Skip to main content

Modi's hidden emergency? Gujarat journalists under siege, face attacks, state suppression

By Dilip Patel* 
As India marked another anniversary on June 25 of the Emergency imposed by Indira Gandhi in 1975, it is important to reflect not only on that dark chapter of Indian democracy but also on the subtler, more insidious forms of repression that journalists face today. Much has been said about the press censorship and human rights violations during the Emergency, but what we are witnessing now in Gujarat is a hidden emergency—one that is not declared through official proclamations but felt on the ground by journalists who are being systematically silenced, harassed, and attacked. This undeclared emergency is more dangerous precisely because it wears the mask of democracy while undermining its very foundations.
As a journalist in Gujarat for decades, I have never seen such an aggressive and calculated campaign against the free press as what we have endured in the last ten years. Under Narendra Modi’s leadership, first as Chief Minister and now as Prime Minister, the state has evolved a toolkit of intimidation that includes physical violence, police harassment, economic strangulation, digital abuse, and legal vendettas. And this campaign is no longer covert—it is visible, brazen, and unapologetic.
Journalists who do not align with the ruling ideology or who dare to report on the ground realities are facing everything from arrests under draconian laws like the POCSO Act and sedition to online abuse from orchestrated troll armies. In one shocking case, Surat journalist Tushar Bamsara was booked under POCSO simply for reporting on a molestation case involving his own daughter. Despite the police initially refusing to file a complaint against the accused, they turned against the journalist once his report went viral. Rather than lauding his courage as a father and a reporter, the state sought to criminalize him.
This is not an isolated case. In Kutch, journalist Jayesh Shah was issued repeated notices by cybercrime police after exposing a police corruption racket. In Rajkot, Vadodara, Porbandar, Ahmedabad, and Botad, journalists have faced violent assaults. In several cases, the attackers have clear links to political or corporate power. Those investigating land scams, alcohol mafias, and local corruption have been beaten, threatened, or forced into silence.
Perhaps the most disturbing development is the use of economic pressure to dismantle independent media. Over 4,100 small and medium publications have shut down in Gujarat in recent years, not because of lack of readers, but because government advertisements—the lifeblood of local media—are selectively denied to any outlet that is even mildly critical of the ruling dispensation. This is financial censorship, a weaponized form of democracy where silence is purchased or punished.
Even established media houses have not been spared. Dainik Bhaskar faced income tax raids after exposing COVID-19 deaths and government underreporting. The Wire and NDTV have been relentlessly targeted. Independent journalists like Paranjoy Guha Thakurta, who dared to document the relationship between the Adani group and political power, face multiple court cases and arrest warrants. The message is clear: dissent will be crushed.
It is tragic that in the land of Mahatma Gandhi, where journalism was once a tool for national liberation, truth-tellers are now treated as enemies of the state. The state police, which should protect citizens, often act as enforcers for the ruling elite. False FIRs, legal loopholes, and procedural harassment are now routine tactics. Even digital journalists and YouTubers who operate independently face crackdowns, arrests, and cyberbullying.
The ruling establishment has ensured that no journalist is secure. Even when journalists are physically attacked, as in the case of Chirag Patel in Ahmedabad or Gopal Patel in Bapunagar, no serious action is taken. Many attacks remain unsolved, and in some cases, family members of journalists are dragged into legal trouble merely for association.
The press in Gujarat today lives in fear. We are being forced to choose between silence and survival. Those who dare to persist are labelled anti-national, corrupt, or worse. The digital media space, once a haven for independent voices, is now under constant surveillance and control. Even satire and investigative videos are taken down without explanation.
What we are seeing is not the spontaneous erosion of press freedom—it is its systematic demolition. The government has refused to pass a journalist protection law despite repeated pleas. In Maharashtra and eight other states, such laws exist. But in Gujarat, the state continues to operate with impunity, safe in the knowledge that there are no consequences.
I ask: if the press is the fourth pillar of democracy, why are its defenders being treated as criminals? Why is truth being punished and propaganda rewarded? If Gujarat is the laboratory of Hindutva, it is also becoming a laboratory for media suppression. How long can democracy survive without a free press?
This is not just a professional concern. It is a national emergency in slow motion. When corporate interests and political power align to destroy journalism, they destroy the people’s right to know. And when people can no longer trust the news, they can no longer trust democracy.
I write not out of fear but out of responsibility. The pen is still our only weapon. And as long as there are journalists willing to speak truth to power, all is not lost. But we must act—collectively, urgently, and fearlessly—before the silence becomes permanent.
---
*Senior journalist based in Ahmedabad. Detailed Gujarati version of this article was first published here 

