Skip to main content

UP demolitions 'collective, extra judicial' punishment, Apex Court 'must intervene'

By Bharat Dogra* 

A letter released on June 14 and sent to the Supreme Court by former law minister Shanti Bhushan, six former judges, some senior advocates and legal luminaries has termed the recent repressive actions against protestors, including demolitions, in Uttar Pradesh “illegal.” 
Shanti Bhushan was law minister during 1977-79 and had worked closely with the most senior BJP leaders like Atal Bihari Vajpayee and LK Advani who were then his Cabinet colleagues.
In a separate observation, former Chief Justice of the Allahabad High Court in Uttar Pradesh Justice Govind Mathur has also called the demolition action completely illegal. Govind Mathur has a very high reputation and his opinion is valued very highly in legal circles, not just in Uttar Pradesh but all over the country.
In a reference to the demolition of the house belonging to the wife of a leader of the Welfare Party, Javed Mohammad, on June 12, Justice Mathur said, “This is totally illegal. Even if you assume for a moment that the construction was illegal, which by the way is how crores of Indians live, it is impermissible that you demolish a house on Sunday when the residents are in custody. It is not a technical question but a question of rule of law.”
Subsequently, in another interview he stated that those who suffer heavily in such illegal actions are entitled to receive compensation for the loss suffered by them.
The letter by Shanti Bhushan, which has been signed by former judges B Sudarshan Reddy, V Gopala Gowda and AK Ganguly (of the Supreme Court) and AP Shah, K Chandru and Mohammed Anwar (various High Courts) has appealed to the Supreme Court to take suo motu cognizance of the recent acts of bulldozing of residences of protestors, particularly in Prayagraj ( UP). The letter says instead of giving protestors a hearing, the UP administration appears to have sanctioned violence against them.
This letter says: 
“Videos of young men in police custody being beaten with lathis, houses of protestors being demolished without notice or any cause of action, and protestors from the minority Muslim community being chased and beaten by the police, are circulating on social media, shaking the conscience of the nation. 
"Such a brutal clampdown by a ruling administration is an unacceptable subversion of the rule of law… It is a violation of the rights of citizens, and makes a mockery of the Constitution and fundamental rights guaranteed by the State.”
The letter states, “The coordinated manner in which the police and development authorities have acted leads to the clear conclusion that demolitions are a form of collective extra judicial punishment attributable to a state policy which is illegal.”
These observations of former senior judges, senior advocates and the former law minister are extremely important and one hopes that these result in further legal actions to protect basic rights of people and ensure justice to them.
---
*Honorary convener, Campaign to Save Earth Now; recent books include ‘A Day in 2071’, ‘Man over Machine' and ‘Planet in Peril'

Comments

TRENDING

Right to walk, right to livelihood: Clearing footpaths 'can't mean' clearing out the urban poor

By Aseem Mishra*    India’s cities are locked in a quiet but intensifying struggle over one of their most contested public spaces: the footpath. For pedestrians, a footpath is basic infrastructure—a strip of ground that should allow people to move safely, independently and with dignity. For millions of informal workers, the same stretch of pavement is a workplace, a source of daily income and often the difference between survival and destitution.

Ample evidence of child labour in South Gujarat's cash rich sugarcane belt: Study

By Rajiv Shah A recent German government-funded study , undertaken jointly by the NGO Prayas Centre for Labour Research and Action and the Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung, which mainly deals examines the working conditions of migrant workers in the cash-rich sugarcane zone of South Gujarat, has gone a long way to suggest large scale prevalence of child labour during the harvesting season.

Women lawyers petition Supreme Court, seek reconsideration of Aug 4 order on bar council co-option

By A Representative   A group of women advocates who stood sixth and seventh among female candidates in the recent Bar Council elections have filed a petition before the Supreme Court, seeking a recall and reconsideration of the Court’s August 4 order determining the mechanism for co-opting women into State Bar Councils.