Skip to main content

Honouring Birsa Munda requires resisting the loot of natural resources

By Raj Kumar Sinha* 
The legacy of Dharti Aaba Birsa Munda is inseparable from the struggle to protect indigenous land, identity, and rights. On June 9, as we commemorate Shaheed Diwas (Martyrs’ Day), it is imperative to reflect not only on his life but also on the ongoing injustices faced by tribal communities in the name of “development.”
During Birsa Munda’s time, the British colonial administration began dismantling traditional tribal agriculture and imposed a feudal system. As tribal methods of farming could not produce surplus, non-tribal cultivators were brought in to settle on tribal lands. This led to widespread land alienation. A new class of exploitative contractors emerged, disrupting agriculture and eroding tribal social structures.
Birsa Munda, a young boy from Ulihatu village in present-day Jharkhand, rose to lead a resistance at just 25. He mobilized his people not only against economic oppression but also cultural destruction. His movement, known as Ulgulan (The Great Tumult), forced the British to enact laws to protect tribal land rights. Birsa’s vision connected land ownership with cultural autonomy, asserting both economic rights and traditional values.
Today, however, tribal communities face an even greater threat.
Corporate Greed Targets Tribal Land
Most of India's major development projects are being implemented in Fifth Schedule areas—constitutionally designated tribal zones. These regions are rich in resources:
- 71% of the country's forests
- 92% of coal reserves
- 92% of bauxite
- 78% of iron ore
- 100% of uranium
- 85% of copper
- 65% of dolomite
- and 70% of water sources
These lands have always sustained tribal life and India's industries alike. But now, corporations—domestic and global—view them as assets to be seized. Displacement is accelerating, and no adequate solution has been implemented to rehabilitate the affected.
According to a 2016 report by the Ministry of Tribal Affairs, between 1950 and 1990 alone, 8.7 million tribals were displaced—making up 40% of all displaced people in that period. In the Narmada Valley alone, nearly a million people have been affected by proposed dams.
Adding to this crisis is the forced eviction from tiger reserves. Across 19 states, 84,808 families from 848 villages—mostly tribal—are to be relocated from the core zones of these reserves. Already, 25,007 families have been removed from 257 villages. On June 19, 2024, the National Tiger Conservation Authority issued directives for the urgent relocation of another 64,801 families from 591 villages.
This so-called development promises prosperity but delivers destruction. It begins by raising hopes and ends by compromising the very foundations of community life. It demands monopoly over shared resources, forcing tribal people to become refugees on their own land.
The False Promise of Development
In 1986, the UN declared that development is a human right. India is a signatory. Three conditions were laid down for just development:
1. Informed consent of the affected people
2. Equitable sharing of benefits
3. Protection of their livelihood resources
Again in 2007, the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples reaffirmed the tribal right to land and livelihood. But India has largely ignored these international commitments.
For thousands of years, tribal communities have preserved forests, rivers, hills, and biodiversity—not through coercion, but through tradition and way of life. They never claimed exclusive ownership. Yet now, in the era of corporate globalization, these same communities are being pushed out by the very forces that claim to be advancing the nation.
If Birsa Munda led his people against British colonialism, today's tribals face the corporate-colonial nexus. The challenge is no longer external empires, but internal exploitation masked as progress. The state, politicians, administrators, and middlemen are complicit in silencing dissent—through fear, bribery, or brute force.
Constitutional Responsibility and the Fifth Schedule
In light of these systemic violations, the Government of India—on the recommendations of the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes (14th Report, 2018–19)—issued instructions on April 29, 2022, reminding state governors of their constitutional duty under the Fifth Schedule.
Governors are empowered to examine all laws, regulations, and notifications applicable to Scheduled Areas, and to withhold or amend their implementation based on tribal welfare. Under Article 244 of the Constitution, any law meant for Scheduled Areas must first be evaluated by the Tribal Advisory Council. But these provisions remain largely symbolic.
As the late Dr. B.D. Sharma, a former Commissioner for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, rightly observed:
“The greatest tragedy for India’s tribals is that they won independence from British rule through sacrifice—but were again enslaved by post-colonial laws.”
This Martyrs’ Day, let us not reduce Birsa Munda to mere symbolism. To truly honour him, we must halt the plunder of tribal resources and restore the constitutional, legal, and moral commitments to indigenous communities.
Only then will Birsa Munda’s ulgulan echo meaningfully across this land.
---
*Bargi Dam Displaced and Affected Union, Jabalpur (Madhya Pradesh)

