Skip to main content

Govt of India's high GDP growth policy 'critically impacting' nature, communities

Counterview Desk 

Karnataka-based power and climate policy analyst Shankar Sharma, in a letter to Union finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman, has wondered if the finance ministry, the PMO and NITI Aayog have done a diligent analysis of the multiple impacts of such a relentless pursuit of the high GDP growth rate paradigm on our natural resources -- flora, fauna, wildlife, general environment, fresh water sources -- and the associated impacts on pollution/ contamination of air, and impact on community health across the country.
“In particular, are the ongoing policies of our government in line with the UN recommendations to triple the speed of the shift to renewable energy; moving investments and subsidies from fossil fuels to renewables; and adequately protecting forests and ecosystems as powerful climate solutions?”, he asks.

Text:

Please accept my hearty congratulations on your recent election as a member of Rajya Sabha from Karnataka. I wish the very best for the country in this term of yours.
May I also draw your kind attention to a statement attributed to you, as in this newslink, during 'Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav Iconic Week' of the Ministry of Finance, which was celebrated from June 6-12?
I assume that your statement also reflects the positive approach of the entire Union government and hence, it deserves the appreciation by all rationally thinking people. It should be a true characteristic of any democratically elected government that peoples' concerns are satisfactorily addressed regularly.
However, I may please be excused to state that I have never received even the courtesy of a simple acknowledgement to a number of representations/ 'right questions' from any of the Union Ministries under the present NDA government during the last 6-8 years.
My relevant representations/ 'right questions' were generally addressed to the ministries of: (a) Environment, Forest and Climate Change; (b) Power and NRE; (c) Coal; (d) Finance; (e) PMO; and of course to NITI Aayog. If you desire so, I can forward a copy of all my recent representations addressed to various ministries to you, so that satisfactory responses to them can be arranged through the initiative of your Ministry.
One such representation of interest to your ministry is as in an email of 2nd October 2019 addressed to Hon'ble PM and the members of the Union government. As can be surmised from the contents of that email, my concerns, and hence the associated questions, are all on various policies of the Union government which have been deleteriously impacting the critical elements of nature such as forests, fresh water bodies, fertility of soil etc., and the consequent social, economic and health issues for our people.
Specifically, my concerns have been with regard to the high GDP growth rate paradigm, which has been relentlessly pursued by successive governments since the 1990s. Some of my questions addressed to your ministry, and also to PMO, have been generally on the following lines:
  • Has the finance ministry, the PMO and NITI Aayog done a diligent analysis of the multiple impacts of such a relentless pursuit of the high GDP growth rate paradigm on our natural resources: flora, fauna, wildlife, general environment, fresh water sources; and the associated impacts on pollution/ contamination of air, water and soil; and on community health across the country? If so, what does the associated study state on the sustainability of such a policy paradigm in the present day Indian context?
  • Has the Union govt. and in particular, your ministry, taken true cognisance of the findings of a World Bank report of June 5, 2013 with the title “Diagnostic Assessment of Select Environmental Challenges, Economic Growth and Environmental Sustainability: What Are the Trade-offs?” in the case of India? This report had highlighted how the environment has suffered in India consequent to the previous decade of rapid economic growth. A subsequent joint study by the World Bank and University of Washington released in 2016 had estimated that in 2013 the environmental degradation costs to India, including welfare costs and lost labour income due to air pollution, was of about 8.5% of its economy.
  • Taking an objective view of this World Bank report, and other such reports (such as "The Economics of Climate Change: by Sir Nicholas Stern; “Prosperity without growth? - The transition to a sustainable economy” by the Sustainable Development Commission (SDC), UK Government; the report ‘The Limits to Growth by The Club of Rome, in 1972; the draft 'National Resource Efficiency Policy' (NREP), 2019 by MoEF&CC; various IPCC reports etc.) will the Union govt. continue to believe that a rapid economic growth based on a high GDP growth rate paradigm is in the best interest of our people, and that the associated deleterious impacts on critical elements of the environment, and on our communities are negligible and/or acceptable?
  • In the context of the global scenario of "Climate Emergency", as being highlighted by the UN (“Secretary-General Warns of Climate Emergency, Calling Intergovernmental Panel’s Report ‘a File of Shame’, While Saying Leaders ‘Are Lying’, Fuelling Flames”: ), is it the conviction of the Union government that the associated policies which will lead to continued rapid economic growth, even at enormous net economic cost to our society, will be consistent with the UN goal of effective climate action? In particular, are the ongoing policies of our government in line with the UN recommendations to triple the speed of the shift to renewable energy; moving investments and subsidies from fossil fuels to renewables; and adequately protecting forests and ecosystems as powerful climate solutions?
  • There have been scores of such associated concerns and 'right questions' in the minds of our people, most of which have been raised in my email representations, and in print and electronic media. If you desire so, I can list a number of such specific questions, which are in dire need of urgent clarification from the Union government.
  • Two such high level questions, which can effectively encompass most of such concerns are: (a) has the Union government prepared/ updated the National Action Plan on Climate Change as relevant to Year 2022, keeping in view the "Global Climate Emergency", and the climate related natural disasters which have been devastating our communities during the last few years?; (b) why the draft National Energy Policy of 2017, by NITI Aayog, which should have effectively considered the green energy pathway for the country and the associated policy interventions, not finalised yet?
A discussion paper with the title "High GDP growth rate-based economic paradigm in the context of true welfare of our communities", has raised many such 'right questions'.
In the context of all these issues, it will be a great service to the nation, if satisfactory clarification to all such 'right questions' of pan India nature can be obtained from the concerned ministries, and shared with the people of our country; through effective intervention by your ministry.
A frequently raised issue for the people of Karnataka with regard to the Rajya Sabha MPs elected from the state, specifically with regard to those MPs who are not the normal residents of the state, is the lack of easy access to such MPs.  Many of the burning problems of our people, which could be well addressed by the Union government, are not being effectively raised in the Parliament. 
 Whereas, Lok Sabha MPs of the state can be generally noticed as busy with only few localised issues relevant to their constituencies, it is a general expectation that Rajya Sabha MPs are well equipped to take up larger state level issues and many of the Pan India issues, with specific relevance to our state, effectively.
In this context, can the people of Karnataka hope that our concerns/ 'right questions' as discussed above, will be effectively responded to by your office, and that we can hope to get satisfactory clarifications/ actions needed? Can I also hope that your office will act as an effective channel for me to air our grievances of state/ national importance, and to get redressal of the same?

