Skip to main content

Gujarat's reservation policy: State govt "refuses" RTI information on meetings, minutes at CM level

Kirit Rathod
By A Representative
In a step, which is likely to raise eye-brows of India’s top right to information (RTI) activists, the Gujarat government has refused to part with any information regarding official review of the state’s reservation policy towards Dalits, Adivasis and Other Backward Classes (OBCs) between 2001 and 2015.
In their RTI replies, officials of the Gujarat government have said that state departments do not have “any record” on review of the reservation policy, nor have any committees been set up at the chief ministerial or ministerial level regarding this.
Senior Dalit rights activist Kirit Rathod, in an RTI plea, had sought “agenda and minutes of the meetings, which may have taken place for reviewing the quota policy under the chairmanship of the chief minister at district, departmental, ministerial, or chief ministerial level."
Addressed to the general administration department (GAD) of the Gujarat government, responsible for personnel issues, Rathod’s application was transferred to two separate departments for a reply – social justice and empowerment and tribal development.
Giving details of the reply he received from the two departments, Rathod, who is associated with top Gujarat Dalit rights NGO, Navsarjan Trust, Ahmedabad, says, the public information officer (PIO) of the tribal development department, Narendra Vaghela, in a “shocking” reply told him that since reservation is a “policy issue, it does not deal with it.”
As for the social justice and empowerment department, Rathod received two separate replies. One of them, by PIO JV Desai, was on Gujarat OBCs, which said that the department “does not have any records of the review of the reservation policy under the chairmanship of the chief minister.”
It further said, “The department has not constituted any committee for the review of the reservation policy at the district, departmental, ministerial or chief ministerial level.”
In a separate reply on Gujarat Dalits, PIO Jagdish Khadiya said, “Since the issues involved regarding reservation policy Dalits is not on agenda, it is not possible to provide any information.”
Rathod wonders whether the replies suggest the Gujarat government has not been serious in reviewing the implementation of the reservation policy at the highest level. “It exposes government claims that it is remains committed to reservation”, he says in a communiqué.
The Navsarjan Trust activist had demanded information about the reviews that may have taken place under the reservation policy against the backdrop of demand for quota within the OBC framework by upper caste Patel agitators.
The Patel agitation, which began in mid-2015, spread to all parts of Gujarat, is said to be the main reason why the ruling BJP lost district and taluka panchayat elections, held in November-end and early December, at the hand of the opposition Congress.
Rathod asks, “Does one conclude that neither under the chief ministership of Narendra Modi, who calls himself OBC, nor under Anandiben Patel, the present chief minister, no committees have been made or reviews taken place regarding the reservation policy either at their level or at the ministerial level?”
Rathod says, the reply is particularly surprising, as the state government had reportedly set up a committee under the chairmanship of senior minister Nitin Patel to look into the quota demand of the Patel agitators.
“It is difficult to understand why state officials are refusing to part any details of its meetings”, he says.

Comments

  1. RTI द्वारा PMO से माँगी गयी जानकारी रेलवे द्वारा धारा 7(1) के अंतर्गत आदेशित लेटर DLW वाराणसी में लंबित

    ReplyDelete
  2. Venkatesh NayakJanuary 08, 2016

    This is so typical. Deny that anything is happening until they reach a decision. It might be worthwhile to write to the NHRC on this issue.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

NOTE: Hateful, abusive comments won't be published. -- Editor

TRENDING

Right to walk, right to livelihood: Clearing footpaths 'can't mean' clearing out the urban poor

By Aseem Mishra*    India’s cities are locked in a quiet but intensifying struggle over one of their most contested public spaces: the footpath. For pedestrians, a footpath is basic infrastructure—a strip of ground that should allow people to move safely, independently and with dignity. For millions of informal workers, the same stretch of pavement is a workplace, a source of daily income and often the difference between survival and destitution.

Gujarat Sachivalaya blacklists, denies entry to woman social activist: Will NHRC probe?

By Kantilal Parmar*  I have approached the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) seeking an independent, impartial, and transparent investigation into a serious incident that took place at the Gujarat Secretariat in Gandhinagar on August 18, 2026. The matter concerns social activist and women’s rights leader Chandrikaben Solanki, who, according to the information available to me, was denied an entry pass to the Secretariat when she went there to meet Gujarat’s Social Justice and Empowerment Minister, Dr. Manishaben Vakil, to raise an issue concerning social justice.

Ample evidence of child labour in South Gujarat's cash rich sugarcane belt: Study

By Rajiv Shah A recent German government-funded study , undertaken jointly by the NGO Prayas Centre for Labour Research and Action and the Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung, which mainly deals examines the working conditions of migrant workers in the cash-rich sugarcane zone of South Gujarat, has gone a long way to suggest large scale prevalence of child labour during the harvesting season.