Skip to main content

Honouring Birsa Munda requires resisting the loot of natural resources

By Raj Kumar Sinha* 
The legacy of Dharti Aaba Birsa Munda is inseparable from the struggle to protect indigenous land, identity, and rights. On June 9, as we commemorate Shaheed Diwas (Martyrs’ Day), it is imperative to reflect not only on his life but also on the ongoing injustices faced by tribal communities in the name of “development.”
During Birsa Munda’s time, the British colonial administration began dismantling traditional tribal agriculture and imposed a feudal system. As tribal methods of farming could not produce surplus, non-tribal cultivators were brought in to settle on tribal lands. This led to widespread land alienation. A new class of exploitative contractors emerged, disrupting agriculture and eroding tribal social structures.
Birsa Munda, a young boy from Ulihatu village in present-day Jharkhand, rose to lead a resistance at just 25. He mobilized his people not only against economic oppression but also cultural destruction. His movement, known as Ulgulan (The Great Tumult), forced the British to enact laws to protect tribal land rights. Birsa’s vision connected land ownership with cultural autonomy, asserting both economic rights and traditional values.
Today, however, tribal communities face an even greater threat.
Corporate Greed Targets Tribal Land
Most of India's major development projects are being implemented in Fifth Schedule areas—constitutionally designated tribal zones. These regions are rich in resources:
- 71% of the country's forests
- 92% of coal reserves
- 92% of bauxite
- 78% of iron ore
- 100% of uranium
- 85% of copper
- 65% of dolomite
- and 70% of water sources
These lands have always sustained tribal life and India's industries alike. But now, corporations—domestic and global—view them as assets to be seized. Displacement is accelerating, and no adequate solution has been implemented to rehabilitate the affected.
According to a 2016 report by the Ministry of Tribal Affairs, between 1950 and 1990 alone, 8.7 million tribals were displaced—making up 40% of all displaced people in that period. In the Narmada Valley alone, nearly a million people have been affected by proposed dams.
Adding to this crisis is the forced eviction from tiger reserves. Across 19 states, 84,808 families from 848 villages—mostly tribal—are to be relocated from the core zones of these reserves. Already, 25,007 families have been removed from 257 villages. On June 19, 2024, the National Tiger Conservation Authority issued directives for the urgent relocation of another 64,801 families from 591 villages.
This so-called development promises prosperity but delivers destruction. It begins by raising hopes and ends by compromising the very foundations of community life. It demands monopoly over shared resources, forcing tribal people to become refugees on their own land.
The False Promise of Development
In 1986, the UN declared that development is a human right. India is a signatory. Three conditions were laid down for just development:
1. Informed consent of the affected people
2. Equitable sharing of benefits
3. Protection of their livelihood resources
Again in 2007, the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples reaffirmed the tribal right to land and livelihood. But India has largely ignored these international commitments.
For thousands of years, tribal communities have preserved forests, rivers, hills, and biodiversity—not through coercion, but through tradition and way of life. They never claimed exclusive ownership. Yet now, in the era of corporate globalization, these same communities are being pushed out by the very forces that claim to be advancing the nation.
If Birsa Munda led his people against British colonialism, today's tribals face the corporate-colonial nexus. The challenge is no longer external empires, but internal exploitation masked as progress. The state, politicians, administrators, and middlemen are complicit in silencing dissent—through fear, bribery, or brute force.
Constitutional Responsibility and the Fifth Schedule
In light of these systemic violations, the Government of India—on the recommendations of the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes (14th Report, 2018–19)—issued instructions on April 29, 2022, reminding state governors of their constitutional duty under the Fifth Schedule.
Governors are empowered to examine all laws, regulations, and notifications applicable to Scheduled Areas, and to withhold or amend their implementation based on tribal welfare. Under Article 244 of the Constitution, any law meant for Scheduled Areas must first be evaluated by the Tribal Advisory Council. But these provisions remain largely symbolic.
As the late Dr. B.D. Sharma, a former Commissioner for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, rightly observed:
“The greatest tragedy for India’s tribals is that they won independence from British rule through sacrifice—but were again enslaved by post-colonial laws.”
This Martyrs’ Day, let us not reduce Birsa Munda to mere symbolism. To truly honour him, we must halt the plunder of tribal resources and restore the constitutional, legal, and moral commitments to indigenous communities.
Only then will Birsa Munda’s ulgulan echo meaningfully across this land.
---
*Bargi Dam Displaced and Affected Union, Jabalpur (Madhya Pradesh)

