Skip to main content

The forgotten fields: Reclaiming agriculture in the march of development

By Vikas Meshram 
No matter how advanced or complex the world becomes, food remains an unshakable necessity for human survival. Whether in technologically advanced nations or in developing countries striving to catch up, every individual depends on food. Yet, as the global narrative of development unfolds, agriculture—the source of this essential need—has been increasingly sidelined. This shift is not only alarming but also dangerous, as it threatens both human health and environmental balance.
Over the past four to five decades, global and national populations have soared, while cultivable land has steadily declined. The relentless expansion of infrastructure—railways, highways, industries, airports, urban housing, schools, and hospitals—has come at the cost of forests, ecosystems, and fertile farmland. As cities swell, the fields that once fed them shrink.
A 2024 Global Report on Food Crises reveals that approximately 295 million people worldwide are facing acute food insecurity, a number expected to balloon to 943 million by 2025. The UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) estimates the hidden annual cost of global agriculture at $12 trillion, much of it linked to unhealthy diets and ecological degradation.
India is no exception. The country ranked 105th out of 127 in the 2024 Global Hunger Index, with a score of 27.3—placing it in the “serious” category. This reflects not just a hunger crisis but a deeper systemic failure in our agricultural and food systems.
At the same time, the demand for food has grown in line with the population. In response, governments and farmers have been pushed to maximize yields—often by any means necessary. Since the 1970s, chemical fertilizers and pesticides have become the cornerstone of modern farming, heavily promoted and now virtually indispensable. So entrenched is their use that many farmers, even if willing, find it nearly impossible to transition away.
The result has been devastating. Chemical-heavy farming has stripped vital nutrients from food grains. Even as India produced 329.7 million tonnes of food grains in 2024—thanks largely to chemical inputs—the nutritional quality of that produce has deteriorated. India’s fertilizer market relies 85% on chemical products, with organic inputs making up just 15%. Urea is the most widely used, and since 2009–10, its use has risen by a third. Meanwhile, its cost has increased only 16.5% due to subsidies, deepening farmers’ dependence.
Farmers, accustomed to this system, continue with chemical-based agriculture because it promises short-term gains. Government warehouses overflow with grain. Minimum Support Prices (MSPs) have climbed. Subsidies cover seeds, fertilizers, pesticides, and other inputs. The government purchases a substantial share of produce annually, and below-poverty-line families receive subsidized food.
But this surface-level convenience masks a troubling contradiction.
As chemically-treated crops become the norm, public health is deteriorating. Diseases—both curable and chronic—are on the rise. The medical industry, research sector, and pharmaceutical companies may benefit, but society at large bears the cost in terms of weakened immunity and rising healthcare expenses. The development model, in its current form, traps us in a cycle of short-term fixes and long-term harm.
Even as we celebrate India’s emergence as the world’s fourth-largest economy, overtaking Japan with a GDP of $4 trillion and eyeing Germany’s spot by 2028, these milestones ring hollow if they rest on an unbalanced foundation—overreliance on imports, consumerism, and service industries. True development must be rooted in sustainability, with agriculture at its core.
Today, over 60% of India’s population still depends on agriculture for livelihood. Yet, despite subsidies and free food distribution, many find it impossible to continue farming. The projected growth of India’s food processing sector to $535 billion by 2025–26 further highlights the problem: while profits skyrocket, they accrue mostly to corporations, not farmers.
There is, however, hope on the horizon. India’s organic fertilizer market is expected to grow to $935 million by 2031. This signals a critical opportunity to shift toward natural farming. The government must prioritize this transition—redirecting subsidies from chemical to organic inputs, training farmers in traditional and sustainable methods, and supporting natural soil enrichment.
Key steps include:
- Promoting widespread soil testing and natural nutrient replenishment
- Supporting large-scale bio-fertilizer production
- Creating direct farmer-to-market links to cut out exploitative middlemen
In this time of climate stress, rising disease, and ecological collapse, India must return to its agrarian roots—not as a retreat, but as a visionary step forward. Sustainable agriculture is not a luxury; it is a necessity for meaningful progress. Only by re-centering farming in our development model can we build a truly resilient, healthy, and equitable society.

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative   Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

From Puri to the State: How Odisha turned the dream of drinkable tap water into policy

By Hans Harelimana Hirwa, Mansee Bal Bhargava   Drinking water directly from the tap is generally associated with developed countries where it is considered safe and potable. Only about 50 countries around the world offer drinkable tap water, with the majority located in Europe and North America, and a few in Asia and Oceania. Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Singapore have the highest-quality tap water, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Japan, the USA, Australia, the UK, Costa Rica, and Chile.

Michael Parenti: Scholar known for critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy

By Harsh Thakor*  Michael Parenti, an American political scientist, historian, and author known for his Marxist and anti-imperialist perspectives, died on January 24 at the age of 92. Over several decades, Parenti wrote and lectured extensively on issues of capitalism, imperialism, democracy, media, and U.S. foreign policy. His work consistently challenged dominant political and economic narratives, particularly those associated with Western liberal democracies and global capitalism.