Legal collective urges revocation of ban on Adivasi group in Chhattisgarh

By A Representative
A group of 100 lawyers and legal professionals from across India has issued a powerful appeal to the President of India, the Governor of Chhattisgarh, and the Chief Minister, demanding the immediate revocation of the ban on Moolvasi Bachao Manch (MBM), a grassroots Adivasi rights group. The appeal also calls for the release of all its jailed members and the repeal of the Chhattisgarh Special Public Security Act, 2005 (CSPSA), which the collective terms “draconian” and unconstitutional.
The appeal, issued by the National Alliance for Justice, Accountability and Rights (NAJAR), denounces the October 2024 declaration of MBM as an “unlawful organization” under the CSPSA. According to NAJAR, this ban is an attack on the right to freedom of association and reflects an alarming trend of criminalizing peaceful, constitutionally protected activities by Adivasi communities in Scheduled Areas.
The legal professionals’ concerns stem from the May 3, 2025 re-arrest of MBM members Suneeta Pottam and Dasru Podiyam by the National Investigation Agency (NIA), despite their prior judicial custody in unrelated cases. Both were remanded to five days of interrogation under a 2023 UAPA case before being returned to custody. This same case had earlier led to the arrest of MBM’s former president, Raghu Midiyami, and implicated members Gajendra Madavi and Laxman Kunjam.
NAJAR asserts that these arrests are part of a concerted strategy to incarcerate individuals merely for their past association with MBM, which had dissolved after the ban. MBM was founded in 2021 in the wake of the Silger firing—when security forces killed four Adivasis protesting the construction of paramilitary camps. From its inception, MBM operated openly, using petitions, public meetings, padyatras, and sit-ins to advocate for forest and land rights, Gram Sabha consent, and justice for state violence, relying on constitutional frameworks like PESA, FRA, and the Fifth Schedule.
The lawyers contend that at least 30 MBM members have been arrested in false cases. The first enforcement of the ban reportedly occurred in November 2024, when two members were detained simply for organizing a village meeting—without any allegations of incitement or violence. Even after MBM’s dissolution, its former members continue to face harassment and arrest, based only on their prior association.
The appeal highlights the case of Suneeta Pottam, a prominent activist who has been active in campaigns against displacement and militarization in Bastar. She has worked with organizations like Women Against Sexual Violence and State Repression (WSS) and the People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), and was acquitted in 9 out of 12 previous cases. Her release was reportedly obstructed by a new arrest under the UAPA. Dasru Podiyam, a young organizer from Bijapur, faces a similar fate, leading to fears that former MBM members are being deliberately targeted through prolonged legal harassment.
According to NAJAR, this crackdown coincides with increasing public outrage over custodial torture, extrajudicial killings, and rampant militarization in Bastar. They argue that the ban is being used to shield these actions from scrutiny by delegitimizing Adivasi dissent as anti-national.
The government’s rationale for the ban—alleging MBM was instigating people against “development works”—was strongly refuted. The signatories argue that MBM’s resistance to road and security camp construction was grounded in legally recognized rights under the Constitution, PESA, and FRA, which require prior Gram Sabha consent for development projects in Scheduled Areas. They point out that adivasi communities, who have traditionally protected forests, are now being dispossessed in the name of development, violating human rights and contributing to ecological damage.
The lawyers emphasized that the CSPSA allows the state to outlaw organizations without requiring any proof of violent activity, lacks judicial oversight, and criminalizes mere association—making it incompatible with constitutional democracy.
Among the prominent signatories to the letter are Senior Advocate Gayatri Singh (Bombay High Court), Advocate Indira Unninayar (Supreme Court and Delhi High Court), Advocate Purbayan Chakraborty (West Bengal), Advocate Mini Mathew (Mumbai/Goa), Advocate Ritesh Dhar Dubey (New Delhi), Advocate Afsar Jahan (Telangana High Court), Advocate Vertika Mani (New Delhi), Advocate Rohin Bhatt (Delhi), and Advocate Dr. Shalu Nigam (Delhi NCR)
The letter concludes with five demands to the authorities: revoke the ban on MBM, release all its imprisoned members, repeal the CSPSA, stop the criminalization of Adivasi protests, and end all surveillance and harassment of former MBM members.
Calling this a test of constitutional fidelity, the signatories urged immediate action to restore the rule of law and protect the democratic rights of Adivasi communities in Bastar and across India’s Scheduled Areas.