Comments

TRENDING

Advocacy group decries 'hyper-centralization' as States’ share of health funds plummets

By A Representative   In a major pre-budget mobilization, the Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA), India’s leading public health advocacy network, has issued a sharp critique of the Union government’s health spending and demanded a doubling of the health budget for the upcoming 2026-27 fiscal year. 

Delhi Jal Board under fire as CAG finds 55% groundwater unfit for consumption

By A Representative   A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India audit report tabled in the Delhi Legislative Assembly on 7 January 2026 has revealed alarming lapses in the quality and safety of drinking water supplied by the Delhi Jal Board (DJB), raising serious public health concerns for residents of the capital. 

Zhou Enlai: The enigmatic premier who stabilized chaos—at what cost?

By Harsh Thakor*  Zhou Enlai (1898–1976) served as the first Premier of the People's Republic of China (PRC) from 1949 until his death and as Foreign Minister from 1949 to 1958. He played a central role in the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) for over five decades, contributing to its organization, military efforts, diplomacy, and governance. His tenure spanned key events including the Long March, World War II alliances, the founding of the PRC, the Korean War, and the Cultural Revolution. 

Stands 'exposed': Cavalier attitude towards rushed construction of Char Dham project

By Bharat Dogra*  The nation heaved a big sigh of relief when the 41 workers trapped in the under-construction Silkyara-Barkot tunnel (Uttarkashi district of Uttarakhand) were finally rescued on November 28 after a 17-day rescue effort. All those involved in the rescue effort deserve a big thanks of the entire country. The government deserves appreciation for providing all-round support.

Pairing not with law but with perpetrators: Pavlovian response to lynchings in India

By Vikash Narain Rai* Lynch-law owes its name to James Lynch, the legendary Warden of Galway, Ireland, who tried, condemned and executed his own son in 1493 for defrauding and killing strangers. But, today, what kind of a person will justify the lynching for any reason whatsoever? Will perhaps resemble the proverbial ‘wrong man to meet at wrong road at night!’

Jayanthi Natarajan "never stood by tribals' rights" in MNC Vedanta's move to mine Niyamigiri Hills in Odisha

By A Representative The Odisha Chapter of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity (CSD), which played a vital role in the struggle for the enactment of historic Forest Rights Act, 2006 has blamed former Union environment minister Jaynaynthi Natarjan for failing to play any vital role to defend the tribals' rights in the forest areas during her tenure under the former UPA government. Countering her recent statement that she rejected environmental clearance to Vendanta, the top UK-based NMC, despite tremendous pressure from her colleagues in Cabinet and huge criticism from industry, and the claim that her decision was “upheld by the Supreme Court”, the CSD said this is simply not true, and actually she "disrespected" FRA.

'Threat to farmers’ rights': New seeds Bill sparks fears of rising corporate control

By Bharat Dogra  As debate intensifies over a new seeds bill, groups working on farmers’ seed rights, seed sovereignty and rural self-reliance have raised serious concerns about the proposed legislation. To understand these anxieties, it is important to recognise a global trend: growing control of the seed sector by a handful of multinational companies. This trend risks extending corporate dominance across food and farming systems, jeopardising the livelihoods and rights of small farmers and raising serious ecological and health concerns. The pending bill must be assessed within this broader context.

Climate advocates face scrutiny as India expands coal dependence

By A Representative   The National Alliance for Climate and Environmental Justice (NACEJ) has strongly criticized what it described as coercive actions against climate activists Harjeet Singh and Sanjay Vashisht, following enforcement raids reportedly carried out on the basis of alleged violations of foreign exchange regulations and intelligence inputs. 

A balancing act? Global power rivalry over Iran challenges India’s foreign policy

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  A stable Iran is clearly in India’s interest. While US President Donald Trump has so far avoided a direct attack, the situation remains deeply uncertain. The central problem is that few governments take Trump’s words at face value. His actions have revealed a clear pattern: Washington targets adversaries even while pretending to negotiate with them.