Skip to main content

Nuclear expansion too late, too costly, warns energy expert Shankar Sharma

By A Representative 
As momentum appears to be building globally for nuclear energy, an Indian energy expert has issued a cautionary statement, warning that new nuclear power projects are not only outdated but also economically and strategically unviable—especially in the context of the climate crisis.
Referring to a recent article in The Guardian titled “Tide is turning in Europe and beyond in favour of nuclear power” (June 1, 2025), Shankar Sharma, a Karnataka-based power and climate policy analyst, pointed to what he describes as the “relentless push” by nuclear energy advocates to repackage an obsolete technology with fresh marketing. However, Sharma argues, compelling counter-evidence from around the world undermines their claims.
In particular, he cited another Guardian piece, “New nuclear would be too late and too costly” (June 5, 2025), which outlines the reasons why nuclear energy is increasingly seen as a dead end in the global energy transition. “The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has made it clear that renewables are now 10 times more efficient than new nuclear at mitigating CO₂ emissions,” Sharma emphasized. “In 2024, 92.5% of all new power capacity added globally came from renewables. New nuclear was virtually absent.”
Sharma underscored that the nuclear industry continues to rely on reactor models developed decades ago. “Large reactors being promoted today are essentially the same designs that were being pitched 25 years ago. No fundamentally new models have emerged in this century. And the so-called small modular reactors remain on the drawing board, with all forecasts for their deployment being highly speculative,” he said.
Apart from efficiency and cost, Sharma pointed to the unresolved issues of nuclear waste management, proliferation risks, and the contentious siting of plants, which continue to be major roadblocks for nuclear expansion.
“It should not be difficult to endorse these hard facts, based on numerous independent reports published in recent months,” Sharma said, urging Indian policymakers to take a more informed and transparent approach in the country’s energy planning.
“The critical question is whether our policymakers in India can be seen as rational and honest enough to take into account all such relevant factors in their decision-making process,” Sharma said.
With India continuing to entertain new nuclear ventures as part of its energy portfolio, Sharma’s statement poses a direct challenge to the government's long-term strategy, raising questions about whether the country is investing in a technology of the past while the rest of the world accelerates toward a renewable future.

Comments

TRENDING

Tibetan activist’s self-immolation sparks fresh concerns over cultural rights

By Kumar Krishnan*  The question of Tibet has once again entered international discourse, raising difficult questions about human rights, religious freedom, cultural identity, language, and the relationship between political power and the rights of indigenous communities. On 20 August 2026, the Kashag and the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile jointly organised a solidarity prayer service and peace march to mark the 49th day since the death of Lobga Rangzen, a Tibetan activist who died after self-immolating on 2 July in front of the United Nations Headquarters in New York.

IMF's policies 'stabilise' external creditors' balance sheets, 'generate' crisis in Africa

By Grieve Chelwa, Vijay Prashad   Across Africa, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) presents itself as the custodian of macroeconomic stability. Its latest Article IV staff reports on Ethiopia . Malawi , Nigeria , South Africa , and Zambia are written for economies with very different histories and institutions. Yet they converge on a familiar prescription: fiscal consolidation, tighter monetary policy, market-determined exchange rates, subsidy reform, deregulation and ‘private-sector-led growth’. No serious economist can dismiss macroeconomic stability.

Vande Mataram and the politics of distraction: When patriotism replaces performance

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan   There is an old saying: “Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.” Samuel Johnson was not criticising love for one’s country; he was warning against those who weaponise patriotic symbolism to escape accountability. In India today, that warning feels uncomfortably relevant.