Comments

Grueling summer ahead: Cuttack’s alarming health trends and what they mean for Odisha

By Sudhansu R Das The preparation to face the summer should begin early in Odisha. People in the state endure long, grueling summer months starting from mid-February and extending until the end of October. This prolonged heat adversely affects productivity, causes deaths and diseases, and impacts agriculture, tourism and the unorganized sector. The social, economic and cultural life of the state remains severely disrupted during the peak heat months.

Stronger India–Russia partnership highlights a missed energy breakthrough

By N.S. Venkataraman* The recent visit of Russian President Vladimir Putin to India was widely publicized across several countries and has attracted significant global attention. The warmth with which Mr. Putin was received by Prime Minister Narendra Modi was particularly noted, prompting policy planners worldwide to examine the implications of this cordial relationship for the global economy and political climate. India–Russia relations have stood on a strong foundation for decades and have consistently withstood geopolitical shifts. This is in marked contrast to India’s ties with the United States, which have experienced fluctuations under different U.S. administrations.

From natural farming to fair prices: Young entrepreneurs show a new path

By Bharat Dogra There have been frequent debates on agro-business companies not showing adequate concern for the livelihoods of small farmers. Farmers’ unions have often protested—generally with good reason—that while they do not receive fair returns despite high risks and hard work, corporate interests that merely process the crops produced by farmers earn disproportionately high profits. Hence, there is a growing demand for alternative models of agro-business development that demonstrate genuine commitment to protecting farmer livelihoods.

The Vande Mataram debate and the politics of manufactured controversy

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* The recent Vande Mataram debate in Parliament was never meant to foster genuine dialogue. Each political party spoke past the other, addressing its own constituency, ensuring that clips went viral rather than contributing to meaningful deliberation. The objective was clear: to construct a Hindutva narrative ahead of the Bengal elections. Predictably, the Lok Sabha will likely expunge the opposition’s “controversial” remarks while retaining blatant inaccuracies voiced by ministers and ruling-party members. The BJP has mastered the art of inserting distortions into parliamentary records to provide them with a veneer of historical legitimacy.

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor* This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

The cost of being Indian: How inequality and market logic redefine rights

By Vikas Gupta We, the people of India, are engaged in a daily tryst—read: struggle—for basic human rights. For the seemingly well-to-do, the wish list includes constant water supply, clean air, safe roads, punctual public transportation, and crime-free neighbourhoods. For those further down the ladder, the struggle is starker: food that fills the stomach, water that doesn’t sicken, medicines that don’t kill, houses that don’t flood, habitats at safe distances from polluted streams or garbage piles, and exploitation-free environments in the public institutions they are compelled to navigate.

Why India must urgently strengthen its policies for an ageing population

By Bharat Dogra A quiet but far-reaching demographic transformation is reshaping much of the world. As life expectancy rises and birth rates fall, societies are witnessing a rapid increase in the proportion of older people. This shift has profound implications for public policy, and the need to strengthen frameworks for healthy and secure ageing has never been more urgent. India is among the countries where these pressures will intensify most sharply in the coming decades.

Thota Sitaramaiah: An internal pillar of an underground organisation

By Harsh Thakor* Thota Sitaramaiah was regarded within his circles as an example of the many individuals whose work in various underground movements remained largely unknown to the wider public. While some leaders become visible through organisational roles or media attention, many others contribute quietly, without public recognition. Sitaramaiah was considered one such figure. He passed away on December 8, 2025, at the age of 65.

New RTI draft rules inspired by citizen-unfriendly, overtly bureaucratic approach

By Venkatesh Nayak* The Department of Personnel and Training , Government of India has invited comments on a new set of Draft Rules (available in English only) to implement The Right to Information Act, 2005 . The RTI Rules were last amended in 2012 after a long period of consultation with various stakeholders. The Government’s move to put the draft RTI Rules out for people’s comments and suggestions for change is a welcome continuation of the tradition of public consultation. Positive aspects of the Draft RTI Rules While 60-65% of the Draft RTI Rules repeat the content of the 2012 RTI Rules, some new aspects deserve appreciation as they clarify the manner of implementation of key provisions of the RTI Act. These are: Provisions for dealing with non-compliance of the orders and directives of the Central Information Commission (CIC) by public authorities- this was missing in the 2012 RTI Rules. Non-compliance is increasingly becoming a major problem- two of my non-compliance cases are...

Search This Blog