Skip to main content

Presidential candidate: With Congress in crisis, opposition makes 'wrong choice'

Draupadi Murmu, Yashwant Sinha
By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* 
Congress leader Rahul Gandhi was interrogated for nearly 50-60 hours for five days by the Enforcement Directorate (ED). Summons have also gone to party president Sonia Gandhi in the National Herald case. Everyone knows the reality, that “National Herald” was a mouthpiece of the Congress, and earlier of India’s freedom movement. It was founded by Jawaharlal Nehru.
In recent years, this paper and its sister concerns, “Navjeevan” in Hindi and “Kaumi Awaz” in Urdu, were defunct. The paper suffered serious losses and was closed in 2008. Rahul Gandhi was instrumental in reviving it in 2016.
All the issues related to the case are basically technical in nature, based on interpretation. One cannot really say that somebody made money, but things do happen on the advice of lawyers and chartered accountants -- people follow certain pattern to protect their businesses. It depends on which side of the coin you are on, and how you interpret it.
Congress workers were on the street. However, except for DMK and its leader MK Stalin, we did not hear many voices in condemnation of the Central government for misusing ED and other agencies, which is a sad reflection of politics today.
Everyone knows this was being done to intimidate Rahul Gandhi and Sonia Gandhi and decimate the party or push it into silence before the presidential elections. Meanwhile, apparently taking advantage of the situation, Mamata Banerjee, always wanting to go centre-stage, without consulting anyone, started an ‘opposition conclave’ for having a joint presidential candidate. She did not utter a single word about the continuous harassment of Rahul Gandhi by ED.
Initially, she tried to push Sharad Pawar for the post, but Pawar being Pawar, he would never agree to such a thing, unless he is sure of victory. So he politely refused. After that, Mamata asked Farooq Abdullah and Gopal Krishna Gandhi to be opposition candidate. All this was happening without proper consultation. Both Abdullah and Gandhi refused.
Finally, Mamata again jumped her guns and somehow managed to get her party in the front position in the presidential elections. She wanted to seize the opportunity when the Congress was fighting its own battle, and hence asked her party MP Yashwant Sinha to resign and contest as Opposition candidate, which he happily accepted.
The Congress had sent Jairam Ramesh and Mallikarjun Khadge to participate in the all-party meeting called by Mamata. It agreed to Sinha’s name. The fact is the party leaders had no time to discuss, because the Congress itself was in its own crisis, as Rahul Gandhi was being interrogated.
Mamata’s hyped ambitions have many a time created an embarrassment for the opposition parties. For the sake of opposition unity, both Congress as well as Left parties participated in the meeting despite many differences.
Narendra Modi and Amit Shah, of course, are always keen to ensure that the opposition suffers a heavy blow. But this time, the fact of the matter is that, the opposition parties too had no time to properly discuss out a candidate. With the Congress already in a crisis mode, it was Mamata and Sharad Pawar who grabbed the opportunity, but it boomeranged.
Indeed, BJP has gain succeeded in the politics of representation, much better than its opponents. The choice of Draupadi Murmu, a Santhal Adivasi, as the NDA Presidential candidate is of enormous political value and might pay heavily to those who oppose her. BJP succeeded in bringing two most powerful allies, Naveen Patnaik from Odisha and Jagan Reddy from Andhra Pradesh. Other non-NDA parties will also find it difficult to oppose Murmu.
It is for the first time in Indian history that an Adivasi woman will become president of India, and it has a great symbolic value. We cannot undermine it plainly by asking: what would she do for Adivasis? 
Mamata Banerjee, Sharad Pawar
It would be difficult for Hemant Soren to oppose her in Jharkhand, as when she was governor, she refused to sign the amendment to the Chhotanagpur Tenancy Act (CNTA) and the Santhal Pargana Tenancy Act (SPTA). At that time,the then chief minister Raghubar Das, tried to change the original Act which had protected the Adivasi rights in forests. There were lots of protests in Jharkhand and ultimately the governor refused to sign the amended Bill.
Many people are asking why did she sweep a Shiva temple? Political leaders are known to do such jobs as part of political exigency. But why question her faith? Gyani Zail Singh, too, followed the diktat of the Akal Takht, which declared him “tankhaiya”, and hence, to atone the high religious body, he cleaned the shoes of the devotees who came to Harmandir Sahib.
The upper caste morality of questioning people from the marginalised sections is patronising, to say the least. It means, Dr Rajendra Prasad must have done something for Kayasthas, Dr Radhakrishanan for Brahmins, Dr Sanjeeva Reddy for feudal landlords, Pranab Mukherjee again for Brahmins, Pratibha Patil for women etc.
You cannot fault BJP or RSS for working with Adivasis. That is their long-term programme, and they have been working among them for years. Today, they are in power, so their outreach has already expanded, but the party is not satisfied with what it has achieved. It continues to cement its ties with Adivasis, keeping in mind its long-term political benefits.
Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, Odisha, Maharashtra, Telangana, Rajasthan, Andhra Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and Gujarat have significant Adivasi presence. These states are going to poll in the near future. President Ram Nath Kovind made several visits to Uttar Pradesh during the elections, but since Dalit population is politicised, the impact wasn’t that big.
But the situation might be different as Draupadi Murmu, who is the first Adivasi leader rising to the top post of the country. It would have the necessary impact, too.
While Murmu’s choice gave a benefit to BJP and NDA, the opposition could have made a better choice than Yashwant Sinha. Though he was brought into politics by Chandrashekhar, Sinha made good relations with op BJP leaders. During VP Singh’s Mandal period, Sinha was sitting in the opposition camp. The problem with Sinha was that he considered himself much bigger than what other politicians could think about him.
An arrogant savarna leader, Sinha was finance minister in the short term Chandrashekhar regime, and then AB Vajpayee included him in his ministry, where he served in various ministries, including External Affairs and Finance. As Finance Minister, he could not bring new ideals to the Ministry.
Sinha never really dissociated himself from RSS, and like Arun Shourie, he too was hoping that Modi would take care of him. Both started criticising Modi only after Modi completely dissociated from them.
Sinha felt he was the ‘need of the hour’ for BJP but Modi never thought that way. Finally, he left BJP and became a critic of Modi’s style of functioning. He has been critiquing Modi, but not the Sangh Parivar. His son is still an important functionary of the party, and was a minister under Modi.
Opposition parties should have been serious about putting up a joint candidate. But they failed to do so. Perhaps, Mamata Banjerjee’s ambition to create a central niche for herself cost the opposition huge. While the numbers looked good for the opposition earlier, it looks clear that Yashwant Sinha may not get even opposition votes as most of the regional parties will think twice before voting him.
Of course, we all know that presidents don’t have much power. Indeed, not much is expected from Draupadi Murmu. One can only expect that she will be the guardian of our Constitution and and uphold our Constitutional values and rights of the marginalized people when they are under the threat.
Will she be able to do that? Let us see what she does once she assumes the high office. Till then, we can keep our fingers crossed.
---
*Human rights defender. Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/vbrawat, twitter: @freetohumanity

