Skip to main content

Gujarat bureaucrat Aloria, "instrumental" in seeking inquiry against Ford Foundation, made state chief secretary

Pandian with Aloria
By A Representative
The Gujarat government on Saturday appointed GR Aloria, a 1981 batch IAS bureaucrat, as new state secretary. The posting comes weeks after Gujarat home department under him wrote to the Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, seeking inquiry into the American philanthropic organization Ford Foundation’s grants to NGOs run by human rights activist Teesta Setalvad, fighting tens of 2002 communal riots cases, even as highlighting Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s complicity.
Aloria has been holding charge of the state home department along with urban development department. Previously, he was with the Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Ltd, the state agency implementing the Narmada project. He has worked as municipal commissioner in several Gujarat cities.
Close to Gujarat chief minister Anandiben Patel, a known Modi protégé, Aloria as head of the state home department, his colleagues recall, was also “instrumental” helping draft the controversial Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organized Crime (GCTOC) Bill, currently pending Presidential accent.
A stricter avatar a similar Bill, rejected by the previous Gujarat governor thrice, GCTOC’s contentious provisions are admissibility of evidence collected through telephonic interception and confession before police officer as evidence in court, and time limit of six months to file charge sheet. Already, GCTOC has under sharp criticism from several top civil rights organizations, including Amnesty International (click HERE to read), apart from the Opposition Congress.
Other recent “contributions” of Aloria’s tenure in home department, say bureaucrats, include triggering reinstatement of some of the key Gujarat cops, whose name appeared in Gujarat’s highly debated fake encounter cases. These include PP Pandey, posted as additional director-general, law and order; Geetha Johri, who was ranked director general of police; and Vipul Agrawal, posted as managing director, Gujarat Medical Services Corporation Limited, a state government undertaking.
As predicted by Counterview in January 2015 (click HERE to read), D Jagatheesa Pandian, who is senior batchmate of Aloria, failed to get the much-expected extension. The reasons include, say bureaucrats, his alleged failure to keep political masters, particularly state energy minister Saurabh Patel, de facto No 2 in Gujarat Cabinet, happy. Criticisms kept piling up against him for “misguiding” the political bosses about premier state sector undertaking Gujarat State Petroleum Corporation’s (GSPC’s), ability to continue with oil-and-gas explorations.
Pandian served as head of the GSPC for a decade before he was posted as state energy secretary in Sachivalaya in 2009, and later as state industries secretary. Made Gujarat chief secretary on November 1, 2014, he came under heavy internal criticism for creating “hype” around a huge 20 trillion cubic feet (tcf) of gas in explorations by GSPC in the Krishna Godavari (KG) Basin, off Andhra Pradesh coast.
While Modi, as Gujarat chief minister, made a big show of 20 tcf gas in 2005 declaring how GSPC had turned into the biggest oil-and-gas-exploration company of India under him, bureaucrats say, the fault wasn’t entirely Pandian’s. Modi himself “decided” on the 20 tcf figure in an internal meeting, even as then state energy secretary Balwant Singh, backed by Pandian, kept saying this wasn’t so.
The actual gas found in KG Basin, it was revealed, was just about 2 tcf, of which just one-third was recoverable. Worse, under Pandian’s stewardship, and on Modi’s insistence, GSPC went “multinational”, kickstarting oil-and-gas exploration in Australia, Egypt, Yemen and Indonesia.
If foreign fields were dropped a couple of years ago because they were causing a huge drain on the state coffers, Gujarat government decided to “systematically withdraw” from the KG Basin, which cost the exchequer a whopping Rs 13,000 crore, in April this year.
Meanwhile, Gujarat officials said, Aloria left “no stone unturned in pleasing the powers that be”, including Modi, when he was chief minister till May 2014, and later his successor Anandiben Patel. While he was already heading urban development, he was simultaneously made in charge of the crucial home department in November 2014. Both urban development and home are directly handled by the Gujarat chief minister.
Aloria, it is said, was one of the most active backstage organizers of the two high-profile events which took place in Gandhinagar with the direct participation of Modi – the Pravasi Bharatiya Diwas, on January 7, followed by the Vibrant Gujarat business meet of January 11.
Unlike many other colleagues, Aloria meticulously kept his political bosses informed about every detail what all was happening in the babudom, and which babu thinks what. “He did this under Modi and continued it later. In doing so, he was performing his normal duty”, a senior official, who is known to be close to Aloria, said.

