Skip to main content

Nehru "called" Netaji war criminal? Fresh document nails the lie, "Modi govt sources" behind fake letter

The fake letter which triggered controversy
By Our Representative
Amidst raging controversy over whether Jawaharlal Nehru considered Subhas Chandra Bose a war criminal, a fresh document from the Netaji files released by the Government of India has come to light, which shows that Nehru rejected any such attempt which may have been made after Netaji’s death.
Marked “Secret/Immediate”, and dated April 2, 1956, the document, which carries the National Archives of India stamp, relates to Nehru’s meeting with Suresh Chandra Bose, Netaji’s brother, and Shah Nawaz Khan in the morning. It is marked “Prime Minister’s Secretariat” at the top.
Here, Nehru has been quoted as saying, “I told Shri Suresh Bose that the question of War Criminals does not arise and we are not going to ask the USA or any other country as to whether Netaji is in the list of their War Criminals. Possibly, their answer would be that he believed he was dead.” 
Authentic Nehru document
Nehru underlines in the document, on pages 130-31, “Anyhow, we do not propose to do anything in the matter. There can be no question whatever of our handing over any person, even a non-Indian who seeks refuge in out country, to a foreign power, much less an Indian national of repute.”
Forming part of the 202 pages of Netaji documents (click HERE), the Nehru quote has come to light following the recent release of another set of Netaji files, in which a stenographer quotes Nehru as writing to Prime Minister Clement Attlee, “I understand from a reliable source that Subhas Chandra Bose, your war criminal, has been allowed to enter Russian territory.”
The stenographer, in his affidavit before the Khosla Commission, further quotes Nehru, “This is clear treachery and a betrayal of faith by the Russians. As Russia has been an ally of the British-Americans, it should not have done it. Please take note of it and do what you consider proper and fit.”
The stenographer’s affidavit is qualified by, “contents of the letter as far as I remember”, and does not say whether the letter was sent to Attlee. It merely states, “Nehru gave me four papers from his writing pad to make on the typewriter four copies of a letter, which he would dictate to me on my typewriter with which I also complied.”
While top historian Ramchandra Guha immediately declared that the stenographer was “seeking publicity and Nehru would never have written such a letter”, another National Archives document on the Imperial War Museum of London came to light, which said that UK “did not draw up a list of Indian war criminals.”
Pointing out that such a list was “drawn up only for Japanese and German nationals”, the document further says, “Even if Netaji’s name had been on any such list, his name would have been removed following his death soon after World War II.” 
Rahul's Kanwal's post quoting Modi sources
Meanwhile a fake letter, purportedly “leaked” by circles close to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, started taking rounds. While the letter was supposed to have been written by Nehru, it misspelled Jawahalal as “Jawharlal”, calls British Prime Minister UK Prime Minister, apart from several other glaring errors which Nehru would never have made. Unsigned, it does not bear any stamp of National Archives of India, either.
The letter went viral on social media after Rahul Kanwal, “India Today” managing-editor wrote in a Facebook post (subsequently withdrawn, though available on social media as a screenshot) just ahead of the release of 100 new Netaji documents, “Sources in the Modi government who have knowledge of the Netaji files have told India Today that in one of the files Jawaharlal Nehru referred to Subhas Chandra Bose as a 'war criminal’.”
Kanwal claimed, “This letter was written to the Prime Minister of England Clement Attlee on Dec 27, 1945”, after which it quotes from the Nehru “letter”. He adds, “This letter is likely to set off political furore in India, as if feeds the long-held notion that Nehru was unfair to the legacy of the great Netaji Bose.”

Comments

TRENDING

Insider plot to kill Deendayal Upadhyay? What RSS pracharak Balraj Madhok said

By Shamsul Islam*  Balraj Madhok's died on May 2, 2016 ending an era of old guards of Hindutva politics. A senior RSS pracharak till his death was paid handsome tributes by the RSS leaders including PM Modi, himself a senior pracharak, for being a "stalwart leader of Jan Sangh. Balraj Madhok ji's ideological commitment was strong and clarity of thought immense. He was selflessly devoted to the nation and society. I had the good fortune of interacting with Balraj Madhok ji on many occasions". The RSS also issued a formal condolence message signed by the Supremo Mohan Bhagwat on behalf of all swayamsevaks, referring to his contribution of commitment to nation and society. He was a leading RSS pracharak on whom his organization relied for initiating prominent Hindutva projects. But today nobody in the RSS-BJP top hierarchy remembers/talks about Madhok as he was an insider chronicler of the immense degeneration which was spreading as an epidemic in the high echelons of th

Central pollution watchdog sees red in Union ministry labelling waste to energy green

By Chythenyen Devika Kulasekaran*  “Destructors”, “incinerators” and “waste-to-energy (WTE) incineration” all mean the same thing – indiscriminate burning of garbage! Having a history of about one and a half centuries, WTE incinerators have seen several reboots over the 19th, 20th and 21st centuries. 

First-of-its-kind? 'Eco-friendly, low cost' sewage treatment system installed in Gujarat

Counterview Desk Following the installation of the Unconventional Decentralized Multi-Stage Reactor (UDMSR) for sewage treatment, a note on what is claimed to be the  first-of-its-kind technology said, the treated sewage from this system “can be directly utilized for agricultural purposes”, even as proving to be a “saviour in the times of water crisis.”

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Indo-Bangla border: Farmers facing 'illegal obstacles' in harvesting, transporting yields

  Counterview Desk  In a representation to the chairperson, National Human Rights Commission, human rights defender Kirity Roy, who is secretary, Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha (MASUM), has said that Border Security Force (BSF) personnel are creating "illegal obstacles" for farmers seeking to harvest their ripened yields and transport them to the market in village Jhaukuthi of Cooch Behar district.

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

Wasteland, a colonial legacy, being used to 'give away' vast tracts to Ratnagiri refinery

By Fouziya Tehzeeb* William D’Souza, a 55-year old farmer from Kuthethur, Mangalore, was busy mixing cattle feed when we arrived at his doorsteps. Around 25 km from the bustling city of Mangalore, Kuthethur is a lush green village with thick vegetation. On the way to William’s house the idyllic view gets blocked by the flares and smoke arising from the Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Limited (MRPL).

CAA disregards India's inclusive plural ethos, 'betrays' ideals of freedom struggle: PUCL

Counterview Desk    "Outraged" at the move of the Central government to implement the Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019 (CAA 2019) weeks before the election, the top rights group, People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), has demanded that the law be repealed. 

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Invincible, Modi 'taller' than BJP, RSS: An opportunity for Congress beyond 2024?

By NS Venkataraman*  With the announcement of poll schedule for the 2024 parliamentary election, there is palpable excitement and expectation amongst the countrymen  about the shape of things to happen in India after the  results of the election would be announced. There is also speculation abroad about the future course of developments in India.