Nehru "called" Netaji war criminal? Fresh document nails the lie, "Modi govt sources" behind fake letter

The fake letter which triggered controversy

By A Representative
Amidst raging controversy over whether Jawaharlal Nehru considered Subhas Chandra Bose a war criminal, a fresh document from the Netaji files released by the Government of India has come to light, which shows that Nehru rejected any such attempt which may have been made after Netaji’s death.
Marked “Secret/Immediate”, and dated April 2, 1956, the document, which carries the National Archives of India stamp, relates to Nehru’s meeting with Suresh Chandra Bose, Netaji’s brother, and Shah Nawaz Khan in the morning. It is marked “Prime Minister’s Secretariat” at the top.
Here, Nehru has been quoted as saying, “I told Shri Suresh Bose that the question of War Criminals does not arise and we are not going to ask the USA or any other country as to whether Netaji is in the list of their War Criminals. Possibly, their answer would be that he believed he was dead.”

Authentic Nehru document

Nehru underlines in the document, on pages 130-31, “Anyhow, we do not propose to do anything in the matter. There can be no question whatever of our handing over any person, even a non-Indian who seeks refuge in out country, to a foreign power, much less an Indian national of repute.”
Forming part of the 202 pages of Netaji documents (click HERE), the Nehru quote has come to light following the recent release of another set of Netaji files, in which a stenographer quotes Nehru as writing to Prime Minister Clement Attlee, “I understand from a reliable source that Subhas Chandra Bose, your war criminal, has been allowed to enter Russian territory.”
The stenographer, in his affidavit before the Khosla Commission, further quotes Nehru, “This is clear treachery and a betrayal of faith by the Russians. As Russia has been an ally of the British-Americans, it should not have done it. Please take note of it and do what you consider proper and fit.”
The stenographer’s affidavit is qualified by, “contents of the letter as far as I remember”, and does not say whether the letter was sent to Attlee. It merely states, “Nehru gave me four papers from his writing pad to make on the typewriter four copies of a letter, which he would dictate to me on my typewriter with which I also complied.”
While top historian Ramchandra Guha immediately declared that the stenographer was “seeking publicity and Nehru would never have written such a letter”, another National Archives document on the Imperial War Museum of London came to light, which said that UK “did not draw up a list of Indian war criminals.”
Pointing out that such a list was “drawn up only for Japanese and German nationals”, the document further says, “Even if Netaji’s name had been on any such list, his name would have been removed following his death soon after World War II.”

Rahul's Kanwal's post quoting Modi sources

Meanwhile a fake letter, purportedly “leaked” by circles close to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, started taking rounds. While the letter was supposed to have been written by Nehru, it misspelled Jawahalal as “Jawharlal”, calls British Prime Minister UK Prime Minister, apart from several other glaring errors which Nehru would never have made. Unsigned, it does not bear any stamp of National Archives of India, either.
The letter went viral on social media after Rahul Kanwal, “India Today” managing-editor wrote in a Facebook post (subsequently withdrawn, though available on social media as a screenshot) just ahead of the release of 100 new Netaji documents, “Sources in the Modi government who have knowledge of the Netaji files have told India Today that in one of the files Jawaharlal Nehru referred to Subhas Chandra Bose as a 'war criminal’.”
Kanwal claimed, “This letter was written to the Prime Minister of England Clement Attlee on Dec 27, 1945”, after which it quotes from the Nehru “letter”. He adds, “This letter is likely to set off political furore in India, as if feeds the long-held notion that Nehru was unfair to the legacy of the great Netaji Bose.”

Comments

10,000 students deprived of classes as Ahmedabad school remains shut: MCC writes to Gujarat CM

By A Representative The Minority Coordination Committee (MCC) has written to Gujarat Chief Minister Bhupendra Patel, urging him to immediately reopen the Seventh Day Adventist School in Maninagar, Ahmedabad, where classes have been suspended for nearly two weeks. The MCC claims that the suspension, following a violent incident, violates the constitutional right to education of thousands of children.

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor* This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Gujarat minority rights group seeks suspension of Botad police officials for brutal assault on minor

By A Representative A human rights group, the Minority Coordination Committee (MCC) Gujarat, has written to the Director General of Police (DGP), Gandhinagar, demanding the immediate suspension and criminal action against police personnel of Botad police station for allegedly brutally assaulting a minor boy from the Muslim community.

On Teachers’ Day, remembering Mother Teresa as the teacher of compassion

By Fr. Cedric Prakash SJ It is Teachers’ Day once again! Significantly, the day also marks the Feast of St. Teresa of Calcutta (still lovingly called Mother Teresa). In 2012, the United Nations, as a fitting tribute to her, declared this day the International Day of Charity. A day pregnant with meaning—one that we must celebrate as meaningfully as possible.

What mainstream economists won’t tell you about Chinese modernisation

By Shiran Illanperuma China’s modernisation has been one of the most remarkable processes of the 21st century and one that has sparked endless academic debate. Meng Jie (孟捷), a distinguished professor from the School of Marxism at Fudan University in Shanghai, has spent the better part of his career unpacking this process to better understand what has taken place.

Targeted eviction of Bengali-speaking Muslims across Assam districts alleged

By A Representative A delegation led by prominent academic and civil rights leader Sandeep Pandey visited three districts in Assam—Goalpara, Dhubri, and Lakhimpur—between 2 and 4 September 2025 to meet families affected by recent demolitions and evictions. The delegation reported widespread displacement of Bengali-speaking Muslim communities, many of whom possess valid citizenship documents including Aadhaar, voter ID, ration cards, PAN cards, and NRC certification.

'Govts must walk the talk on gender equality, right to health, human rights to deliver SDGs by 2030'

By A Representative With just 64 months left to deliver on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), global health and rights advocates have called upon governments to honour their commitments on gender equality and the human right to health. Speaking ahead of the 80th United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), experts warned that rising anti-rights and anti-gender pushes are threatening hard-won progress on SDG-3 (health and wellbeing) and SDG-5 (gender equality).

Is U.S. fast losing its financial and technological edge under Trump’s second tenure?

By Dr. Manoj Kumar Mishra* The United States, along with its Western European allies, once promoted globalization as a democratic force that would deliver shared prosperity and balanced growth. That promise has unraveled. Globalization, instead of building an even world, has produced one defined by inequality, asymmetry of power, and new vulnerabilities. For decades, Washington successfully turned this system to its advantage. Today, however, under Trump’s second administration, America is attempting to exploit the weaknesses of others without acknowledging how exposed it has become itself.

Gandhiji quoted as saying his anti-untouchability view has little space for inter-dining with "lower" castes

By A Representative A senior activist close to Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA) leader Medha Patkar has defended top Booker prize winning novelist Arundhati Roy’s controversial utterance on Gandhiji that “his doctrine of nonviolence was based on an acceptance of the most brutal social hierarchy the world has ever known, the caste system.” Surprised at the police seeking video footage and transcript of Roy’s Mahatma Ayyankali memorial lecture at the Kerala University on July 17, Nandini K Oza in a recent blog quotes from available sources to “prove” that Gandhiji indeed believed in “removal of untouchability within the caste system.”

Counterview

Search This Blog