Skip to main content

Govt of India seeking to "over-centralize" higher education in the name of promoting public-private partnership

An AISEC rally in Delhi against New Education Policy
By Our Representative
The All-India Save Education Committee (AISEC), a civil society organization of left-wing educationists, has accused the Ministry of Human Resources and Development (MHRD), Government of India, of seeking to take the country towards centralization of higher education under the garb of having quality education.
Commenting on the proposed New Education Policy (NEP) of the MHRD, in an exhausting AISEC in its 31-page scrutiny quotes from the Government of India document, which says that, to improve the quality of education, there is a need for “a robust regulatory mechanism” to fight the challenge posed by its “unprecedented, yet unplanned expansion”.
Says AISEC, NEP believes this expansion is because of “private institutions”, who have been instrumental in poor quality of higher education, with many of them lacking “proper infrastructure and faculty strength” and “poor academic standards”, even as taking “exorbitant fees from students.”
In an effort to control this unplanned expansion, AISEC says, the effort is to promote public private partnership (PPP) in order to meet “wide resource gaps” needing to improve “service delivery and promotion of excellence.” It underlines, “This trend of centralizing everything is aimed really at attempts to concentrate power to curb opposition.”
The effort to promote PPP is being pursued, even though the NEP document that it has been a failure, says AISEC. AISEC quotes the document as saying, “While PPP in higher education has been pursued as a strategy, not many have shown successful results.”
Comments AISEC, “Clearly, on the plea of private institutions working below the mark, the policymakers are after firm control. Their words themselves are confusing because expansion does not challenge quality; unplanned may.”
Wondering if there is a “hidden agenda”, AISEC says, the MHRD document proposes that a “single regulatory body be set up for equity, expansion and excellence.” Even as talking of autonomy, AISEC states, the document talks of “uniformity in terms of syllabi and curricula through a framework”, and “possibility of a single national test in place of multiplicity of entrance and eligibility examinations.”
“In short, with contradictory and verbose pronouncements NEP talks of looking for curb of academic autonomy, for bringing everything under single control. Neither is the idea new, nor straightforward”, says AISEC, insisting, NEP’s stress on uniformity of syllabi and single national test are “detrimental to education in this vast country with thousand and one variations destroy a wholesome education.”
Even as seeking to control education sector, AISEC says, the NEP document talks of “permitting foreign education providers… for proper regulation and internationalization”, underlining, “It is not understood how permitting foreign education providers can help proper regulation.”
AISEC further says that the NEP document talks of “norm-based funding of higher education” without pointing towards what precisely norms are and who sets them. “This is a clever manipulation on the background of corruption existing around inspection”, comments AISEC.
“The document leaves an option of the ability of institutions to charge appropriate fees from students who can afford to pay, and at the same time having a means blind system (what is that?) for the needy students ", AISEC says.
---
Click HERE to download AISEC report on New Education Policy

Comments

TRENDING

Missed call drive for VVPAT verification follows online plea to "pressure" poll panel

By Our Representative
Several political activists have begun a new campaign, asking concerned citizens to give a missed call on 9667655855 to “support the demand that 2019 Loksabha elections must be declared only after verification of 50% electronic voting machines (EVMs) with Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) receipts.” The effort, supported by civil society networks across India, is meant to "further pressure" India's election machinery to ensure that the poll outcome becomes more transparent.

Did Modi own, buy digital camera costing Rs 7 lakh in 1987-88, also used email?

Counterview Desk
In an interview to the news channel News Nation, aired on Saturday last, Prime Minister Narendra Modi declaring that he had approved the air strike despite bad weather because he felt the clouds would hide Indian planes from Pakistani radar is known to have become a laughing stock across India.

Now, top Gujarat "litterateur" close to Modi says: Godse was patriot, so was Gandhi

By Rajiv Shah
A little over a week after Prime Minister Narendra Modi criticized BJP candidate from Bhopal Pragya Thakur for calling Nathuram Godse a patriot saying he would never forgive her for the remark, a top Sangh Parivar ideologue, known to close to Modi in Gujarat, has supported her, saying her statement should be seen “within a context.” Thakur won from Bhopal by more than 3.5 lakh votes defeating her nearest rival, veteran Congressman and ex-Madhya Pradesh chief minister Digvijay Singh.

When a neo-nationalist "invaded" hijab clad ladies, Bengali looking scholar in Delhi metro

By Aditi Kundu*
Travelling in Delhi metro on a daily basis to commute from Mayur Vihar to Dwarka, I see diverse people everyday. One can hear them talk about different aspects of life, from kitchen pilitics to national politics. On the morning of May 13, I witnessed a strange incident; disturbing and amusing at the same time.

Terror attacks: Difference in public reactions in India, those in Colombo, Christchurch

By Battini Rao*
Recently, on April 20 during Easter Sunday, more than 250 people were killed in a series of coordinated terrorist attacks in churches and hotels in Colombo, Sri Lanka. Local Islamic organisations Thawheed Jamath (NJT) and Jamathei Milathu Ibrahim (JMI) are held responsible for the attack. Islamic State has also claimed responsibility.

Women lost 88 lakh jobs in 2018: Why Modi "failed" to address their disempowerment?

Counterview Desk
Five human rights leaders Anjali Bhardwaj, Shabnam Hashmi, Purnima Gupta, Dipta Bhog, and Amrita Johri of the Women March for Change have posed 56 questions (alluding to Modi’s claim of 56 inches chest) to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and BJP against the backdrop of his interview with a Bollywood star, which was allegedly masqueraded as a “non-political” conversation.

Disproportionately high death sentences against Dalits, Adivasis, Muslims: UN told

Counterview Desk
In their joint submission to the United Nations Human Rights Committee to meet for the listing of adoption of list of issues at its 126th session, July 1-26, 2019, top Dalit rights organizations have taken strong exception to, among other things, "disproportional application of death sentencing by the judiciary of minorities, such as Muslims, Dalits and Adivasis".

World Bank clarifies: Its 26th rank to India not for universal access to power but for ease of doing business

By Our Representative
In a major embarrassment to the Government of India, the World Bank has reportedly clarified that it has not ranked India 26th out of 130 countries for providing power to its population. The top international banker’s clarification comes following Union Power Minister Piyush Goyal’s claim that India has “improved to 26 position from 99” in access to electricity in just one year.

India's 80% construction sites "unsafe", deaths 20 times higher than those in Britain

By Rajiv Shah
The Government of India may be seeking to project India’s construction sector as the country’s second-largest employer of the country after agriculture, providing jobs to more than 44 million people, and contributing nearly 9% to the national GDP, yet, ironically, its workforce is more unprotected than any other industrial sector of the country. Data suggest that the possibility of a fatality is five times more likely in the construction industry  than in a manufacturing industry, and the risk of a major injury is 2.5 times higher.

India sans Modi preferable, Congress worthier recipient of Indians’ votes: The Economist

By Our Representative
In a strongly-worded and crucial commentary on Prime Minister Narendra Modi as the electoral political battle is on, influential British weekly “The Economist”, has declared that “Indians, who are in the midst of voting in a fresh election, would be better off with a different leader”, even as pointing out that that under Modi, “India’s ruling party poses a threat to democracy.”