Comments

TRENDING

From Kerala to Bangladesh: Lynching highlights deep social faultlines

By A Representative   The recent incidents of mob lynching—one in Bangladesh involving a Hindu citizen and another in Kerala where a man was killed after being mistaken for a “Bangladeshi”—have sparked outrage and calls for accountability.  

Gram sabha as reformer: Mandla’s quiet challenge to the liquor economy

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  This year, the Union Ministry of Panchayati Raj is organising a two-day PESA Mahotsav in Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, on 23–24 December 2025. The event marks the passage of the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA), enacted by Parliament on 24 December 1996 to establish self-governance in Fifth Schedule areas. Scheduled Areas are those notified by the President of India under Article 244(1) read with the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution, which provides for a distinct framework of governance recognising the autonomy of tribal regions. At present, Fifth Schedule areas exist in ten states: Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan and Telangana. The PESA Act, 1996 empowers Gram Sabhas—the village assemblies—as the foundation of self-rule in these areas. Among the many powers devolved to them is the authority to take decisions on local matters, including the regulation...

When a city rebuilt forgets its builders: Migrant workers’ struggle for sanitation in Bhuj

Khasra Ground site By Aseem Mishra*  Access to safe drinking water and sanitation is not a privilege—it is a fundamental human right. This principle has been unequivocally recognised by the United Nations and repeatedly affirmed by the Supreme Court of India as intrinsic to the right to life and dignity under Article 21 of the Constitution. Yet, for thousands of migrant workers living in Bhuj, this right remains elusive, exposing a troubling disconnect between constitutional guarantees, policy declarations, and lived reality.

Policy changes in rural employment scheme and the politics of nomenclature

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The Government of India has introduced a revised rural employment programme by fine-tuning the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), which has been in operation for nearly two decades. The MGNREGA scheme guarantees 100 days of employment annually to rural households and has primarily benefited populations in rural areas. The revised programme has been named VB-G RAM–G (Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission – Gramin). The government has stated that the revised scheme incorporates several structural changes, including an increase in guaranteed employment from 100 to 125 days, modifications in the financing pattern, provisions to strengthen unemployment allowances, and penalties for delays in wage payments. Given the extent of these changes, the government has argued that a new name is required to distinguish the revised programme from the existing MGNREGA framework. As has been witnessed in recent years, the introdu...

Aravalli at the crossroads: Environment, democracy, and the crisis of justice

By  Rajendra Singh*  The functioning of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change has undergone a troubling shift. Once mandated to safeguard forests and ecosystems, the Ministry now appears increasingly aligned with industrial interests. Its recent affidavit before the Supreme Court makes this drift unmistakably clear. An institution ostensibly created to protect the environment now seems to have strayed from that very purpose.

'Structural sabotage': Concern over sector-limited job guarantee in new employment law

By A Representative   The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has raised concerns over the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (VB–G RAM G), which was approved during the recently concluded session of Parliament amid protests by opposition members. The legislation is intended to replace the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).

'Festive cheer fades': India’s housing market hits 17‑quarter slump, sales drop 16% in Q4 2025

By A Representative   Housing sales across India’s nine major real estate markets fell to a 17‑quarter low in the October–December period of 2025, with overall absorption dropping 16% year‑on‑year to 98,019 units, according to NSE‑listed analytics firm PropEquity. This marks the weakest quarter since Q3 2021, despite the festive season that usually drives demand. On a sequential basis, sales slipped 2%, while new launches contracted by 4%.  

Safety, pay and job security drive Urban Company gig workers’ protest in Gurugram

By A Representative   Gig and platform service workers associated with Urban Company have stepped up their protest against what they describe as exploitative and unsafe working conditions, submitting a detailed Memorandum of Demands at the company’s Udyog Vihar office in Gurugram. The action is being seen as part of a wider and growing wave of dissatisfaction among gig workers across India, many of whom have resorted to demonstrations, app log-outs and strikes in recent months to press for fair pay, job security and basic labour protections.

Public responses to the niqab incident and Iltija Mufti’s legal complaint

By Raqif Makhdoomi*  Following an incident in which the Chief Minister of Bihar was seen pulling aside the niqab of a Muslim woman doctor during a public interaction, the episode drew widespread attention and debate across India. Public reactions were divided, with some defending the action and others criticising it as an infringement on personal autonomy and dignity. The incident was widely circulated on social media and reported by national and international media outlets.