Comments

TRENDING

Unlike Soviet Union, Russia is no friend to India: Ukrainian scholar tells 'Indian friends'

Counterview Desk In an open letter to "dear Indian friends", Anastasia Piliavsky, born in Odessa, Ukraine, studied at Boston and Oxford Universities (on a Rhodes Scholarship), and now teaches at King’s College, London, has said that she faces "deep moral dilemma", personally and professionally, over the "astonishingly unified Indian response to the war in Ukraine." Based on her interaction with a "number of thoughtful and caring Indian friends", in this letter, she says, she is "reeling at the ubiquitous silence at, justifications of or outright support for Putin’s terror, which now prevails in India, at the ubiquitous #IStandWithPutin and #istandwithrussia hashtags." She insists, India must understand, "Unlike the Soviet Union, Russia is no friend to India. Soviet leaders, beginning with (the Ukrainian) Nikita Khrushchev – who declared hindi rusi bhai bhai – built up deep political and cultural exchange with India." Text : I

Teesta treaty? Modi sends ball to Mamata's court amidst Hasina's mango diplomacy

By Samina Akhter*  Most Bangladeshi and India media reports say that the West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has received 600 kg of mangoes from Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina as part of her "mango-hilsa diplomacy." Hasina also delivered mangoes to President Ram Nath Kovind and Prime Minister Narendra Modi this month, according to the Bangladesh Deputy High Commission in India. In all, 1,200 kg of Amrapali mangoes were delivered to the residences of the President and the Prime Minister of India. According to a Bangladesh's deputy high commission official in Kolkata, a few more chief ministers in the eastern region will likely receive similar gifts. Last year, not only President Kovind and Prime Minister Modi, but also the chief ministers of West Bengal, Tripura, and Assam also received mangoes from Prime Minister Hasina. Hasina delivered mangoes from Rajshahi, including kinds like Golapkhas and Amrapali, as it is the peak season for the delectable fruit in

Technocratic globalism, tyranny? Health Ministry warned: bill to 'enslave' Indians

Sandeep Pandey, Tushar Gandhi By Rosamma Thomas*  Union of Concerned Citizens, a group comprising Magsaysay Award winner Prof Sandeep Pandey, human rights activist Tushar Gandhi, former judge of the Bombay High Court BG Kolse Patil, pediatrician Dr Jacob Puliyel and several renowned Indian citizens have written to the Union Health Minister cautioning him against tabling the draft Public Health Bill in the Monsoon Session of Parliament. “The Public Health (Prevention, Control And Management Of Epidemics, Bio-Terrorism And Disasters) Bill, 2017 and a Prospective Bill of 2022 as discussed in news articles, is straightforwardly violative of Fundamental Rights of the citizens of India and therefore, Ultra Vires of the Indian Constitution. It contravenes several International Treaties and Conventions including the Nuremberg Treaty of 1947 which was enacted to ensure that no country would repeat such inhuman medical atrocities on fellow human beings”, the 12-page letter reads. “Strangely, t

Cops 'refuse to register' complaint after BSF shot landless worker off Bangla border

