Modi govt committed to Ram Temple, Article 370, uniform civil code, wait for two-thirds majority: Amit Shah

The cat is finally out of the bag. Much to the chagrin of the Government of India's "liberal" supporters around the world who swear by its developmental agenda, Prime Minister Narendra Modi's right-hand man, BJP chief Amit Shah, has made it clear that the ruling party has not left its "core agenda" -- including building Ram Temple at Ayodhya through a law in Parliament, and abrogation of Article 370, which would put an end to the special status to Jammu & Kashmir, and having a uniform civil code.
With Sangh Parivar affiliates, especially Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), pitching for "legalizing" the construction of Ram Temple at Ayodhya at the site where the Babri Masjid stands, Shah has reportedly said that ruling party would address “core issues” of building a Ram temple at Ayodhya, repealing Article 370 and introducing a uniform civil code in the country is very much part of the agenda.
However, there is a snag imposed upon the party by the current democratic setup. These, he said, cannot be addressed till the party has two-thirds majority in Parliament. “We don't have enough mandate to address core issues. We need 370 seats, according to the Constitution, to address these,” Shah said, talking with newspersons at the BJP headquarters.
The remarks come close on the heels of the VHP passing a resolution at Haridwar, asking the Government of India to "enact" a legislation to clear the way for construction of a Ram temple in Ayodhya. Significantly, earlier this month, Union Home Minister Rajnath Singh, speaking in Ayodhya, said that his government would not be able to address the "core issues" such as enacting a legislation, since the NDA was in minority in the Rajya Sabha.
Refusing to sound negative on Shah’s statement, VHP joint general secretary Surendrakumar Jain said the BJP chief did not refer to the issues of Ram Temple, abrogating Article 370 as “contentious” issues but had referred to them “core issues.” Only, he believed, the BJP had been given mandate not just for development. but also to deliver on the "core issues", and it much "construct temple for its political survival.”
The VHP resolution passed at Haridwar, focusing on the "core issues", said a decision had been taken to press on them "to sort out issues blocking the temple construction". It expressed “sadness that the country could not rebuild even three of the 30,000 Hindu temples destroyed by Islamic invaders”.

VHP leaders at Haridwar

The release added that they would not let a mosque or any Islamic cultural centre or monument to be built within the “cultural boundaries of Ayodhya” which involve as many as six districts of Uttar Pradesh. "Nor should any structure in the name of Mughal emperor Babur be erected anywhere in India", the VHP said.
"Ayodhya's cultural boundary is the place of Sri Ram's 'Krida, Leela and Sanskar'. Every year, thousands of devotees visit these places which have hundreds of pilgrimage sites. No Islamic prayer place or cultural structure will be built in this area. And nothing in the name of Babur will be erected anywhere in India," the resolution said.
The resolution claimed, "The court has accepted that the temple there was demolished by Babur in 1528. The government had given an affidavit that if the same was proved, it would hand over the entire land for temple construction. The government will have to keep its word."

Around 100 saints affiliated with the VHP attended the meet, VHP said. Many saints called Modi "Hinduwadi" and "our PM".
Among other demands, the VHP said, water rafting in the Ganga, one of Uttarakhand's most popular sporting activities, should be "banned" as it gives rise to obscene activities on riverbanks. Young people of both sexes come to these rafting camps, mingle, drink and indulge in objectionable activities on the banks of the holy river, where sadhus and sants gather to meditate, it alleged.

Comments

Shyam Benegal's Mathan a propaganda film that supported 'system'? No way

A few days ago, I watched Manthan, a Shyam Benegal movie released in 1976. If I remember correctly, the first time I saw this movie was with Safdar Hashmi, one of the rare young theater icons who was brutally murdered in January 1989. Back then, having completed an M.A. in English Literature from Delhi University in 1975, we would often move around together.