Comments

TRENDING

Modi’s Israel visit strengthened Pakistan’s hand in US–Iran truce: Ex-Indian diplomat

By Jag Jivan   M. K. Bhadrakumar , a career diplomat with three decades of service in postings across the former Soviet Union, Pakistan, Iran, Afghanistan, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Germany, and Turkey, has warned that the current truce in the US–Iran war is “fragile and ridden with contradictions.” Writing in his blog India Punchline , Bhadrakumar argues that while Pakistan has emerged as a surprising broker of dialogue, the durability of the ceasefire remains uncertain.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”

Why Indo-Pak relations have been on 'knife’s edge' , hostilities may remain for long

By Utkarsh Bajpai*  The past few decades have seen strides being made in all aspects of life – from sticks and stones to weaponry. The extreme case of this phenomenon has been nuclear weapons. The menace caused by nuclear weapons in the past is unforgettable. Images of Hiroshima and Nagasaki from 1945 come to mind, after the United States dropped two atomic bombs on the cities.

Manufacturing, services: India's low-skill, middle-skill labour remains underemployed

By Francis Kuriakose* The Indian economy was in a state of deceleration well before Covid-19 made its impact in early 2020. This can be inferred from the declining trends of four important macroeconomic variables that indicate the health of the economy in the last quarter of 2019.

Food security? Gujarat govt puts more than 5 lakh ration cards in the 'silent' category

By Pankti Jog* A new statistical report uploaded by the Gujarat government on the national food security portal shows that ensuring food security for the marginalized community is still not a priority of the state. The statistical report, uploaded on December 24, highlights many weaknesses in implementing the National Food Security Act (NFSA) in state.

The soundtrack of resistance: How 'Sada Sada Ya Nabi' is fueling the Iran war

​ By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  ​The Persian track “ Sada Sada Ya Nabi ye ” by Hossein Sotoodeh has taken the world by storm. This viral media has cut across linguistic barriers to achieve cult status, reaching over 10 million views. The electrifying music and passionate rendition by the Iranian singer have resonated across the globe, particularly as the high-intensity military conflict involving Iran entered its second month in March 2026.

Lata Mangeshkar, a Dalit from Devdasi family, 'refused to sing a song' about Ambedkar

By Pramod Ranjan*  An artist is known and respected for her art. But she is equally, or even more so known and respected for her social concerns. An artist's social concerns or in other words, her worldview, give a direction and purpose to her art. History remembers only such artists whose social concerns are deep, reasoned and of durable importance. Lata Mangeshkar (28 September 1929 – 6 February 2022) was a celebrated playback singer of the Hindi film industry. She was the uncrowned queen of Indian music for over seven decades. Her popularity was unmatched. Her songs were heard and admired not only in India but also in Pakistan, Bangladesh and many other South Asian countries. In this article, we will focus on her social concerns. Lata lived for 92 long years. Music ran in her blood. Her father also belonged to the world of music. Her two sisters, Asha Bhonsle and Usha Mangeshkar, are well-known singers. Lata might have been born in Indore but the blood of a famous Devdasi family...

'Batteries now cheap enough for solar to meet India's 90% demand': Expert quotes Ember study

By A Representative   Shankar Sharma, Power & Climate Policy Analyst, has urged India’s top policymakers to reconsider the financial and ecological implications of the country’s energy transition strategy in light of recent global developments. In a letter dated April 10, 2026, addressed to the Union Ministers of Finance, Power, New & Renewable Energy, Environment, Forest & Climate Change, and the Vice Chair of NITI Aayog, with a copy to the Prime Minister, Sharma highlighted concerns over India’s ambitious plans for coal gasification and the Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor (PFBR).

Health Day ads spark row as NAPi targets Britannia campaign, criticizes celebrity endorsement

By A Representative   The advocacy group Nutrition Advocacy in Public Interest (NAPi) has raised concerns over what it describes as misleading advertising of ultra-processed food products (UPFs), particularly those high in sugar, fat and salt, calling for stricter regulations and an end to such promotions across media platforms.