivity growth despite the rise of an information technology-driven digital environment, where the nature of work, workers, and the workplace is increasingly shaped by digitalization. Prof. Erik Brynjolfsson termed it “The Productivity Paradox of IT,” building on the work of Prof. Robert Solow. As a result, it is often referred to as the Solow Paradox. This puzzle of digitalization in terms the Solow Paradox has continued to expand over the last two decades. It appears that the slowdown in productivity growth and the rise of digitalization is occurring simultaneously.

There are several reasons behind the slowdown in productivity growth during digitalization. Unlike past technological innovations, digitalization exhibits inherent class and urban biases. The digital divide is its inevitable outcome. The process is largely controlled by a few individuals and their large platform companies, giving these corporations an unfair advantage in leveraging digitalization for productivity growth. Meanwhile, many small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) have struggled to reap its benefits. As a result, digitalization has reinforced the dominance of large corporations over people and their productive capacities. The concentration of power in the hands of these dominant corporations and their digital partners has led to a decline in creative competition, stifling new innovations that could drive productivity growth. The diminishing digital dividend and the slowdown in productivity growth are thus integral aspects of digital capitalism.

Public investment in digitalization by states and governments largely benefits large corporations. For example, the National Science Foundation funds various technological innovations using American taxpayers' money, yet private multinational companies like Apple Inc. reap the benefits. This is not unique to the United States but reflects a global pattern where public funds are used to fuel the expansion of private corporations. This trend has only intensified with the advancement of digitalization under digital capitalism.

Technology can enhance the productive power of labour only when workers have access to it and receive adequate technological training. The slowdown in productivity growth is not inherent to digital technology itself but rather stems from the way it is accessed, owned, managed, controlled, and distributed by a select few. Digital capitalism, like all forms of capitalism, acts as a barrier to the democratization of digitalization, leading to stagnation, corporate dominance, and a decline in productivity growth. Therefore, democratizing digital technology—through inclusive innovation, research and development, public ownership, equitable control, fair distribution, and transparent management—is essential to bridging the digital divide and reversing the slowdown in productivity growth.

The availability and accessibility of technology, technological education, training, platforms, and a digital environment for all are central to overcoming the capitalist-driven slowdown in productivity growth. This approach is essential to creating an egalitarian, transparent, democratic and prosperous digital world that is free from inequality and exploitation.

Comments

10,000 students deprived of classes as Ahmedabad school remains shut: MCC writes to Gujarat CM

By A Representative The Minority Coordination Committee (MCC) has written to Gujarat Chief Minister Bhupendra Patel, urging him to immediately reopen the Seventh Day Adventist School in Maninagar, Ahmedabad, where classes have been suspended for nearly two weeks. The MCC claims that the suspension, following a violent incident, violates the constitutional right to education of thousands of children.

Gujarat minority rights group seeks suspension of Botad police officials for brutal assault on minor

By A Representative A human rights group, the Minority Coordination Committee (MCC) Gujarat, has written to the Director General of Police (DGP), Gandhinagar, demanding the immediate suspension and criminal action against police personnel of Botad police station for allegedly brutally assaulting a minor boy from the Muslim community.

On Teachers’ Day, remembering Mother Teresa as the teacher of compassion

By Fr. Cedric Prakash SJ It is Teachers’ Day once again! Significantly, the day also marks the Feast of St. Teresa of Calcutta (still lovingly called Mother Teresa). In 2012, the United Nations, as a fitting tribute to her, declared this day the International Day of Charity. A day pregnant with meaning—one that we must celebrate as meaningfully as possible.

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor* This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Targeted eviction of Bengali-speaking Muslims across Assam districts alleged

By A Representative A delegation led by prominent academic and civil rights leader Sandeep Pandey visited three districts in Assam—Goalpara, Dhubri, and Lakhimpur—between 2 and 4 September 2025 to meet families affected by recent demolitions and evictions. The delegation reported widespread displacement of Bengali-speaking Muslim communities, many of whom possess valid citizenship documents including Aadhaar, voter ID, ration cards, PAN cards, and NRC certification.

Gandhiji quoted as saying his anti-untouchability view has little space for inter-dining with "lower" castes

By A Representative A senior activist close to Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA) leader Medha Patkar has defended top Booker prize winning novelist Arundhati Roy’s controversial utterance on Gandhiji that “his doctrine of nonviolence was based on an acceptance of the most brutal social hierarchy the world has ever known, the caste system.” Surprised at the police seeking video footage and transcript of Roy’s Mahatma Ayyankali memorial lecture at the Kerala University on July 17, Nandini K Oza in a recent blog quotes from available sources to “prove” that Gandhiji indeed believed in “removal of untouchability within the caste system.”

'Govts must walk the talk on gender equality, right to health, human rights to deliver SDGs by 2030'

By A Representative With just 64 months left to deliver on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), global health and rights advocates have called upon governments to honour their commitments on gender equality and the human right to health. Speaking ahead of the 80th United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), experts warned that rising anti-rights and anti-gender pushes are threatening hard-won progress on SDG-3 (health and wellbeing) and SDG-5 (gender equality).

Is U.S. fast losing its financial and technological edge under Trump’s second tenure?

By Dr. Manoj Kumar Mishra* The United States, along with its Western European allies, once promoted globalization as a democratic force that would deliver shared prosperity and balanced growth. That promise has unraveled. Globalization, instead of building an even world, has produced one defined by inequality, asymmetry of power, and new vulnerabilities. For decades, Washington successfully turned this system to its advantage. Today, however, under Trump’s second administration, America is attempting to exploit the weaknesses of others without acknowledging how exposed it has become itself.

What mainstream economists won’t tell you about Chinese modernisation

By Shiran Illanperuma China’s modernisation has been one of the most remarkable processes of the 21st century and one that has sparked endless academic debate. Meng Jie (孟捷), a distinguished professor from the School of Marxism at Fudan University in Shanghai, has spent the better part of his career unpacking this process to better understand what has taken place.

Counterview

Search This Blog