Beyond the Sattvik plate: Prof Anil Gupta's take on food, ethics, and sustainability

I was pleasantly surprised to receive a rather lengthy comment (I don't want to call it a rejoinder) on my blog post about the Sattvik Food Festival, held near the Sola Temple in Ahmedabad late last year. It came from no less a person than Anil Gupta, Professor Emeritus at the Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad (IIM-A), under whose guidance this annual event was held.

No to free thought? How Gujarat's private universities are cowing down their students

"Don't protest"—that's the message private universities across Gujarat seem to be conveying to their students. A senior professor told me that students at the university where he teaches are required to sign an undertaking promising not to engage in protests. "They simply sign the undertaking and hand it over to the university authorities," he said.

'Potentially lethal, carcinogenic': Global NGO questions India refusing to ban white asbestos

Associated with the Fight Inequality Alliance, a global movement that began in 2016 to "counter the concentration of power and wealth among a small elite", claiming to have members in the United Kingdom, South Africa, Kenya, Zambia, the Philippines, and Denmark, the advocacy group Confront Power appears all set to intensify its campaign against India as "the world’s largest asbestos importer".

In lieu of tribute to Pritish Nandy, said to be instrumental in collapse of Reliance-controlled daily

It is widely reported that Pritish Nandy , journalist, author, animal activist, and politician, has passed away. While it is customary to pay tributes to a departing soul—and I, too, have joined those who have posted heartfelt condolences on social media—I cannot forget the way he treated me when he was editor of the Reliance-controlled Business and Political Observer (BPO), for which I had been working informally in Moscow.

Sattvik Food Festival: Shouldn't one question notion of purity, cultural exclusion in food choices?

Recently, I visited the Sattvik Food Festival, an annual event in Ahmedabad organized by Anil Gupta, professor emeritus at the Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad (IIM-A). I have known Prof. Gupta since 1993, when I sought an appointment to meet him a few months after joining The Times of India in Ahmedabad—one reason why I have always been interested in the activities he is involved in.

Would Gujarat Governor, govt 'open up' their premises for NGOs? Activists apprehensive

Soon after I uploaded my blog about the Gujarat Governor possibly softening his stance on NGOs—evidenced by allowing a fisherfolk association to address the media at a venue controlled by the Raj Bhawan about India’s alleged failure to repatriate fishermen from Pakistani prisons—one of the media conference organizers called me. He expressed concern that my blog might harm their efforts to secure permission to hold meetings on state premises.

Challenging patriarchy? Adopting maternal and marital surnames: Resistance continues

Anandiben Patel The other day, I was talking with a group of family friends. The discussion revolved around someone very close to me who had not changed her official name in documents, including her Aadhaar and passport, after her marriage. However, on social media and within her husband's family, she had adopted her husband's surname as a suffix to her own. I mentioned that there is a growing trend—though not yet widespread—where women prefer to retain their maiden names or add their maiden surnames alongside their husband's surname. Another emerging trend is where men choose to add their mother's name, or even their wife's name, to their own. This revelation surprised my family friends.

To be or not to be Sattvik: Different communities' differing notions of purity and fasting

This is a continuation of my last blog on Sattvik food. When talking about Sattvik, there is a tendency to overlook what it may mean to different sections of people around the world. First, let me redefine Sattvik: it means having a "serene, balanced, and harmonious mind or attitude." Derived from the Sanskrit word sattva, it variously means "pure, essence, nature, vital, energy, clean, conscious, strong, courage, true, honest, and wise." How do people achieve this so-called purity? Among Gujarati Hindus, especially those from the so-called upper castes who are vegetarians, one common way is fasting. On fasting days, such as agiyarash —the 11th day of the lunar cycle in the Vedic calendar—my close relatives fast but consume milk, fruit juices, mangoes, grapes, bananas, almonds, pistachios, and potato-based foods, including fried items. Another significant fasting period is adhik maas. During this time, many of my relatives "fast" by eating only a single me...

Search This Blog