NAJAR seeks urgent intervention over Karnataka police shootings, discrimination against migrant workers

By A Representative

The National Alliance for Justice, Accountability and Rights (NAJAR), a collective of legal professionals affiliated with the National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM), has raised serious concerns regarding recent incidents in Karnataka involving alleged extrajudicial police killings and discriminatory treatment of migrant workers. In two detailed letters addressed to the Chief Minister of Karnataka and the Chairman of the State Police Complaints Authority, NAJAR has demanded urgent action to uphold constitutional rights, ensure police accountability, and protect the dignity of vulnerable populations.

Referring to the case of the sexual assault and murder of a five-year-old girl in Hubli on April 13, 2025, NAJAR unequivocally condemned the crime and called for justice through due legal process. However, they raised alarm over the killing of Ritesh Kumar, a migrant worker from Bihar who was apprehended as the accused and later shot dead by police in what was described as an “encounter”. The organization highlighted that the incident is under scrutiny before the Karnataka High Court and cautioned against any narrative that could justify such killings without judicial oversight.

NAJAR criticized the public statements made by senior government officials, including the Home Minister and Labour Minister, for promoting a hostile atmosphere against migrant workers following the incident. According to the group, such rhetoric, which calls for regulation of interstate labour migration and background checks of migrant workers, is unconstitutional and dangerously stokes public prejudice. “When businesses and investors are welcomed into the state, why can’t the same be extended to toiling workers with dignity?” the letter asked. NAJAR emphasized that the blanket targeting of migrant workers, who contribute significantly to the state’s economy, undermines the fundamental rights enshrined in Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution.

In a separate letter to the State Police Complaints Authority, NAJAR documented what it called “a disturbing pattern” of excessive police force used in Hubballi-Dharwad. Citing fourteen specific cases between May 2024 and April 2025—many resulting in serious injuries and one in death—the organization questioned the legality and necessity of these actions. All incidents followed a similar script: police claimed self-defence while the accused were shot, often in the legs, during or immediately after alleged criminal activity. NAJAR noted that in each case, the police appear to be the sole witnesses, raising serious doubts about the impartiality and verifiability of their claims.

NAJAR invoked Supreme Court guidelines in PUCL v. State of Maharashtra and Arif Md. Yeasin Jwadder v. State of Assam, which require FIR registration, magisterial inquiries, and independent investigations in cases of police encounters or custodial violence. The letters demanded public disclosure of all such incidents on official platforms, registration of FIRs against police officials involved, and strict compliance with legal procedures to ensure accountability. The group also stressed that failure to hold police officers accountable not only violates constitutional rights but also sets a dangerous precedent for unchecked state violence.

The letters concluded with an appeal to the Karnataka government to disassociate itself from prejudicial public statements, initiate necessary inquiries into the police conduct, and adopt proactive measures to make migrant workers feel safe and respected in the state. NAJAR called for firm steps to restore trust, uphold constitutional values, and prevent further erosion of rights and liberties in Karnataka.

Comments

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman* In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

From Puri to the State: How Odisha turned the dream of drinkable tap water into policy

By Hans Harelimana Hirwa, Mansee Bal Bhargava Drinking water directly from the tap is generally associated with developed countries where it is considered safe and potable. Only about 50 countries around the world offer drinkable tap water, with the majority located in Europe and North America, and a few in Asia and Oceania. Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Singapore have the highest-quality tap water, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Japan, the USA, Australia, the UK, Costa Rica, and Chile.

Michael Parenti: Scholar known for critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy

By Harsh Thakor* Michael Parenti, an American political scientist, historian, and author known for his Marxist and anti-imperialist perspectives, died on January 24 at the age of 92. Over several decades, Parenti wrote and lectured extensively on issues of capitalism, imperialism, democracy, media, and U.S. foreign policy. His work consistently challenged dominant political and economic narratives, particularly those associated with Western liberal democracies and global capitalism.

Search This Blog