Comments

TRENDING

Nepal votes amid regional rivalry: Why New Delhi is watching closely

By Nava Thakuria*  As Nepal holds an early national election on Thursday (5 March 2026), the people of northeast India, along with other regional observers, are watching the proceedings closely. The vote was necessitated after the government of Prime Minister Khadga Prasad Sharma Oli collapsed in September 2025 following widespread anti-government protests. The election will determine the composition of the 275-member House of Representatives, originally scheduled for 2027, under the stewardship of an interim government led by former Supreme Court justice Sushila Karki.

'Policy long overdue': Coalition of 29 experts tells JP Nadda to act on SC warning label order

By A Representative   In a significant development for public health, the Supreme Court of India has directed the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) to seriously consider implementing mandatory front-of-pack warning labels on pre-packaged food products. The order, passed by a bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K.V. Viswanathan on February 10, 2026, comes as the Court expressed dissatisfaction with the regulatory body's progress on the issue.

Vaccination vs screening: Policy questions raised on cervical cancer strategy

By A Representative   A public policy expert has written to Union Health Minister J. P. Nadda raising a series of concerns regarding the national Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination campaign launched on February 28 for 14-year-old girls.

From plagiarism to proxy exams: Galgotias and systemic failure in education

By Sandeep Pandey*   Shock is being expressed at Galgotias University being found presenting a Chinese-made robotic dog and a South Korean-made soccer-playing drone as its own creations at the recently held India AI Impact Summit 2026, a global event in New Delhi. Earlier, a UGC-listed journal had published a paper from the university titled “Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis,” which became the subject of widespread ridicule. Following the robotic dog controversy coming to light, the university has withdrawn the paper. These incidents are symptoms of deeper problems afflicting the Indian education system in general. Galgotias merely bit off more than it could chew.

Development vs community: New coal politics and old conflicts in Madhya Pradesh

By Deepmala Patel*  The Singrauli region of Madhya Pradesh, often described as “India’s energy capital,” has for decades been a hub of coal mining and thermal power generation. Today, the Dhirouli coal mine project in this district has triggered widespread protests among local communities. In recent years, the project has generated intense controversy, public opposition, and significant legal and social questions. This is not merely a dispute over one mine; it raises a larger question—who pays the price for energy development? Large corporate beneficiaries or the survival of local communities?

The new anti-national certificate: If Arundhati Roy is the benchmark, count me in

By Dr. Mansee Bal Bhargava*   Dear MANIT Alumni Network Committee, “Are you anti-national?” I encountered this fascinating—some may say intimidating—question from an elderly woman I barely know, an alumna of Maulana Azad College of Technology (MACT, now Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology - MANIT), Bhopal, and apparently one of the founders of the MACT (now MANIT) Alumni Network. The authority with which she posed the question was striking. “How much anti-national are you? What have you done for the Alumni Network Committee to identify you as anti-national?” When I asked what “anti-national” meant to her and who was busy certifying me as such, the response came in counter-questions.

Minority concerns mount: RTI reveals govt funded Delhi religious meet in December

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  Indian Muslims have expressed deep concern over what they describe as rising hate speech and hostility against their community under the BJP-led government in India. A recent flashpoint was the event organised by Sanatan Sanstha titled “Sanatan Rashtra Shankhnad Mahotsav” in New Delhi on 13–14 December 2025.

From neglect to progress: The story of Ranavara’s community-led development

By Bharat Dogra   Visitors to Ranavara, a remote village in Kherwara block of Udaipur district, are often surprised by its multi-dimensional progress. The village today is known for its impressive school building, regenerated pastures, expanded tree cover, and extensive water conservation and supply works. These achievements are the outcome of sustained community efforts over several years, demonstrating how small, consistent initiatives can lead to significant change.

The ultimate all-time ODI XI: A personal selection of icons across eras

By Harsh Thakor* This is my all-time best XI chosen for ODI (One Day International) cricket:  1. Adam Gilchrist (W) – The absolute master blaster who could create the impact of exploding gunpowder with his electrifying strokeplay. No batsman was more intimidating in his era. Often his knocks decided the fate of games as though the result were premeditated. He escalated batting strike rates to surreal realms.