Skip to main content

Poverty isn't just a seven letter word; what about nutrition, sanitation, infant mortality?

Counterview Desk
In an interview to Counterview, well-known economist Prof Amitabh Kundu* seeks to look at the reasons behind the controversy surrounding the working papers of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) which report low or no poverty for India in the years of the pandemic or before that.
He says, “Unfortunately, no attempt is made to determine any poverty basket and check if the poverty line is adequate to buy that. Meeting the basic human needs, thus, is not the basic concern in the current poverty debate as it is argued that such needs cannot be decided in any robust manner.”

Text:

Q: How do you look at the low figures of poverty in India in the context of deprivation figures for Indian population in different spheres?
A: India witnessed lakhs of migrants walking thousands of kilometres with children in their hands from India’s urban centre to their homes in rural areas during the first year of the pandemic. Nor is it a secret that thousands died on the streets and around the hospitals due to lack of beds and oxygen. Yet there have been claims, particularly by international organisations, that the level of poverty in India has considerably gone down, or it is almost negligible. Clearly, there is an anomaly.
The problems faced by common people, particularly those at the bottom rung of the society, are those of management and governance and cannot be attributed to poverty, it is being argued. But what about the National Family Health Survey recording the infant mortality rate (IMR) to have gone down only marginally from 40.7 to 35.2 per thousand between the two rounds covering 2015-16 and 2019-21? Or, the percentage of anaemic children aged 6 to 59 months, pregnant and non-pregnant women and adult males have gone up significantly during the period?
These indicators, we are told, are no proxies for poverty. Their linkages with nutritional indicators are considered tenuous, as these can be explained in terms of intra-household distribution, poor dietary habits, improper water/sanitation facilities etc. Not without reason, there is uproar about the working papers of the World Bank and IMF that report low or no poverty for India in the years of the pandemic or before that.
The real question is what does the poverty index measure or attempt to capture? The construction of the index involves complex calculations to identify a poverty basket of consumption, working out price indices for updation of poverty line, and then applying these to the income or consumption of households for determining the poverty status. Unfortunately, no attempt is made now to determine any poverty basket and check if the povery line is adequate to buy that. Meeting the basic human needs, thus, is not the basic concern in the current poverty debate as it is argued that such needs cannot be decided in any robust manner.
Q: How has the delinking of poverty from nutrition has taken place in Indian poverty literature?
A: A nine member Working Group set up by the Planning Commission proposed the poverty line at Rs 20 per capita per month in early 1960s, loosely ensuring adequacy of minimum requirements. VM Dandekar and Nilakantha Rath (1970) went into details of minimum calorie needs, based on the average consumption pattern. During 1980s and 1990s, it was realised that this linkage is getting blurred due to changes in the consumption pattern, changing micro environment for living, withdrawal of the state in provision of basic necessities etc.
PV Sukhatme argued that the emphasis on calorie and nutrition is misplaced as the absorption of nutrients in the body depends on physical health, particularly presence or absence of gastrointestinal diseases. Water and sanitation facilities were noted as important in determining the poverty line in the absence of which, out of pocket expenditure of the household on these and health would shoot up.
Indeed, engagement of the state in providing the basic necessities free or at subsidised rates would lower the household expenditure required to cross over the poverty line. BS Minhas’ exhaustive work too suggested that calorie/nutrient requirements are largely socially and culturally determined and even the biological needs vary from person to person within a household.
It was accepted that the state through poverty intervention cannot and should not try to guarantee adequate nutrition or health to people. The Tendulkar Committee formally announced delinking of nutritional norms from poverty in 2009. Subsequently, efforts to bring dietary factors into poverty domain by the Rangarajan Committee received lukewarm response from the policy makers.
As a young Assistant Professor at the Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), I have observed the transition taking place. I recall Dr DT Lakdawala beseeching Dr B. S. Minhas at a seminar “not to remove the pegs on with the whole poverty debate hangs.” He thought that poverty has a special punch and force in policy discourse at national and global level, because people consider it to be linked with human deprivation, suffering, and absence of basic necessities. If it is reduced to a number which is temporally and cross sectionally comparable but lacks in content of suffering, it will cease to be an instrument in the hands of researchers and civil society to pressurise the government for appropriate welfare policies.
Q: How has the Working Paper, prepared by the IMF computed poverty figures for the recent years when there has been no Consumption Expenditure Survey whose results have been accepted by the government?