By Our Representative  Kirity Roy, secretary, Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha (MASUM), and national convener, Programme Against Custodial Torture & Impunity (PACTI), in a complaint to the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), referring to the incident of “firing and execution” of a poor Muslim youth, has alleged that the 26 year old was was shot at “without giving any warning” one and half kilometers inside the Indian territory from Bangladesh border by an on- duty Border Security Force (BSF) personnel. Stating that the person, Ruhul Mondal, belonged to an Other Backward Class (OBC), and hailed from Ramnarayan Para village under Sagarpara police station in Murshidabad district, West Bengal, Roy in his representation said, the BSF person who shot at him is “attached with Singpara Border Outpost, 141 Battalion”, underlining, the BSF has now floated “self defense theory” to cover up its operation. According to the BSF officials, the incident took place in the jute fields in

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Protesters demand release of Teesta Setalvad, Sreekumar, seek review of SC order

By Our Representative  Protests broke out across India on June 27 following Teesta Setalvad’s arrest demanding her immediate release. Sabrang India , a site run by Setalvad, claimed she was “arrested on trumped-up charges after the Supreme Court dismissed the petition moved by Zakia Jafri demanding an investigation into the larger conspiracy behind the 2002 Gujarat violence.” The protesters also demanded release of former DGP Gujarat police RB Sreekumar, also arrested simultaneously. The protests were preceded by over 2,200 people from across the globe signing a statement demanding their immediate release. Leading signatories such as People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) general secretary V Suresh, National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM) convenor Medha Patkar, former Naval chief Admiral Ramdas. “The state has used the observations made in the judgment to falsely and vindictively prosecute those who had struggled for justice even in the face of state callousness and complicit

Electoral bonds scheme 'compromises' voluntary nature PM relief fund donations

By Rosamma Thomas*  The Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund (PMNRF) is meant to collect voluntary donations from the general public, either individuals or organizations, to enable assistance to people in times of natural disaster, or for expensive medical treatment. That fundamental voluntary character of the fund, however, has changed in recent years.  The gazette notification of January 2018 announcing the Electoral Bond scheme states, in Clause 12 (2): “The amount of bonds not encashed within the validity period of fifteen days shall be deposited by the authorized bank to the Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund”. The Union government has, thus, through notification, directed funds to be deposited into what was meant to be purely voluntary. Commodore Lokesh Batra, who has been campaigning for transparency in government functioning, holds that once a gazette notification has been issued directing that funds be deposited into the PMNRF, the character of the whole fund has changed,

Bulldozing houses in UP: India isn't Israel, Muslims living here 'aren't Palestinians'

By Naveen Tewari, Sandeep Pandey*  A recent full front page of the advertisement by a Bhartiya Janata Party government declares, 'House is not just a word. It is a place where power to dream comes and aspirations are fulfilled. Home is much about dignity and security than it is about shelter.' It further goes on to quote Narendra Modi, 'It is my dream that every Indian has a pucca house by 2022.' The occasion was dedication of houses built by a private builder Balaji to the poor. Having witnessed over the past few days the now iconic picture of a bulldozer running down the Prayagraj house of parents of female Muslim student and activist Afreen Fatima, who participated in the anti-Citizenship Amendment Act and National Register of Citizens protests, one is almost tempted to look for a fine print at the bottom of the page to the effect that the promise of house is subject to the condition that one doesn't participate in any anti-government protest otherwis

Church in India: Rooted in patriarchy, Pope Francis-initiated reforms remain on paper

By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ*  It is ‘Laity Sunday’ once again on June 26! A time for the Church once again to introspect and to see whether the much flaunted ‘lay collaboration’ actually exists in reality or not! In a highly clerical and patriarchal Church, which has stubbornly refused to accept in toto the changes envisaged by Vatican II and as desired by the then Popes John XXIII and Paul VI, introducing any reforms is certainly very difficult. But Pope Francis, in his typical style, is apparently succeeding in doing so! On March 19, 2022 (Feast of St Joseph) the ninth anniversary of the formal inauguration of his pontificate, he published Praedicate Evangelium (Preach the Gospel),his new constitution for the restructuring of the Vatican Curia. It was a reform that was promised at the beginning of his pontificate; several aspects of it have already been implemented over the years. The final document, however, does make some significant changes and provides the vision of a Curia that

'Highly abnormal': AltNews journo's arrest suggests 'deterioration in media freedom'

By Bharat Dogra*  Leading media organizations have come out in strong support of recently arrested journalist Mohammed Zubair. These organizations include, among others, the Editors Guild of India, the Press Club of India, the Delhi Union of Journalists and DIGIPUB, a platform for several important digital media organizations. All these organizations have condemned the recent arrest of the noted journalist and demanded his immediate release. While leading human rights organizations and political parties have also made somewhat similar statements, the strong support of media organizations is particularly important as the effort of the authorities has been to try to present the arrested journalist as someone who has been indulging in irresponsible journalism.  In such a situation the support of those media organizations who are familiar with his work and who are most capable of judging the quality of his work is very important. In this context it is important that some media organization