Coalition for a GM-Free India demands halt to gene-edited rice and sheep releases, calls for robust regulation

By A Representative

The Coalition for a GM-Free India, a national platform advocating for safe and sustainable agriculture, has called for the immediate withdrawal of two gene-edited rice varieties, Kamala (DRR Dhan 100) and Pusa DST Rice 1, along with gene-edited sheep, in a letter addressed to Union Agriculture Minister Shivraj Singh Chauhan. The coalition argues that these varieties, developed by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), lack adequate safety testing and pose significant risks to human health, the environment, and India’s agricultural sovereignty.

In the letter, signed by co-convenors Kavitha Kuruganti and Rajesh Krishnan and endorsed by over 80 scientists, doctors, and researchers, the coalition criticizes the government’s decision to release the rice varieties without rigorous regulatory oversight. The varieties, developed using CRISPR-Cas9 technology, were announced on May 4, 2025, as India’s first genome-edited crops, aimed at improving yield, drought tolerance, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. However, the coalition contends that the technology is imprecise and could lead to unintended genetic mutations, potentially producing toxic or allergenic proteins.

The coalition highlights scientific evidence showing that gene-editing tools, including SDN-1 and SDN-2 techniques used in the rice varieties, can cause off-target mutations and unintentional insertion of foreign genetic material, such as plasmids and antibiotic-resistant marker genes. These concerns are compounded by the 2022 deregulation of SDN-1 and SDN-2 under India’s biosafety regulations, which exempts them from the stringent oversight applied to genetically modified (GM) crops. The coalition argues that the Institutional Biosafety Committees (IBSCs) tasked with self-regulation face conflicts of interest, effectively rendering the process equivalent to deregulation.

The letter also raises alarms about the threat to India’s rice export markets, particularly in the Middle East, where consumer sentiment favors non-GM and organic rice. With India being the world’s largest rice producer, the coalition warns that introducing gene-edited varieties could jeopardize the $1.2 billion organic rice export market and contaminate the country’s diverse rice germplasm, a critical asset for climate resilience.

Additionally, the coalition questions the intellectual property rights (IPR) surrounding the gene-editing tools used, noting a lack of transparency about their origins and potential proprietary constraints. This could undermine farmers’ seed sovereignty and lead to economic losses, as seen in past cases like Bt cotton. The coalition also dismisses claims that these varieties will reduce rice cultivation area, arguing that higher-yielding traditional and conventionally bred varieties already exist and that policy incentives, not productivity, drive paddy expansion.

The letter further emphasizes cultural concerns, noting that rice holds spiritual significance in India as “akshat” (unbroken and whole) in rituals. The deletion of 366 base pairs in Pusa DST Rice 1 and 33 base pairs in Kamala through gene editing is seen as compromising this sanctity.

The coalition urges the government to:

1. Immediately withdraw the planned release of Kamala, Pusa DST Rice 1, and gene-edited sheep, and publicly share all related data for scientific scrutiny.

2. Reinstate full regulation of all gene-editing techniques under GMO frameworks, reversing the exemption of SDN-1 and SDN-2 categories.

The letter, copied to Union Ministers Bhupender Yadav, Jitendra Singh, and Rajiv Ranjan Singh, reflects growing concerns among scientists and activists about the risks of gene-edited crops.

Comments

How natural and organic farming can be a key to combating the climate crisis

By Raj Kumar Sinha* On July 9, while addressing the “Sahkar Samvad” in Ahmedabad with women and workers associated with cooperatives from Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, and Rajasthan, Union Home Minister Amit Shah emphasized that natural farming is essential for both our health and the health of the soil. This is a significant statement in the context of addressing the climate change crisis. Natural farming can play a crucial role in combating climate change. Also known as organic farming, it is a system of agriculture that can increase food production without harming the environment. Natural farming has the potential to reduce carbon emissions by 35% to 50%.

100 yrs of RSS as seen by global media house: Power, controversy, push for Hindu-first India

By Rajiv Shah On a blistering summer evening in Nagpur, nearly a thousand men in brown trousers, white shirts, and black caps stood in formation as a saffron flag was raised, marking a graduation ceremony for Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) workers. This vivid scene, described in a recent FT Weekend Magazine article, “A hundred years after it was founded, India's Hindu-nationalist movement is getting closer to its goal of a Hindu-first state,” captures the enduring presence of the RSS, a century-old Hindu-nationalist organization.

Another 'honor' killing in Tamil Nadu: Caste pride has murdered love, again

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* Once again, Tamil Nadu has witnessed a brutal so-called 'honor' killing. This time, it is Kevin Selvaganesh, a 27-year-old software engineer from the Scheduled Caste community, who has been hacked to death by the family of the girl he loved since childhood. Kevin, a brilliant student employed at Tata Consultancy Services, was in a relationship with Subashini, his schoolmate and girlfriend. The couple, both well-educated and professionally qualified, had plans to marry. Yet, that love story ended in bloodshed — sacrificed at the altar of caste pride.

Why is India’s cheetah project under fire? Study flags ecological, social, species injustices

By Rajiv Shah A recent peer-reviewed study has sharply criticized Project Cheetah—India’s high-profile initiative to reintroduce African cheetahs into the wild—as ethically compromised, scientifically flawed, and socially unjust. Titled “Delineating the Environmental Justice Implications of an Experimental Cheetah Introduction Project in India”, the paper is authored by Yashendu C. Joshi, Stephanie E. Klarmann, and Louise C. de Waal, and was published in Frontiers in Conservation Science.

The myth of population decline: India’s real challenge is density, not fertility

By N.S. Venkataraman* India’s population in 2025 stands at approximately 1.4 billion. In 1950, it was 359 million, rising sharply to 1.05 billion by 2000. The population continues to grow and is projected to reach around 1.7 billion by 2050.

Siang dam project sparks debate over security, development, and displacement in Arunachal

By Aarna Gupta* The proposed Siang Upper Multipurpose Project (SUMP) in Arunachal Pradesh, India, has emerged as a contentious initiative shaped by strategic, environmental, and social concerns. Indian officials, including Union Minister Kiren Rijiju and Arunachal Pradesh Chief Minister Pema Khandu, have voiced strong support for the project. One of the primary motivations is China’s plan to build a 60,000 MW hydropower dam on the Yarlung Tsangpo River (the upper stretch of the Brahmaputra) in Tibet, which Indian authorities see as a threat to water and national security. In response, the 11,000 MW Siang Dam, with its 9 billion cubic meter reservoir, is viewed as a necessary countermeasure to manage water flow and reduce vulnerability.

Shanghai Textbook reassessed: Between revolutionary rhetoric and economic reality

By Harsh Thakor "Maoist Economics and the Revolutionary Road to Communism: The Shanghai Textbook on Socialist Political Economy" (1975) presents a detailed exposition of the Chinese perspective on socialist political economy under Mao . Developed during the Cultural Revolution, it outlines a theoretical framework for the functioning of a socialist alternative to capitalism. The book was formulated under the direction of Zhang Chunqiao, who played a central role in discussions, content planning, and final reviews of the draft.

Trump’s tariff tactics are a geopolitical bully move that may backfire

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* U.S. President Donald Trump’s recent move to impose high tariffs on Indian goods is yet another example of his aggressive, unilateralist economic policy—an attempt to pressure and punish rather than to negotiate. This is not an isolated action. Trump has shown similar hostility toward other countries aligned with the BRICS bloc—Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—reflecting his disdain for multipolar global cooperation and his desire to maintain American economic supremacy at all costs.

Search This Blog