A: The results of the NSS consumption expenditure for 2017-18 have been rejected by the government as being not comparable with those of previous rounds. The computation of poverty has thus become extremely challenging in the absence of the data on consumption expenditure, as is the case in India today, as also in several developing countries. With a view to providing inputs into policy making, researchers have evolved ingenious methods of estimating the data, using the past datasets and those where the samples are not representative of the households in the country.
One must compliment Surjit Bhalla, Karan Bhasin and Arvind Virmani who have taken up this challenge in their IMF Working Paper of developing a method of interpolation and extrapolation of the consumption expenditure of the NSS survey of 2011-12 and build a series up to 2019-20. They come out with definite numbers. It would only be fair to consider these seriously to examine the extent to which these maintain temporal and cross section comparability and, more importantly, what exactly do they capture or can convey to policy makers.
They use the growth rate of the private final consumption expenditure (PFCE), but bring in the distributional changes by allowing the households consumption to grow as per the growth in nominal per capita income in each state.
Computation of poverty has become extremely challenging in the absence of data on consumption expenditure
Rural urban price differences are also introduced through separate poverty lines for rural and urban households. The method is reasonable -- except that it assumes the distributions to remain unchanged, both within the rural and urban segments in each state over the period 2014-20.
Objections have been raised regarding updating household expenditure by the growth in PFCE, as it is estimated as a residual in national income accounts and therefore includes many other components such as expenditure of unincorporated enterprises. Also, with regard to the extent to which government hospitals and non-profit organisations transfer benefits to households, there will be double counting.
It may, on the other hand, be noted that the expenditure data collected from households do not include rental payments. However, considering the pluses and minuses, updating consumption expenditure by PFCE enhances the estimated value. One wonders if there could be other multipliers for updating the figures, free from these problems .
Q: What could have been done to bring in distributional changes realistically in rural and urban areas within the states in the IMF Working Paper?
A: The first suggestion would be to multiply the figure of consumption expenditure of each household by the growth rate of income in the economic activity with which the household is associated, since the authors consider using income growth as a possible basis for projection. Secondly, the growth rates of different commodities in the PFCE are significantly different and hence adjustments can be done commodity wise, to bring focus on items of consumption by the poor, across the states.
Q: What do you think of bringing in the subsidised and free food grains given to poor households, in the poverty calculations in the IMF paper?
A: The most significant contribution of the study is its bringing in differential engagement of the state in provisioning of the essentials to the poor into poverty calculations. The public distribution system (PDS) off take of the poor has doubled after implementation of the National Food Security Act after 2014. The provisioning of extra food grains per person per month free of cost since March 2020 has also been built into the real expenditure of the poor.
This, however, opens up the possibility of bringing in the changes in the level of state engagement in provisioning of essentials, including free gas cylinders etc. within the framework of calculations. However, this must be supplemented by an assessment of the disengagement of the state in crucial social sectors such as education and health. Incremental expenditure of the poor on health and education in recent years, as estimated through NSS data, would have to be considered by revising up the poverty line.
Q: What is your opinion regarding the methodology and poverty calculations in the Working Paper of the World Bank?
A: The paper by Sutirtha Sinha Roy and Roy van der Weide for the World Bank, released recently. explores the possibility of using Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE) data in poverty calculations after correcting for the unrepresentative character of the panel data, by modifying the weightages of households for aggregation. Indeed, the asset position and level of basic amenities are generally higher in the CMIE sample than in more robust national sources, basically due the former’s sampling procedure.
These adjustments carried out to remove the non-convergence of the CMIE data with others at macro level have resulted in a poverty figure of 12 per cent. This, many people find more acceptable not because of the methodology but the magnitude. One does not know whether the poverty estimate would be a bit higher had the adjustments been carried out for a few other parameters and also at the state level.
Q: Any concluding observation?
A: The efforts of all the scholars in building up appropriate data sets, given that the decade 2011-21 has been disastrous for macro data, may be commendable. But let it be clear, there is no royal road to statistics. Let these exercises be not similar to the search of the proverbial smart man for his wallet under a lamppost. Being asked, he answered that he dropped it somewhere near the dark gutter but insisted on not searching there since there was no light.
---
*Senior Fellow with the Sustainable Cities and Transport program at WRI India; former professor, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi

Comments

TRENDING

Vaccine nationalism? Covaxin isn't safe either, perhaps it's worse: Experts

By Rajiv Shah  I was a little awestruck: The news had already spread that Astrazeneca – whose Indian variant Covishield was delivered to nearly 80% of Indian vaccine recipients during the Covid-19 era – has been withdrawn by the manufacturers following the admission by its UK pharma giant that its Covid-19 vector-based vaccine in “rare” instances cause TTS, or “thrombocytopenia thrombosis syndrome”, which lead to the blood to clump and form clots. The vaccine reportedly led to at least 81 deaths in the UK.

'Scientifically flawed': 22 examples of the failure of vaccine passports

By Vratesh Srivastava*   Vaccine passports were introduced in late 2021 in a number of places across the world, with the primary objective of curtailing community spread and inducing "vaccine hesitant" people to get vaccinated, ostensibly to ensure herd immunity. The case for vaccine passports was scientifically flawed and ethically questionable.

'Misleading' ads: Are our celebrities and public figures acting responsibly?

By Deepika* It is imperative for celebrities and public figures to act responsibly while endorsing a consumer product, the Supreme Court said as it recently clamped down on misleading advertisements.

Magnetic, stunning, Protima Bedi 'exposed' malice of sexual repression in society

By Harsh Thakor*  Protima Bedi was born to a baniya businessman and a Bengali mother as Protima Gupta in Delhi in 1949. Her father was a small-time trader, who was thrown out of his family for marrying a dark Bengali women. The theme of her early life was to rebel against traditional bondage. It was extraordinary how Protima underwent a metamorphosis from a conventional convent-educated girl into a freak. On October 12th was her 75th birthday; earlier this year, on August 18th it was her 25th death anniversary.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Palm oil industry 'deceptively using' geenwashing to market products

By Athena*  Corporate hypocrisy is a masterclass in manipulation that mostly remains undetected by consumers and citizens. Companies often boast about their environmental and social responsibilities. Yet their actions betray these promises, creating a chasm between their public image and the grim on-the-ground reality. This duplicity and severely erodes public trust and undermines the strong foundations of our society.

'Fake encounter': 12 Adivasis killed being dubbed Maoists, says FACAM

Counterview Desk   The civil rights network* Forum Against Corporatization and Militarization (FACAM), even as condemn what it has called "fake encounter" of 12 Adivasi villagers in Gangaloor, has taken strong exception to they being presented by the authorities as Maoists.

No compensation to family, reluctance to file FIR: Manual scavengers' death

By Arun Khote, Sanjeev Kumar*  Recently, there have been four instances of horrifying deaths of sewer/septic tank workers in Uttar Pradesh. On 2 May, 2024, Shobran Yadav, 56, and his son Sushil Yadav, 28, died from suffocation while cleaning a sewer line in Lucknow’s Wazirganj area. In another incident on 3 May 2024, two workers Nooni Mandal, 36 and Kokan Mandal aka Tapan Mandal, 40 were killed while cleaning the septic tank in a house in Noida, Sector 26. The two workers were residents of Malda district of West Bengal and lived in the slum area of Noida Sector 9. 

India 'not keen' on legally binding global treaty to reduce plastic production

By Rajiv Shah  Even as offering lip-service to the United Nations Environment Agency (UNEA) for the need to curb plastic production, the Government of India appears reluctant in reducing the production of plastic. A senior participant at the UNEP’s fourth session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC-4), which took place in Ottawa in April last week, told a plastics pollution seminar that India, along with China and Russia, did not want any legally binding agreement for curbing plastic pollution.

Mired in controversy, India's polio jab programme 'led to suffering, misery'

By Vratesh Srivastava*  Following the 1988 World Health Assembly declaration to eradicate polio by the year 2000, to which India was a signatory, India ran intensive pulse polio immunization campaigns since 1995. After 19 years, in 2014, polio was declared officially eradicated in India. India was formally acknowledged by WHO as being free of polio.