Governing elites manipulate minds with rhetoric of nationalism, religion, patriotism for wars

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak

War is an easily available strategic tool used by both ruling and non-ruling elites to subjugate the masses—not only by inciting them to kill one another indiscriminately, but also by eroding reason itself through the militarisation of the mind. Scientific and technological advancements have made it easy to kill in seconds. It is increasingly difficult to distinguish modern theatres of war from war-themed video games. In the modern slaughterhouse of war, all that is required is the ability to press a button—to annihilate hundreds, thousands, even millions of people in an instant. Such suicidal missions, carried out by professional killing machines for the governing elites, are not acts of bravery but the result of manipulated minds—conditioned by the rhetoric of nationalism, religion, and patriotism.

After the wars, when the guns fall silent in the trenches, the submarines are sunbathing, and the skies are free of fighter jets—if only briefly before the next conflict—it is important to ask: who truly benefits from these wars? There are clear winners in war, but they are not the brave generals or idealistic soldiers who fight on the front lines. The true beneficiaries are the governing elites and their corporate cronies—especially those who manufacture weapons—who profit immensely without ever setting foot on the battlefield. These elites perpetuate hegemonic, imperialist political cultures that breed wars and conflicts, all in service of protecting the interests of the capitalist class.

Imperialist, capitalist, chauvinistic, cultural and religious wars do not liberate people from hunger and homelessness. These wars do not end gender inequality, or the class, caste, and race-based exploitation. They do not free people from ignorance, blind beliefs, or illiteracy. In fact, imperialist, capitalist, chauvinistic, and religious wars serve to reinforce all forms of discrimination, inequality, exploitation, and ignorance. Wars destroy scientific consciousness by militarising the minds of the masses. As a project, war is antithetical to the idea of human liberation from the conditions of slavery. Wars not only marginalise the masses but also strengthen all forms of reactionary forces that continue to domesticate the people, forcing them to serve the governing classes.

Death and destitution are the twin outcomes of war, whereas liberation struggles empower the masses with revolutionary and scientific consciousness to ensure liberty, equality, and justice for all. Wars kill reason by subjecting the masses to shock therapies of fear, while liberation struggles enhance the creative abilities of the people. Wars destroy democracy, whereas liberation struggles create the conditions for deepening democracy and expanding egalitarian citizenship rights.

The history of wars and liberation struggles shows that wars are fought quickly, but liberation takes time to cultivate. It challenges the hegemony of the governing elites and empowers the people. Liberation empowers people to dismantle all conditions that breed inequality, exploitation, and slavery. Libération struggles promote peace, prosperity, and fraternity. They stimulate the growth of science, secularism, and solidarity between humanity and nature. Therefore, liberation takes time to develop and spread radical consciousness rooted in reason, organising people around a collective understanding of life to launch struggles for the emancipation of humankind from all forms of bondage that undermine human qualities, intelligence, and the social nature of human beings.

There is no bravery in death and destitution. Wars are barbaric and result in the pointless sacrifice of brave and idealistic youth. It is an act of cowardice to kill in the name of nationalistic wars. Human liberation from all forms of bourgeois wars and conflicts is central to creating a peaceful society that ensures the growth of the creative potential of all people, free from any form of discrimination, toward the development of an egalitarian society. Therefore, it is our responsibility to mobilise the masses against all forms of imperialist, capitalist, chauvinistic, and religious wars to secure world peace and a brighter future for our youth. Our collective future depends on an indefinite, uninterrupted, and invincible struggle for world peace.

Comments

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

By Rajiv Shah This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan* “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Asbestos contamination in children’s products highlights global oversight gaps

By A Representative A commentary published by the International Ban Asbestos Secretariat (IBAS) has drawn attention to the challenges governments face in responding effectively to global public-health risks. In an article written by Laurie Kazan-Allen and published on March 5, 2026, the author examines how the discovery of asbestos contamination in children’s play products has raised questions about regulatory oversight and international product safety. The article opens by reflecting on lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that governments in several countries were slow to respond to early warning signs of the crisis. Referring to the experience of the United Kingdom, the author writes that delays in implementing protective measures contributed to “232,112 recorded deaths and over a million people suffering from long Covid.” The commentary uses this example to illustrate what it describes as the dangers of underestimating emerging threats. Attention then turns...

India’s green energy push faces talent crunch amidst record growth at 16% CAGR

By Jag Jivan* A new study by a top consulting firm has found that India’s cleantech sector is entering a decisive growth phase, with strong policy backing, record capacity additions and surging investor interest, but facing mounting pressure on talent supply and rising compensation costs .

The kitchen as prison: A feminist elegy for domestic slavery

By Garima Srivastava* Kumar Ambuj stands as one of the most incisive voices in contemporary Hindi poetry. His work, stripped of ornamentation, speaks directly to the lived realities of India’s marginalized—women, the rural poor, and those crushed under invisible forms of violence. His celebrated poem “Women Who Cook” (Khānā Banātī Striyāṃ) is not merely about food preparation; it is a searing indictment of patriarchal domestic structures that reduce women’s existence to endless, unpaid labour.

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey* In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Beyond sattvik: Purity, caste and the politics of the Indian kitchen

By Rajiv Shah A few week ago, I was forwarded an article that appeared in the British weekly The Economist . Titled “Caste and cuisine: From honeycomb curry to blood fry: India’s ‘untouchable’ cooking”, it took me back to what I had blogged about what was called a “ sattvik food festival”, an annual event organised by former Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad professor Anil Gupta.

Search This Blog