Gujarat Information Commission orders review of CID’s RTI exemption in cyber fraud cases

By A Representative

In a significant development, the Gujarat State Information Commission (SIC) has recommended that the state government review and amend the existing RTI exemption granted to the CID (Crime) in cyber fraud cases.

The decision came in response to a complaint filed by Rakeshkumar Prajapati, a cyber fraud victim who lost ₹4.5 lakh from his Axis Bank account. After filing a complaint with the Cyber Crime Cell (under CID Crime), he sought copies of the FIR and investigation documents under the Right to Information Act, 2005. The CID refused to provide the information, citing its exemption under Section 24 of the RTI Act, based on a 2005 state government notification.

State Information Commissioner Nikhil Bhatt, in his order, stated that while CID handles sensitive investigations and is rightly exempted in such cases, the same cannot be applied to routine cyber fraud matters. "Misusing this exemption to withhold cyber fraud investigation details is unacceptable," the order noted. "The 'security exemption' clause cannot shield agencies from basic accountability in routine cyber-crimes."

The order emphasized that victims of cyber fraud are entitled to know the status of their complaints. “Every day, citizens defrauded online anxiously await updates. Under RTI, they have the right to know what action has been taken to recover their funds,” the Commission observed.

Using its powers under Section 25(3)(g) of the RTI Act, the Commission recommended that the state government amend the 2005 notification to explicitly exclude cyber fraud cases from the purview of the CID’s RTI exemption. It also suggested similar changes for Local Crime Branches (LCBs) and other units covered under the same notification.

The Commission has directed the CID to provide the requested information to the appellant within five days of the notification being amended.

The order is expected to benefit many cyber fraud victims in Gujarat who have faced difficulties accessing information about their cases.

If Maoist violence is illegitimate, how is Hindutva, state violence justified? Can right-wing wash off its sins?

By Swami Agnivesh* and Sandeep Pandey** There was major police action against Sudha Bhardwaj, Gautam Navlakha, Varvara Rao, Vernon Gonsalves and Arun Ferreira on 28 August, 2018. Before this police arrested Professor Shoma Sen, Adocate Sudhir Gadling, Sudhir Dhawle, Mahesh Raut and Rona Wilson on 6 June. Even before this Dr. Binayak Sen, Soni Sori, Ajay TG, Professor GN Saibaba and Prashant Rahi have been arrested and all these activists have been accused of having links with Maoists.

Rani Laxmi Bai, Tatya Tope 'martyred' by East India Company, Scindia's forefathers

Jiyaji Rao Scindia By A Representative In an email alert to Counterview, well-known political scientist Shamsul Islam has said that was “shameful for any political party in democratic India to keep children of Sindhias in their flock” given their role during the First War of Indian Independence (1857). In a direct commentary on Madhya Pradesh Congress leader Jyotiraditya Scindia moving over to BJP, Prof Islam has quote from a British gazetteer to prove his point.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”

Counterview

Search This Blog