Comments

Anonymous said…
Media freedom does npt mean public masturbation and instigations

TRENDING

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam* RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

Kailash Satyarthi NGO makes slum kids laud RSS founder Hedgewar as freedom fighter

By Rajiv Shah  In a move which may raise many an eyebrow, a Nobel laureate Kailash Satyarthi-supported child rights NGO has celebrated Prime Minister Narendra Modi-intitiated Har Ghar Tiranga by commemorating 75 freedom fighters by "narrating their famous deeds and chanting slogans of each leader", including Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru, Subhas Chandra Bose, Lala Lajpat Rai and a person who had little or nothing common with the freedom movement -- RSS founder Keshav Baliram Hedgewar. A communique from the Kailash Satyarthi Childrens Foundation (KSCF), which organised the event, said among the freedom fighters celebrated by 75 children on the occasion of 75 years of India's independence placing photographs of each freedom fighter included that of Hedgewar, who is alleged to have maintained a distance from Indian Independence movement led by Gandhiji. According to Hedgewar's biography, when Gandhiji launched the Salt Satyagraha in 1930, Hedgewar sent information ev

Savarkar in Ahmedabad 'declared' two-nation theory in 1937, Jinnah followed 3 years later

By Our Representative One of the top freedom fighters whom BJP and Prime Minister Narendra Modi revere the most, Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, was also a great supporter of the two nation theory for India, one for Hindus another for Muslims, claims a new expose on the man who is also known to be the original proponent of the concept of Hindutva.

Unlike other revolutionaries, Hindutva icon wrote 5 mercy petitions to British masters

By Shamsul Islam*  The Hindutva icon VD Savarkar of the RSS-BJP rulers of India submitted not one, two,or three but five mercy petitions to the British masters! Savarkarites argue: “There are no evidences to prove that Savarkar collaborated with the British for his release from jail. In fact, his appeal for release was a ruse. He was well aware of the political developments outside and wanted to be part of it. So he kept requesting for his release. But the British authorities did not trust him a bit” (YD Phadke, ‘A complex Hero’, "The Indian Expres"s, August 31, 2004)

Golwalkar's views on tricolour, martyrs, minorities, caste as per RSS archives

By Shamsul Islam*  First time in the history of independent India, the in-charge minister of the Cultural Ministry in the current Modi government, Prahlad Singh Patel, has glorified MS Golwalkar, second supremo of the RSS and the most prominent ideologue of the RSS till date, on his birth anniversary, February 19. In a tweet he wrote : “Remembering a great thinker, scholar, and remarkable leader #MSGolwalkar on his birth anniversary. His thoughts will remain a source of inspiration & continue to guide generations.”

