Skip to main content

Seeking to place land acquisition bill in Parliament next week, Modi govt "ignores" pre-legislative consultation policy

By Our Representative
Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s high-profile consultation platform, mygov.in, has no open space for discussion on the proposed amendments to the controversial land acquisition bill, 2015, which is scheduled to be placed before Parliament next week. A scan through the site suggests that the only bill it seeks public consultations on is Public Procurement Bill, 2012, which was introduced in the last Lok Sabha and was referred to the Parliamentary Standing Committee.
The “Open Forum” of the site, in fact, does not allow anyone to kickstart any new discussion of one’s choice. The only topic offered for online consultation on the land issue is “Modi’s Mann Ki Baat with farmers on March 22, 2015”, where there are few comments praising the Prime Minister for “clearing doubts” about the bill. The only “critique” of the bill finding its way in the discussion on the subject says that “the farmers are opposing it due to the misdeeds of the system”.
Commenting on the site, senior activist Venkatesh Nayak of the Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative, says, there has so far been “no formal effort” to discuss the law, and “there is no call for discussing the amendment proposals on the much touted public consultation platform”. He adds, “Instead one interesting topic mooted for discussion on this platform (mygov.in) amongst several is ‘Share your views for promotion of fabrics for fashion industry’.”
A scan through the site suggests that issues put up for discussion range from a model bilateral investment treaty, celebration of International Day of Yoga, action that citizens can take against misleading advertisements, a parking policy for Mumbai, the Prime Minister’s Australia visit to carpet weaving, promotion of fabrics for fashion industry, silk’s elegance and comfort and how to tackle insanitary latrines and manual scavenging.
Suggesting that this suggests lack of “formal public consultation on the amendment proposals”, Nayak says, “Neither the department of land resources, which has the responsibility for all matters relating to land acquisition law under the Allocation of Business Rules, 1961, nor any other department of the Government of India has sought people's views on the proposals to amend the 2013 Land Acquisition Act.”
Calling it a “violation of Government of india's own Pre-Legislative Consultation Policy (PLCP) adopted in January 2014” (click HERE), Nayak quotes from the PLCP, which makes it necessary to “publish/place in public domain the draft legislation or at least the information that may inter alia include brief justification for such legislation”, and its possible impact on “lives and livelihoods of the concerned/affected people” in “public domain for a minimum period of thirty days.”
The PLCP also requires that a wider publicity be given to reach out to the affected people in case a legislation affects specific groups of people, even as documenting and disclosing through print or electronic media all the necessary details about it. It wants that, “the summary of feedback/comments received from the public/other stakeholders should be placed on the website of the Department/Ministry concerned”.
Calling this a necessary “pre-legislative process”, Nayak wonders, “What can citizens do to demand formal public consultation on the land bill?” He adds, “While there are many critics of the proposed changes to the land acquisition law, there are several others who support it. Parliament must have the benefit of all views and opinions on the subject before it makes an informed decision on the amendment proposals - whether to approve, further amend or reject.”

Comments

TRENDING

Girl child education: 20 major states 'score' better than Gujarat, says GoI report

By Rajiv Shah
A Government of India report, released last month, has suggested that “model” Gujarat has failed to make any progress vis-à-vis other states in ensuring that girls continue to remain enrolled after they leave primary schools. The report finds that, in the age group 14-17, Gujarat’s 71% girls are enrolled at the secondary and higher secondary level, which is worse than 20 out of 22 major states for which data have been made available.

Congress 'promises' cancellation of Adani power project: Jharkhand elections

Counterview Desk
Pointing out that people's issues take a backseat in Jharkhand's 2019 assembly elections, the state's civil rights organization, the Jharkhand Janadhikar Mahasabha, a coalition of activists and people’s organisations, has said that political parties have largely ignored in their electoral manifestos the need to implement the fifth schedule of the Constitution in a predominantly tribal district.

Gujarat refusal to observe Maulana Azad's birthday as Education Day 'discriminatory'

By Our Representative
The Gujarat government decision not to celebrate the National Education Day on !monday has gone controversial. Civil society organizations have particularly wondered whether the state government is shying away from the occasion, especially against the backdrop of "deteriorating" level of education in Gujarat.

Hindutva founders 'borrowed' Nazi, fascist idea of one flag, one leader, one ideology

By Shamsul Islam*
With the unleashing of the reign of terror by the RSS/BJP rulers against working-class, peasant organizations, women organizations, student movements, intellectuals, writers, poets and progressive social/political activists, India also witnessed a series of resistance programmes organized by the pro-people cultural organizations in different parts of the country. My address in some of these programmes is reproduced here... 
***  Before sharing my views on the tasks of artists-writers-intellectuals in the times of fascism, let me briefly define fascism and how it is different from totalitarianism. Totalitarianism is political concept, a dictatorship of an individual, family or group which prohibits opposition in any form, and exercises an extremely high degree of control over public and private life. It is also described as authoritarianism.
Whereas fascism, while retaining all these repressive characteristics, also believes in god-ordained superiority of race, cultur…

Ex-World Bank chief economist doubts spurt in India's ease of doing business rank

By Rajiv Shah
This is in continuation of my previous blog where I had quoted from a commentary which top economist Prof Kaushik Basu had written in the New York Times (NYT) a little less than a month ago, on November 6, to be exact. He recalled this article through a tweet on November 29, soon after it was made known that India's growth rate had slumped (officially!) to 4.5%.

With RSS around, does India need foreign enemy to undo its democratic-secular fabric?

By Shamsul Islam*
Many well-meaning liberal and secular political analysts are highly perturbed by sectarian policy decisions of RSS/BJP rulers led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, especially after starting his second inning. They are vocal in red-flagging lynching incidents, policies of the Modi government on Kashmir, the National Register of Citizens (NRC), the demand for 'Bharat Ratna' to Savarkar who submitted 6-7 mercy petitions to the British masters (getting remission of 40 years out of 50 years' sentence), and the murder of constitutional norms in Goa, Karnataka and now in Maharashtra.

Rushdie, Pamuk, 260 writers tell Modi: Aatish episode casts chill on public discourse

Counterview Desk
As many as 260 writers, journalists, artists, academics and activists across the world, including Salman Rushdie, British Indian novelist, Orhan Pamuk, Turkish novelist and recipient of the 2006 Nobel Prize in literature, and Margaret Atwood, Canadian poet and novelist, have called upon Prime Minister Narendra Modi to review the decision to strip British Indian writer Aatish Taseer of his overseas Indian citizenship.

Post-Balakot, danger that events might spiral out of control is 'greater, not less'

By Tapan Bose*
The fear of war in South Asia is increasing. Tensions are escalating between India and Pakistan after the Indian defence minister's announcement in August this year that India may revoke its current commitment to only use nuclear weapons in retaliation for a nuclear attack, known as ‘no first use’. According to some experts who are watching the situation the risk of a conflict between the two countries has never been greater since they both tested nuclear weapons in 1998.

Worrying signs in BJP: Modi, Shah begin 'cold-shouldering' Gujarat CM, party chief

By RK Misra*
The political developments in neighbouring Maharashtra where a Shiv Sena-NCP-Congress government assumed office has had a trickle down effect in Gujarat with both the ruling BJP and the Congress opposition going into revamp mode.

'Favouring' tribals and ignoring Adivasis? Behind coercion of India's aborigines

By Mohan Guruswamy*
Tribal people account for 8.2% of India’s population. They are spread over all of India’s States and Union Territories. Even so they can be broadly classified into three groupings. The first grouping consists of populations who predate the Indo-Aryan migrations. These are termed by many anthropologists as the Austro-Asiatic-speaking Australoid people.