Skip to main content

Global costs of contemporary imperialism: Strategic interests, armed conflicts, human toll of militarized geopolitics

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak
 
Imperialism, both historical and contemporary, continues to shape the global political and economic order through a complex web of military interventions, economic control mechanisms, and geopolitical influence. While empires may no longer be defined by territorial expansion in the traditional sense, many argue that the strategic deployment of military, economic, and diplomatic tools by powerful nations—particularly the United States and its European allies—serves similar functions: asserting dominance, accessing resources, and shaping political outcomes in other sovereign states.
Ongoing global conflicts are often viewed through this lens. According to the Geneva Academy's Rule of Law in Armed Conflicts (RULAC) initiative, there are currently 110 active armed conflicts around the world, with a significant concentration in the Middle East, Africa, and parts of Asia. The Council on Foreign Relations' Global Conflict Tracker identifies 32 major wars and conflicts. Many of these have deep-rooted geopolitical origins, where the involvement—direct or indirect—of powerful states is evident in the form of military interventions, arms transfers, or political support to factions.
The role of external powers in conflicts such as those in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, and more recently Ukraine and Palestine, has raised significant concerns. Critics argue that interventions purportedly aimed at democracy promotion or security have often resulted in widespread instability, displacement, and loss of life. Moreover, these conflicts frequently align with broader strategic or economic interests, such as access to resources or influence over regional politics.
Arms sales also provide a tangible link between global conflict and economic interests. The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) reports that between 2020 and 2024, the United States, France, Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom, and China were the world’s leading arms exporters. The United States alone saw a 21% rise in arms exports during this period, while France increased its exports by 11%. Meanwhile, arms imports were concentrated in Asia, the Middle East, and parts of Europe—regions with ongoing or potential conflicts.
The economic logic behind this trade is significant. The global arms industry is a major economic sector, employing millions and generating billions in revenue. This reality, critics argue, creates a structural incentive for the continuation of conflict, particularly when defense contractors hold substantial political influence in exporting countries.
The human cost of modern warfare is staggering. According to research from the Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs at Brown University, the post-9/11 conflicts in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Yemen, and Pakistan have resulted in nearly 940,000 direct deaths, including over 432,000 civilians. When indirect consequences—such as disease, displacement, and the breakdown of infrastructure—are accounted for, the death toll may exceed 4.5 million. In the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, more than 1.5 million people are estimated to have died. Since October 2023, over 65,000 Palestinians, including thousands of children, have reportedly been killed, alongside over 1,100 Israeli casualties. These numbers reflect not only the scale of human suffering but also the difficulty of achieving sustainable peace in a world of persistent militarization.
In addition to physical destruction, the social, environmental, and psychological impacts of war are often long-term and irreversible. Civilian populations bear the brunt of violence, while displacement, poverty, and the collapse of public services erode community resilience. Meanwhile, the environmental degradation associated with modern warfare—from the use of heavy artillery to the destruction of critical infrastructure—adds another layer of complexity to the global sustainability crisis.
Critics of contemporary imperialism argue that its scope extends beyond the battlefield. Economic policies, such as sanctions and trade tariffs, are increasingly employed as tools of geopolitical influence. For instance, under former U.S. President Donald Trump, a series of tariffs were unilaterally imposed on multiple countries, reshaping trade dynamics in ways that disproportionately affected working populations across the globe. While such measures are often justified in terms of national interest or security, they can have significant humanitarian consequences by increasing the cost of living and limiting access to essential goods.
Ultimately, the persistence of war, conflict, and economic coercion points to systemic issues in global governance and power distribution. The burden of these crises is disproportionately borne by ordinary people—workers, farmers, migrants—whose lives are often upended by decisions made far from their homes.
As debates about global security and justice continue, there is a growing call among scholars, activists, and policymakers for a more equitable international system—one that prioritizes peace, human dignity, and environmental sustainability over profit and power. For many, resisting militarism and imperialist logic is not merely a political position, but a necessary condition for ensuring the future of humanity and the planet.

Comments

TRENDING

10,000 students deprived of classes as Ahmedabad school remains shut: MCC writes to Gujarat CM

By A Representative   The Minority Coordination Committee (MCC) has written to Gujarat Chief Minister Bhupendra Patel, urging him to immediately reopen the Seventh Day Adventist School in Maninagar, Ahmedabad, where classes have been suspended for nearly two weeks. The MCC claims that the suspension, following a violent incident, violates the constitutional right to education of thousands of children.

Gujarat minority rights group seeks suspension of Botad police officials for brutal assault on minor

By A Representative   A human rights group, the Minority Coordination Committee (MCC) Gujarat,  has written to the Director General of Police (DGP), Gandhinagar, demanding the immediate suspension and criminal action against police personnel of Botad police station for allegedly brutally assaulting a minor boy from the Muslim community.

On Teachers’ Day, remembering Mother Teresa as the teacher of compassion

By Fr. Cedric Prakash SJ   It is Teachers’ Day once again! Significantly, the day also marks the Feast of St. Teresa of Calcutta (still lovingly called Mother Teresa). In 2012, the United Nations, as a fitting tribute to her, declared this day the International Day of Charity. A day pregnant with meaning—one that we must celebrate as meaningfully as possible.

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Targeted eviction of Bengali-speaking Muslims across Assam districts alleged

By A Representative   A delegation led by prominent academic and civil rights leader Sandeep Pandey  visited three districts in Assam—Goalpara, Dhubri, and Lakhimpur—between 2 and 4 September 2025 to meet families affected by recent demolitions and evictions. The delegation reported widespread displacement of Bengali-speaking Muslim communities, many of whom possess valid citizenship documents including Aadhaar, voter ID, ration cards, PAN cards, and NRC certification. 

Gandhiji quoted as saying his anti-untouchability view has little space for inter-dining with "lower" castes

By A Representative A senior activist close to Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA) leader Medha Patkar has defended top Booker prize winning novelist Arundhati Roy’s controversial utterance on Gandhiji that “his doctrine of nonviolence was based on an acceptance of the most brutal social hierarchy the world has ever known, the caste system.” Surprised at the police seeking video footage and transcript of Roy’s Mahatma Ayyankali memorial lecture at the Kerala University on July 17, Nandini K Oza in a recent blog quotes from available sources to “prove” that Gandhiji indeed believed in “removal of untouchability within the caste system.”

'Govts must walk the talk on gender equality, right to health, human rights to deliver SDGs by 2030'

By A Representative  With just 64 months left to deliver on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), global health and rights advocates have called upon governments to honour their commitments on gender equality and the human right to health. Speaking ahead of the 80th United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), experts warned that rising anti-rights and anti-gender pushes are threatening hard-won progress on SDG-3 (health and wellbeing) and SDG-5 (gender equality).

Is U.S. fast losing its financial and technological edge under Trump’s second tenure?

By Dr. Manoj Kumar Mishra*  The United States, along with its Western European allies, once promoted globalization as a democratic force that would deliver shared prosperity and balanced growth. That promise has unraveled. Globalization, instead of building an even world, has produced one defined by inequality, asymmetry of power, and new vulnerabilities. For decades, Washington successfully turned this system to its advantage. Today, however, under Trump’s second administration, America is attempting to exploit the weaknesses of others without acknowledging how exposed it has become itself.

What mainstream economists won’t tell you about Chinese modernisation

By Shiran Illanperuma  China’s modernisation has been one of the most remarkable processes of the 21st century and one that has sparked endless academic debate. Meng Jie (孟捷), a distinguished professor from the School of Marxism at Fudan University in Shanghai, has spent the better part of his career unpacking this process to better understand what has taken place.