Gujarat's 'low-key' communalism: right-wing groups compete for anti-Muslim space

By Rajiv Shah  Noticing the emergence of a novel trend, a just-released report based on a fact-finding team's observations following its interaction in particular with Hindu and Muslim political activists, administrators and police officials, has claimed that a major reason why chasm between the two communities in Gujarat has lately reached new heights is, a veritable competition between Hindu right-wing groups and leaders to capture the existing communal space. Titled "Hindu Right, Communal Riots and Demolitions: Emerging Pattern of Communal Riots in India", the report has been prepared against the backdrop of what it calls "low intensity" communalism which has characterised rioting in Gujarat in the recent past, especially after the 2002 communal carnage, one of the worst in Independent India. Especially focusing on riots in two Gujarat towns, Himmatnagar and Khambhat, which took place on April 10, the day clashes broke also out in different parts of India on

Gujarat govt 'contradicts' MHA memo while freeing Bilkis Bano gangrape convicts

By Our Representative  The All-India Progressive Women's Association (AIPWA) has said that Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah "must answer for the decision to free Bilkis Bano's gang rapists." In a statement, AIPWA has wondered, "What was the basis of the Gujarat Government’s decision to free those men on August 15, 2022, to celebrate what the PM Modi calls India’s Amrit Kaal? Was remission and freedom a reward for rape and murder of Muslims?" The statement comes amidst an Ahmedabad-based legal rights non-pofit, which took up the cause of Bilkis Bano and fought her case right up to the Supreme Court, Centre for Social Justice (CSJ), suggesting that the Gujarat government move to allow remission to the convicts contradicts the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) Guidelines for Granting Special Remission to Prisoners on August 15, 2022 (75th anniversary of Independence), January 26, 2023, and again on August 15, 2023. Citing the MHA notificat

Need to ask at today's 'critical juncture' of India's history: Whose Freedom@75?

By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ*  The official propaganda states that: “Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav is an initiative of the Government of India to celebrate and commemorate 75 years of independence and the glorious history of it's people, culture and achievements. This Mahotsav is dedicated to the people of India who have not only been instrumental in bringing India thus far in its evolutionary journey but also hold within them the power and potential to enable Prime Minister Narendra Modi's vision of activating India 2.0, fuelled by the spirit of Aatmanirbhar Bharat. The official journey of Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav commenced on 12th March 2021 which started a 75-week countdown to our 75th anniversary of independence and will end post a year on 15th August 2023.” So as India completes a landmark seventy-five years of freedom – a platinum jubilee – the only question one needs to ask at this critical juncture of the country’s history is “whose freedom@75?” Since March 2020, it has been a di

Har ghar tiranga: will the hungry bellies raise their hand to unfurl the national flag?

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*  Indians are going to unfurl the tricolour to celebrate the 75th anniversary of India's Independence on 15th of August 2022. Indian freedom struggle has not only shaped India as a modern constitutional democracy but also shaped the nature of state, society and citizenship. The anti-colonial, anti-capitalist, anti-feudal and anti-imperialist struggle were the four pillars of Indian freedom struggle that laid the foundation of a sovereign nation state promised to pursue a society based on socialist, scientific and secular values to ensure egalitarian citizenship rights without any form of discrimination. These inalienable values are central to the unity, integrity, peace, prosperity and progress of India as a multicultural society and secular state. It is time to celebrate these values and promises of Indian independence, a product of struggles and sacrifice of millions of working-class people across the country. India at 75 is still a young nation but old e

RSS, Sangh Parivar consider tricolour as "state flag" and not "national flag"

By Teesta Setalvad* Today, when the nation has been independent for 67 years, the Sangh Parivar is set to launch ‘Tiranga yatras’ and Satyagrahas to defend the honour of the flag and the nation. Yet when the Indian people were involved in the decades-long struggle for freedom against British imperialism, the RSS was conspicuous by its absence in the struggle. When thousands of people faced lathis, bullets and jail sentences for hoisting the tiranga and participated all over the country in satyagraha during the Civil Disobedience and Quit India movements against the British Raj, the Sangh publicly took the stand that it would not take part in the movement and seldom missed the opportunity of assuring the British rulers that they would keep to the right side of colonial law and avoid any clash with the authorities. Of course the reason given for this was that the Sangh was secretly strengthening itself and would take on British imperialism only when it was strong enough to do so! A simil